Increasing global supply chains’ resilience after the COVID-19 pandemic: Empirical results from a Delphi study

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Maximilian Gebhardt, Alexander Spieske, Matthias Kopyto, Hendrik Birkel
{"title":"Increasing global supply chains’ resilience after the COVID-19 pandemic: Empirical results from a Delphi study","authors":"Maximilian Gebhardt,&nbsp;Alexander Spieske,&nbsp;Matthias Kopyto,&nbsp;Hendrik Birkel","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>COVID-19 has revealed global supply chains’ vulnerability and sparked debate about increasing supply chain resilience (SCRES). Previous SCRES research has primarily focused on near-term responses to large-scale disruptions, neglecting long-term resilience approaches. We address this research gap by presenting empirical evidence from a Delphi study. Based on the resource dependence theory, we developed 10 projections for 2025 on promising supply chain adaptations, which were assessed by 94 international supply chain experts from academia and industry. The results reveal that companies prioritize bridging over buffering approaches as long-term responses for increasing SCRES. Promising measures include increasing risk criteria importance in supplier selection, supply chain collaboration, and supply chain mapping. In contrast, experts ascribe less priority to safety stocks and coopetition. Moreover, we present a stakeholder analysis confirming one of the resource dependence theory’s central propositions for the future of global supply chains: companies differently affected by externalities will choose different countermeasures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"150 ","pages":"Pages 59-72"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9186425/pdf/","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322005409","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

COVID-19 has revealed global supply chains’ vulnerability and sparked debate about increasing supply chain resilience (SCRES). Previous SCRES research has primarily focused on near-term responses to large-scale disruptions, neglecting long-term resilience approaches. We address this research gap by presenting empirical evidence from a Delphi study. Based on the resource dependence theory, we developed 10 projections for 2025 on promising supply chain adaptations, which were assessed by 94 international supply chain experts from academia and industry. The results reveal that companies prioritize bridging over buffering approaches as long-term responses for increasing SCRES. Promising measures include increasing risk criteria importance in supplier selection, supply chain collaboration, and supply chain mapping. In contrast, experts ascribe less priority to safety stocks and coopetition. Moreover, we present a stakeholder analysis confirming one of the resource dependence theory’s central propositions for the future of global supply chains: companies differently affected by externalities will choose different countermeasures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

COVID-19大流行后提高全球供应链的弹性:德尔菲研究的实证结果
COVID-19暴露了全球供应链的脆弱性,引发了关于提高供应链弹性(SCRES)的辩论。之前的SCRES研究主要集中在大规模中断的短期反应上,而忽视了长期恢复能力的方法。我们通过提出来自德尔菲研究的经验证据来解决这一研究差距。基于资源依赖理论,我们对2025年有前景的供应链适应性提出了10个预测,并由94位来自学术界和产业界的国际供应链专家进行了评估。结果表明,公司优先考虑桥接而不是缓冲方法作为提高SCRES的长期对策。有希望的措施包括增加风险标准在供应商选择、供应链协作和供应链映射中的重要性。相比之下,专家们认为安全库存和合作不那么重要。此外,我们提出了一个利益相关者分析,证实了资源依赖理论对未来全球供应链的核心命题之一:受外部性影响不同的公司会选择不同的对策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信