IgA quantification as a good predictor of the neutralizing antibodies levels after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2

IF 1.6 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Lorena O. Fernandes-Siqueira , Bruna G. Sousa , Carlos E. Cleto , Luciana S. Wermelinger , Beatriz L.L. Caetano , Agatha R. Pacheco , Simone M. Costa , Fabio C.L. Almeida , Gustavo C. Ferreira , Didier Salmon , Ada M.B. Alves , Andrea T. Da Poian
{"title":"IgA quantification as a good predictor of the neutralizing antibodies levels after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2","authors":"Lorena O. Fernandes-Siqueira ,&nbsp;Bruna G. Sousa ,&nbsp;Carlos E. Cleto ,&nbsp;Luciana S. Wermelinger ,&nbsp;Beatriz L.L. Caetano ,&nbsp;Agatha R. Pacheco ,&nbsp;Simone M. Costa ,&nbsp;Fabio C.L. Almeida ,&nbsp;Gustavo C. Ferreira ,&nbsp;Didier Salmon ,&nbsp;Ada M.B. Alves ,&nbsp;Andrea T. Da Poian","doi":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Vaccination against COVID-19 was implemented very quickly, but the emergence of new variants that can evade the previous acquired immunological protection highlights the importance of understanding the mechanisms involved in the immune response generated after SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Since most of our knowledge on the humoral immunity generated against SARS-CoV-2 has been obtained from studies with infected patients before vaccination, our goal here was to evaluate seroconversion and its correlation with the titers of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) in individuals who received the complete initial recommended vaccination schedule with three different vaccines.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We analyzed serum IgG, IgA and total NAbs against the trimeric SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) protein or its receptor binding domain (RBD) in blood samples collected from 118 healthy individuals without known previous infection, before and after receiving the first and the second dose of CoronaVac (<em>n</em> = 18), ChAdOx-1 (<em>n</em> = 68) or BNT162b2 (<em>n</em> = 32) vaccines.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found that although IgG titers were high in all sera collected after the two doses of these vaccines, NAbs amounts varies among the groups. In contrast, serum NAbs concentrations were much more comparable to the IgA levels, indicating that these antibodies would have a major neutralizing capacity against SARS-CoV-2.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Altogether our data suggest that quantification of serum anti-S or anti-RBD IgA, rather than IgG, may be a valuable tool to screen NAbs and may be considered for surveillance of vaccine coverage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical virology plus","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635250/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical virology plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038022000606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

Vaccination against COVID-19 was implemented very quickly, but the emergence of new variants that can evade the previous acquired immunological protection highlights the importance of understanding the mechanisms involved in the immune response generated after SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination.

Objectives

Since most of our knowledge on the humoral immunity generated against SARS-CoV-2 has been obtained from studies with infected patients before vaccination, our goal here was to evaluate seroconversion and its correlation with the titers of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) in individuals who received the complete initial recommended vaccination schedule with three different vaccines.

Study design

We analyzed serum IgG, IgA and total NAbs against the trimeric SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) protein or its receptor binding domain (RBD) in blood samples collected from 118 healthy individuals without known previous infection, before and after receiving the first and the second dose of CoronaVac (n = 18), ChAdOx-1 (n = 68) or BNT162b2 (n = 32) vaccines.

Results

We found that although IgG titers were high in all sera collected after the two doses of these vaccines, NAbs amounts varies among the groups. In contrast, serum NAbs concentrations were much more comparable to the IgA levels, indicating that these antibodies would have a major neutralizing capacity against SARS-CoV-2.

Conclusions

Altogether our data suggest that quantification of serum anti-S or anti-RBD IgA, rather than IgG, may be a valuable tool to screen NAbs and may be considered for surveillance of vaccine coverage.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

免疫球蛋白a定量作为接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗后中和抗体水平的良好预测因子
针对COVID-19的疫苗接种实施得非常快,但新变体的出现可以逃避先前获得的免疫保护,这凸显了了解SARS-CoV-2感染或疫苗接种后产生的免疫反应机制的重要性。由于我们对SARS-CoV-2产生的体液免疫的大部分知识都是在接种疫苗前对感染患者进行的研究中获得的,因此我们在这里的目标是评估接种了三种不同疫苗的完整初始推荐接种计划的个体的血清转化及其与中和抗体(nab)滴度的相关性。研究设计我们分析了118名健康个体在接种第一剂和第二剂CoronaVac (n = 18)、ChAdOx-1 (n = 68)或BNT162b2 (n = 32)疫苗前后血清中针对三聚体SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S)蛋白或其受体结合域(RBD)的IgG、IgA和总抗体。结果两剂疫苗接种后血清中IgG滴度均较高,但nab含量在各组间存在差异。相比之下,血清nab浓度与IgA水平更具可比性,表明这些抗体对SARS-CoV-2具有主要的中和能力。综上所述,我们的数据表明,血清抗s或抗rbd IgA(而非IgG)的定量可能是筛选抗体的一种有价值的工具,并可能被考虑用于疫苗覆盖率的监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of clinical virology plus
Journal of clinical virology plus Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信