Optimising trajectory planning for stereotactic brain tumour biopsy using artificial intelligence: a systematic review of the literature.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
British Journal of Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-13 DOI:10.1080/02688697.2023.2210225
Joachim Starup-Hansen, Simon C Williams, Jonathan P Funnell, John G Hanrahan, Shah Islam, Alaa Al-Mohammad, Ciaran S Hill
{"title":"Optimising trajectory planning for stereotactic brain tumour biopsy using artificial intelligence: a systematic review of the literature.","authors":"Joachim Starup-Hansen, Simon C Williams, Jonathan P Funnell, John G Hanrahan, Shah Islam, Alaa Al-Mohammad, Ciaran S Hill","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2023.2210225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite advances in technology, stereotactic brain tumour biopsy remains challenging due to the risk of injury to critical structures. Indeed, choosing the correct trajectory remains essential to patient safety. Artificial intelligence can be used to perform automated trajectory planning. We present a systematic review of automated trajectory planning algorithms for stereotactic brain tumour biopsies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA adherent systematic review was conducted. Databases were searched using keyword combinations of 'artificial intelligence', 'trajectory planning' and 'brain tumours'. Studies reporting applications of artificial intelligence (AI) to trajectory planning for brain tumour biopsy were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All eight studies were in the earliest stage of the IDEAL-D development framework. Trajectory plans were compared through a variety of surrogate markers of safety, of which the minimum distance to blood vessels was the most common. Five studies compared manual to automated planning strategies and favoured automation in all cases. However, this comes with a significant risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review reveals the need for IDEAL-D Stage 1 research into automated trajectory planning for brain tumour biopsy. Future studies should establish the congruence between expected risk of algorithms and the ground truth through comparisons to real world outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"163-172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2023.2210225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Despite advances in technology, stereotactic brain tumour biopsy remains challenging due to the risk of injury to critical structures. Indeed, choosing the correct trajectory remains essential to patient safety. Artificial intelligence can be used to perform automated trajectory planning. We present a systematic review of automated trajectory planning algorithms for stereotactic brain tumour biopsies.

Methods: A PRISMA adherent systematic review was conducted. Databases were searched using keyword combinations of 'artificial intelligence', 'trajectory planning' and 'brain tumours'. Studies reporting applications of artificial intelligence (AI) to trajectory planning for brain tumour biopsy were included.

Results: All eight studies were in the earliest stage of the IDEAL-D development framework. Trajectory plans were compared through a variety of surrogate markers of safety, of which the minimum distance to blood vessels was the most common. Five studies compared manual to automated planning strategies and favoured automation in all cases. However, this comes with a significant risk of bias.

Conclusions: This systematic review reveals the need for IDEAL-D Stage 1 research into automated trajectory planning for brain tumour biopsy. Future studies should establish the congruence between expected risk of algorithms and the ground truth through comparisons to real world outcomes.

利用人工智能优化立体定向脑肿瘤活检的轨迹规划:对文献的系统回顾。
目的:尽管技术进步,但由于存在损伤关键结构的风险,立体定向脑肿瘤活检仍然具有挑战性。事实上,选择正确的轨迹对患者安全仍然至关重要。人工智能可以用于执行自动轨迹规划。我们提出了立体定向脑肿瘤活检的自动轨迹规划算法的系统回顾。方法:采用PRISMA贴壁系统评价。数据库使用“人工智能”、“轨迹规划”和“脑肿瘤”的关键词组合进行搜索。研究报告了人工智能(AI)在脑肿瘤活检的轨迹规划中的应用。结果:所有8项研究均处于IDEAL-D开发框架的早期阶段。通过各种替代安全标记比较轨迹方案,其中与血管的最小距离是最常见的。五项研究比较了手动和自动化规划策略,在所有情况下都倾向于自动化。然而,这带来了很大的偏倚风险。结论:本系统综述揭示了对脑肿瘤活检自动轨迹规划进行IDEAL-D一期研究的必要性。未来的研究应该通过与现实世界结果的比较,建立算法的预期风险与基本事实之间的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Neurosurgery
British Journal of Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide. Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信