Impact of body weight-based dosing of palonosetron and ondansetron on postoperative nausea and vomiting following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a randomized, double-blind study.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Acta Chirurgica Belgica Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-13 DOI:10.1080/00015458.2023.2184939
Büşra Burcu, Nadir Adnan Hacım, Ozan Caliskan, Serdar Demirgan, Talar Vartanoglu Aktokmakyan, Serhat Meric, Tomris Duymaz, Onder Karabay, Ali Solmaz
{"title":"Impact of body weight-based dosing of palonosetron and ondansetron on postoperative nausea and vomiting following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a randomized, double-blind study.","authors":"Büşra Burcu, Nadir Adnan Hacım, Ozan Caliskan, Serdar Demirgan, Talar Vartanoglu Aktokmakyan, Serhat Meric, Tomris Duymaz, Onder Karabay, Ali Solmaz","doi":"10.1080/00015458.2023.2184939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent adverse effect following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Palonosetron with a standard dosing (75 μg) schedule has been questioned due to its low efficiency in obese patients. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of the body weight-based dosing of palonosetron in managing PONV following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, prospective, double-blinded randomized study was conducted between August 2021 and December 2021. Patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were prospectively recruited in the study. One hundred patients were randomly divided into palonosetron (Group P) and ondansetron (Group O). The demographic and clinical variables were recorded. The primary outcome of the study was the incidence of PONV between the two groups during the hospitalization. The secondary outcomes were the number of rescue anti-emetic and analgesic medications and the Functional Living Index-Emesis scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 50 patients in each group (Group P and Group O). There were significant differences in the scores of POVN, nausea, and vomiting favoring Group P. In Group P, the rate of patients using rescue anti-emetics was significantly lower. The incidence of complete response and proportion of patients with higher Functional Living Index-Emesis scores were significantly higher in patients using palonosetron.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of palonosetron significantly reduced the incidence of PONV following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. There was a significant improvement in the scores of Functional Living Index-Emesis in patients using palonosetron.</p>","PeriodicalId":6935,"journal":{"name":"Acta Chirurgica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":"41-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Chirurgica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2023.2184939","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent adverse effect following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Palonosetron with a standard dosing (75 μg) schedule has been questioned due to its low efficiency in obese patients. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of the body weight-based dosing of palonosetron in managing PONV following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Methods: A single-center, prospective, double-blinded randomized study was conducted between August 2021 and December 2021. Patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were prospectively recruited in the study. One hundred patients were randomly divided into palonosetron (Group P) and ondansetron (Group O). The demographic and clinical variables were recorded. The primary outcome of the study was the incidence of PONV between the two groups during the hospitalization. The secondary outcomes were the number of rescue anti-emetic and analgesic medications and the Functional Living Index-Emesis scores.

Results: There were 50 patients in each group (Group P and Group O). There were significant differences in the scores of POVN, nausea, and vomiting favoring Group P. In Group P, the rate of patients using rescue anti-emetics was significantly lower. The incidence of complete response and proportion of patients with higher Functional Living Index-Emesis scores were significantly higher in patients using palonosetron.

Conclusions: The use of palonosetron significantly reduced the incidence of PONV following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. There was a significant improvement in the scores of Functional Living Index-Emesis in patients using palonosetron.

基于体重的帕洛诺司琼和昂丹司琼剂量对腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后恶心和呕吐的影响:一项随机双盲研究。
背景:术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)是腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后经常出现的不良反应。帕洛诺司琼的标准剂量(75 μg)在肥胖患者中效率较低,因此受到质疑。本研究旨在探讨基于体重的帕洛诺司琼剂量在治疗腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后 PONV 的有效性和安全性:方法:2021 年 8 月至 2021 年 12 月期间进行了一项单中心、前瞻性、双盲随机研究。研究前瞻性地招募了接受腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的患者。100 名患者被随机分为帕洛诺司琼(P 组)和昂丹司琼(O 组)。研究人员记录了人口统计学和临床变量。研究的主要结果是两组患者在住院期间的 PONV 发生率。次要结果是止吐和镇痛药物的抢救次数以及功能性生活指数-Emesis评分:结果:两组(P 组和 O 组)各有 50 名患者。P 组患者使用抢救性止吐药的比例明显较低。使用帕洛诺司琼的患者完全应答率和功能生活指数-Emesis评分较高的患者比例明显较高:结论:使用帕洛诺司琼可明显降低腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后PONV的发生率。结论:使用帕洛诺司琼可明显降低腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后 PONV 的发生率,使用帕洛诺司琼的患者的功能生活指数(Functional Living Index-Emesis)评分也有明显改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Chirurgica Belgica
Acta Chirurgica Belgica 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Chirurgica Belgica (ACB) is the official journal of the Royal Belgian Society for Surgery (RBSS) and its affiliated societies. It publishes Editorials, Review papers, Original Research, and Technique related manuscripts in the broad field of Clinical Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信