Treatment with biologic DMARDs may not adversely affect lung nodules in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

IF 1.3 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Hazan Karadeniz, Emetullah Cindil, Hakan Babaoğlu, Aslıhan Avanoğlu Güler, Reyhan Bilici Salman, Hasan Satış, Nuh Ataş, Berna Göker, Şeminur Haznedaroğlu, Mehmet Akif Öztürk, Abdurrahman Tufan
{"title":"Treatment with biologic DMARDs may not adversely affect lung nodules in rheumatoid arthritis patients.","authors":"Hazan Karadeniz,&nbsp;Emetullah Cindil,&nbsp;Hakan Babaoğlu,&nbsp;Aslıhan Avanoğlu Güler,&nbsp;Reyhan Bilici Salman,&nbsp;Hasan Satış,&nbsp;Nuh Ataş,&nbsp;Berna Göker,&nbsp;Şeminur Haznedaroğlu,&nbsp;Mehmet Akif Öztürk,&nbsp;Abdurrahman Tufan","doi":"10.5152/eujrheum.2022.21067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lung nodules (LNs) impose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in patients with rheuma- toid arthritis (RA) due to unpredictable outcomes. Potential induction of nodulosis with the use of con- ventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARD) and lack of knowledge regarding the effect of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)/tofacitinib on the LN raise concerns and have an impact on treatment decisions. This study aims to evaluate the possible effects of the bDMARDs/tofa- citinib and csDMARDS on LNs observed in RA patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic health records of RA patients who had LNs detected on computed tomography (CT) between January 2015 and December 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with follow- up CT images were included in the study. Baseline and follow-up images were meticulously examined for the number, size, attenuation, and cavity formation. Clinical, histopathologic, and laboratory find- ings were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two RA patients with LNs were studied, 21 were on bDMARDs/tofacitinib (11 females, mean age: 59.7 6 8.4) and 21 were on csDMARDs (12 females, mean age: 71.4 6 8.3). The proportion of patients with progressed nodules during follow-up was comparable between groups (six patients in bDMARDs/tofacitinib vs seven patients in csDMARDs). Progression of LNs was observed in six patients in the bDMARDs/tofacitinib group: three in anti-TNFa, two in rituximab, and one in abatacept users and none in tofacitinib users.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that the risk of progression in LNs in RA patients with use of bDMARDs/tofacitinib might not impose a higher risk compared to csDMARDs. Moreover, bDMARDs/ tofacitinib might result in regression in LNs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12066,"journal":{"name":"European journal of rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/42/9a/ejr-9-2-75.PMC10176220.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/eujrheum.2022.21067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Lung nodules (LNs) impose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in patients with rheuma- toid arthritis (RA) due to unpredictable outcomes. Potential induction of nodulosis with the use of con- ventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARD) and lack of knowledge regarding the effect of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)/tofacitinib on the LN raise concerns and have an impact on treatment decisions. This study aims to evaluate the possible effects of the bDMARDs/tofa- citinib and csDMARDS on LNs observed in RA patients.

Methods: Electronic health records of RA patients who had LNs detected on computed tomography (CT) between January 2015 and December 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with follow- up CT images were included in the study. Baseline and follow-up images were meticulously examined for the number, size, attenuation, and cavity formation. Clinical, histopathologic, and laboratory find- ings were analyzed.

Results: Forty-two RA patients with LNs were studied, 21 were on bDMARDs/tofacitinib (11 females, mean age: 59.7 6 8.4) and 21 were on csDMARDs (12 females, mean age: 71.4 6 8.3). The proportion of patients with progressed nodules during follow-up was comparable between groups (six patients in bDMARDs/tofacitinib vs seven patients in csDMARDs). Progression of LNs was observed in six patients in the bDMARDs/tofacitinib group: three in anti-TNFa, two in rituximab, and one in abatacept users and none in tofacitinib users.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that the risk of progression in LNs in RA patients with use of bDMARDs/tofacitinib might not impose a higher risk compared to csDMARDs. Moreover, bDMARDs/ tofacitinib might result in regression in LNs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

生物dmard治疗可能不会对类风湿关节炎患者的肺结节产生不良影响。
目的:由于预后不可预测,肺结节(LNs)给类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的诊断和治疗带来了挑战。使用传统合成dmard (csDMARD)可能诱发结核,以及缺乏对生物疾病缓解抗风湿药物(bdmard)/托法替尼对LN的作用的了解,引起了人们的关注,并对治疗决策产生了影响。本研究旨在评估bDMARDs/tofa- citinib和csDMARDS对RA患者观察到的LNs的可能影响。方法:回顾性分析2015年1月至2020年12月期间在计算机断层扫描(CT)上检测到LNs的RA患者的电子健康记录。随访CT图像的患者也被纳入研究。仔细检查基线和随访图像的数量、大小、衰减和空腔形成。对临床、组织病理学和实验室结果进行分析。结果:研究了42例RA患者,其中21例使用bDMARDs/tofacitinib(11名女性,平均年龄:59.7 6 8.4),21例使用csDMARDs(12名女性,平均年龄:71.4 6 8.3)。随访期间进展性结节患者的比例在两组之间具有可比性(bdmard /tofacitinib组为6例,csdmard组为7例)。bDMARDs/tofacitinib组中有6例患者观察到LNs进展:抗tnfa组3例,利妥昔单抗组2例,阿巴接受组1例,托法替尼组无进展。结论:我们的研究结果表明,与csDMARDs相比,使用bDMARDs/tofacitinib的RA患者的LNs进展风险可能不会更高。此外,bDMARDs/ tofacitinib可能导致LNs的回归。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
7 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信