Social Class and Social Pain: Target SES Biases Judgments of Pain and Support for White Target Individuals.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Brielle N Johnson, Erin Freiburger, Jason C Deska, Jonathan W Kunstman
{"title":"Social Class and Social Pain: Target SES Biases Judgments of Pain and Support for White Target Individuals.","authors":"Brielle N Johnson, Erin Freiburger, Jason C Deska, Jonathan W Kunstman","doi":"10.1177/01461672231156025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social pain, defined as distress caused by negative interpersonal experiences (e.g., ostracism, mistreatment), is detrimental to health. Yet, it is unclear how social class might shape judgments of the social pains of low-socioeconomic status (SES) and high-SES individuals. Five studies tested competing toughness and empathy predictions for SES's effect on social pain judgments. Consistent with an empathy account, in all studies (<i>N</i><sub>cumulative</sub> = 1,046), low-SES White targets were judged more sensitive to social pain than high-SES White targets. Further, empathy mediated these effects, such that participants felt greater empathy and expected more social pain for low-SES targets relative to high-SES targets. Social pain judgments also informed judgments of social support needs, as low-SES targets were presumed to need more coping resources to manage hurtful events than high-SES targets. The current findings provide initial evidence that empathic concern for low-SES White individuals sensitizes social pain judgments and increases expected support needs for lower class White individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"957-970"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231156025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social pain, defined as distress caused by negative interpersonal experiences (e.g., ostracism, mistreatment), is detrimental to health. Yet, it is unclear how social class might shape judgments of the social pains of low-socioeconomic status (SES) and high-SES individuals. Five studies tested competing toughness and empathy predictions for SES's effect on social pain judgments. Consistent with an empathy account, in all studies (Ncumulative = 1,046), low-SES White targets were judged more sensitive to social pain than high-SES White targets. Further, empathy mediated these effects, such that participants felt greater empathy and expected more social pain for low-SES targets relative to high-SES targets. Social pain judgments also informed judgments of social support needs, as low-SES targets were presumed to need more coping resources to manage hurtful events than high-SES targets. The current findings provide initial evidence that empathic concern for low-SES White individuals sensitizes social pain judgments and increases expected support needs for lower class White individuals.

社会阶层和社会痛苦:目标SES对白人目标个体的痛苦和支持的判断存在偏见。
社会痛苦,定义为负面人际经历(如排斥、虐待)引起的痛苦,对健康有害。然而,尚不清楚社会阶层如何影响对低社会经济地位(SES)和高社会经济地位个体的社会痛苦的判断。五项研究测试了社会经济地位对社会痛苦判断的影响的竞争韧性和同理心预测。与移情分析一致,在所有研究中(Ncumulative=1046),低SES白人目标被认为比高SES白人对象对社会疼痛更敏感。此外,同理心介导了这些影响,因此参与者对低社会经济地位目标的同理心更强,并期望相对于高社会经济地位的目标有更多的社会痛苦。社会痛苦判断也为社会支持需求的判断提供了依据,因为低社会经济地位目标被认为比高社会经济地位对象需要更多的应对资源来管理伤害事件。目前的研究结果提供了初步证据,表明对低社会经济地位白人个体的移情关注提高了社会痛苦判断的敏感性,并增加了对低阶层白人个体的预期支持需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin is the official journal for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. The journal is an international outlet for original empirical papers in all areas of personality and social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信