Measurement models for visual working memory-A factorial model comparison.

IF 5.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
Klaus Oberauer
{"title":"Measurement models for visual working memory-A factorial model comparison.","authors":"Klaus Oberauer","doi":"10.1037/rev0000328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several measurement models have been proposed for data from the continuous-reproduction paradigm for studying visual working memory (WM): The original mixture model (Zhang & Luck, 2008) and its extension (Bays et al., 2009); the interference measurement model (IMM; Oberauer et al., 2017), and the target confusability competition (TCC) model (Schurgin et al., 2020). This article describes a space of possible measurement models in which all these models can be placed. The space is defined by three dimensions: (a) The choice of an activation function (von-Mises or Laplace), (b) the choice of a response-selection function (variants of Luce's choice rule or of signal-detection theory), (c) and whether or not memory precision is assumed to be a constant over manipulations affecting memory. A factorial combination of these three variables generates all possible models in the model space. Fitting all models to eight data sets revealed a new model as empirically most adequate, which combines a von-Mises activation function with a signal-detection response-selection rule. The precision parameter can be treated as a constant across many experimental manipulations, though it probably varies between individuals. All modeling code and the raw data modeled are available on the OSF: https://osf.io/zwprv/ (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":"130 3","pages":"841-852"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000328","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Several measurement models have been proposed for data from the continuous-reproduction paradigm for studying visual working memory (WM): The original mixture model (Zhang & Luck, 2008) and its extension (Bays et al., 2009); the interference measurement model (IMM; Oberauer et al., 2017), and the target confusability competition (TCC) model (Schurgin et al., 2020). This article describes a space of possible measurement models in which all these models can be placed. The space is defined by three dimensions: (a) The choice of an activation function (von-Mises or Laplace), (b) the choice of a response-selection function (variants of Luce's choice rule or of signal-detection theory), (c) and whether or not memory precision is assumed to be a constant over manipulations affecting memory. A factorial combination of these three variables generates all possible models in the model space. Fitting all models to eight data sets revealed a new model as empirically most adequate, which combines a von-Mises activation function with a signal-detection response-selection rule. The precision parameter can be treated as a constant across many experimental manipulations, though it probably varies between individuals. All modeling code and the raw data modeled are available on the OSF: https://osf.io/zwprv/ (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

视觉工作记忆的测量模型——析因模型比较。
对于研究视觉工作记忆(WM)的连续再现范式的数据,已经提出了几种测量模型:原始混合模型(Zhang & Luck, 2008)及其扩展(Bays et al., 2009);干涉测量模型(IMM);Oberauer et al., 2017)和目标混淆竞争(TCC)模型(Schurgin et al., 2020)。本文描述了一个可能的测量模型空间,所有这些模型都可以放置在其中。空间由三个维度定义:(a)激活函数的选择(von-Mises或Laplace), (b)响应选择函数的选择(Luce选择规则或信号检测理论的变体),(c)以及是否假设记忆精度是影响记忆的操作的常数。这三个变量的阶乘组合生成模型空间中所有可能的模型。将所有模型拟合到8个数据集,揭示了一个经验上最充分的新模型,该模型结合了von-Mises激活函数和信号检测响应选择规则。在许多实验操作中,精度参数可以被视为一个常数,尽管它可能因个体而异。所有建模代码和建模的原始数据都可以在OSF上获得:https://osf.io/zwprv/ (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological review
Psychological review 医学-心理学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Psychological Review publishes articles that make important theoretical contributions to any area of scientific psychology, including systematic evaluation of alternative theories.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信