Revisiting the benefits of isovolemic hemodilution red cell exchange for sickle cell disease

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Manasa S. Reddy, Ahmad Alkashash, Andrew Nord, Anne Tetrick
{"title":"Revisiting the benefits of isovolemic hemodilution red cell exchange for sickle cell disease","authors":"Manasa S. Reddy,&nbsp;Ahmad Alkashash,&nbsp;Andrew Nord,&nbsp;Anne Tetrick","doi":"10.1002/jca.22054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Isovolemic hemodilution red cell exchange (IHD-RCE) is a modified form of the standard red cell exchange (STD-RCE), intended to reduce red cell requirements in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). This retrospective crossover analysis of nine patients aims to add to the limited existing literature on IHD-RCE and address the equipoise regarding whether the benefits of (a) decreased RBC usage per exchange and (b) increased interprocedure interval (via lower fraction of cells remaining, FCR) can be observed at the same time, in the same patient.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>At a single center, we identified 37 patients with SCD undergoing chronic RCE between 2014 and 2021. We excluded those patients who did not have at least six consecutive procedures of each type (STD- and IHD-RCE), arriving at nine patients for analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>When using greater decreases in hematocrit than previously published, we did not find that IHD-RCE resulted in any clinically apparent adverse events. We did find greater decreases in diastolic blood pressure and increases in heart rate in some patients, as compared to STD-RCE. After correcting for total blood volume, seven of the nine patients had significantly reduced red cell requirements with each IHD-RCE. Because the pattern of achieving a lower FCR than programmed was seen to an equal extent with both IHD-RCE and STD-RCE, none of the nine patients showed any statistical difference in actual FCR between procedure types.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Our data do not support the observation of both IHD-RCE benefits, decreased red cell usage per exchange and lower FCR/increased interprocedure interval, simultaneously.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":"38 5","pages":"522-528"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jca.22054","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.22054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Isovolemic hemodilution red cell exchange (IHD-RCE) is a modified form of the standard red cell exchange (STD-RCE), intended to reduce red cell requirements in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). This retrospective crossover analysis of nine patients aims to add to the limited existing literature on IHD-RCE and address the equipoise regarding whether the benefits of (a) decreased RBC usage per exchange and (b) increased interprocedure interval (via lower fraction of cells remaining, FCR) can be observed at the same time, in the same patient.

Methods

At a single center, we identified 37 patients with SCD undergoing chronic RCE between 2014 and 2021. We excluded those patients who did not have at least six consecutive procedures of each type (STD- and IHD-RCE), arriving at nine patients for analysis.

Results

When using greater decreases in hematocrit than previously published, we did not find that IHD-RCE resulted in any clinically apparent adverse events. We did find greater decreases in diastolic blood pressure and increases in heart rate in some patients, as compared to STD-RCE. After correcting for total blood volume, seven of the nine patients had significantly reduced red cell requirements with each IHD-RCE. Because the pattern of achieving a lower FCR than programmed was seen to an equal extent with both IHD-RCE and STD-RCE, none of the nine patients showed any statistical difference in actual FCR between procedure types.

Discussion

Our data do not support the observation of both IHD-RCE benefits, decreased red cell usage per exchange and lower FCR/increased interprocedure interval, simultaneously.

回顾等容血液稀释红细胞交换对镰状细胞病的益处。
背景:等容血液稀释红细胞交换(IHD-RCE)是标准红细胞交换的一种改良形式,旨在降低镰状细胞病(SCD)患者对红细胞的需求。这项对9名患者的回顾性交叉分析旨在增加现有关于IHD-RCE的有限文献,并解决是否可以在同一患者中同时观察到(a)每次交换的RBC使用量减少和(b)过程间间隔增加(通过较低的剩余细胞分数,FCR)的益处的平衡。方法:在一个中心,我们确定了2014年至2021年间接受慢性RCE的37名SCD患者。我们排除了那些没有每种类型(STD和IHD-RCE)至少六次连续手术的患者,共有九名患者进行分析。结果:当使用比先前发表的更大的血细胞比容降低时,我们没有发现IHD-RCE导致任何临床上明显的不良事件。我们确实发现,与STD-RCE相比,一些患者的舒张压下降幅度更大,心率增加幅度更大。在校正总血容量后,九名患者中有七名患者的每一次IHD-RCE对红细胞的需求量都显著降低。由于IHD-RCE和STD-RCE的FCR低于程序设定的模式在同等程度上被观察到,因此九名患者中没有一名在不同手术类型之间的实际FCR显示出任何统计差异。讨论:我们的数据不支持同时观察到IHD-RCE的益处、每次交换红细胞使用量的减少和FCR/过程间隔的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信