Metal Hypersensitivity Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Case Series and Literature Review.

IF 2.1
Foot & ankle specialist Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-23 DOI:10.1177/19386400231162419
Albert T Anastasio, Abhinav R Balu, Lindsey Johnson, Bryan Crook, Selene G Parekh
{"title":"Metal Hypersensitivity Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Case Series and Literature Review.","authors":"Albert T Anastasio, Abhinav R Balu, Lindsey Johnson, Bryan Crook, Selene G Parekh","doi":"10.1177/19386400231162419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Metal hypersensitivity following total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is an underreported complication that can manifest as dermal, systematic, and orthopaedic-specific symptoms. It is critical to recognize that metal hypersensitivity is a diagnosis of exclusion; only after all other potential sources of failure, such as loosening or infection are ruled out, can this diagnosis be considered. Aside from imaging and common laboratory analysis, skin patch testing, leukocyte migration inhibition test (LMIT), and lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) are the testing options available for metal allergy. With regards to management of metal hypersensitivity, nonoperative modalities involving topical dermatological management are generally preferred. Severe cases of metal allergy may necessitate operative management consisting of explantation of the implant and either revision TAA with a custom hypoallergenic implant or conversion to an ankle fusion. We present 3 cases of presumed metal hypersensitivity following TAA. In all 3 cases, other forms of TAA failure were carefully ruled out. One patient underwent explantation and conversion to hypoallergenic implant, 1 patient underwent explantation and ankle arthrodesis with hypoallergenic hardware, and 1 patient elected for conservative care. In patients who underwent explantation and conversion to hypoallergenic hardware, no further symptoms associated with metal allergy were noted. Additional research is necessary to improve diagnostic accuracy of metal allergy and make treatment options more effective and accessible.<b>Level of Evidence:</b> Retrospective case series, IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"453-463"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400231162419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metal hypersensitivity following total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is an underreported complication that can manifest as dermal, systematic, and orthopaedic-specific symptoms. It is critical to recognize that metal hypersensitivity is a diagnosis of exclusion; only after all other potential sources of failure, such as loosening or infection are ruled out, can this diagnosis be considered. Aside from imaging and common laboratory analysis, skin patch testing, leukocyte migration inhibition test (LMIT), and lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) are the testing options available for metal allergy. With regards to management of metal hypersensitivity, nonoperative modalities involving topical dermatological management are generally preferred. Severe cases of metal allergy may necessitate operative management consisting of explantation of the implant and either revision TAA with a custom hypoallergenic implant or conversion to an ankle fusion. We present 3 cases of presumed metal hypersensitivity following TAA. In all 3 cases, other forms of TAA failure were carefully ruled out. One patient underwent explantation and conversion to hypoallergenic implant, 1 patient underwent explantation and ankle arthrodesis with hypoallergenic hardware, and 1 patient elected for conservative care. In patients who underwent explantation and conversion to hypoallergenic hardware, no further symptoms associated with metal allergy were noted. Additional research is necessary to improve diagnostic accuracy of metal allergy and make treatment options more effective and accessible.Level of Evidence: Retrospective case series, IV.

全踝关节置换术后金属过敏:病例系列和文献回顾。
全踝关节置换术(TAA)后金属过敏是一种未被报道的并发症,可表现为皮肤、全身和骨科特异性症状。认识到金属过敏是一种排除性诊断是至关重要的;只有在排除了所有其他潜在的故障来源,如松动或感染后,才能考虑这种诊断。除了成像和常见的实验室分析,皮肤贴片试验、白细胞迁移抑制试验(LMIT)和淋巴细胞转化试验(LTT)是可用于金属过敏的测试选择。关于金属超敏反应的处理,非手术方式包括局部皮肤科管理通常是首选。严重的金属过敏病例可能需要手术治疗,包括取出植入物并使用定制的低过敏性植入物进行翻修TAA或转换为踝关节融合。我们报告3例TAA术后推定的金属过敏。在所有3例病例中,仔细排除了其他形式的TAA失败。1例患者行植入术并转化为低过敏性植入物,1例患者行植入术并结合低过敏性植入物进行踝关节融合术,1例患者选择保守治疗。在接受移植和转换为低过敏性硬体的患者中,没有发现与金属过敏相关的进一步症状。需要进一步的研究来提高金属过敏的诊断准确性,并使治疗方案更有效和更容易获得。证据水平:回顾性病例系列,IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信