Assessing the Surface Modifications of Contaminated Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Implants Through Diode Lasers of Different Wavelengths: An In Vitro Study.

Meshkat Naeimi Darestani, Behzad Houshmand, Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Mohammadreza Talebi
{"title":"Assessing the Surface Modifications of Contaminated Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Implants Through Diode Lasers of Different Wavelengths: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.","authors":"Meshkat Naeimi Darestani,&nbsp;Behzad Houshmand,&nbsp;Seyed Ali Mosaddad,&nbsp;Mohammadreza Talebi","doi":"10.1089/photob.2023.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> The present study was conducted to compare the effects of 810 nm, 980 nm, and dual (810: 50%-980: 50%) diode lasers on the surface modifications of implants contaminated by a standard strain of <i>Escherichia coli</i>. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Based on the operation on their surface, the implants were divided into six groups: \"Group 1\" was the positive control group undergoing no specific procedures. \"Groups 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6\" were contaminated by a standard strain of <i>E. coli</i>; \"Group 2\" was also set as the negative control group. \"Groups 3, 4, and 5\" were irradiated by 810 nm, 980 nm, and dual lasers (810: 50%-980: 50%; 1.5W, 320 μm fiber) for 30 sec, respectively. \"Group 6\" was treated using standard titanium brushes. All groups were examined to evaluate the surface modifications by the X-ray diffraction analysis, scanning electron microscope, and atomic force microscopy. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The values of carbon, oxygen, aluminum, titanium, and vanadium were significantly different in the surface composition of the contaminated implants from the control groups (<i>p</i> = 0.010, 0.033, 0.044, 0.016, and 0.037, respectively). In all target areas, there were significant differences in surface roughness (<i>p</i> < 0.0001); the same was also true about the pairwise comparison of the study groups (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). \"Group 5\" demonstrated lower morphological surface changes and roughness degrees. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Overall, laser irradiation could alter the surfaces of the contaminated implants. Titanium brushes and 810/980 nm lasers resulted in similar morphological alterations. Dual lasers enjoyed the least degree of morphological alterations and surface roughness.</p>","PeriodicalId":20111,"journal":{"name":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","volume":"41 5","pages":"201-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2023.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: The present study was conducted to compare the effects of 810 nm, 980 nm, and dual (810: 50%-980: 50%) diode lasers on the surface modifications of implants contaminated by a standard strain of Escherichia coli. Methods: Based on the operation on their surface, the implants were divided into six groups: "Group 1" was the positive control group undergoing no specific procedures. "Groups 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6" were contaminated by a standard strain of E. coli; "Group 2" was also set as the negative control group. "Groups 3, 4, and 5" were irradiated by 810 nm, 980 nm, and dual lasers (810: 50%-980: 50%; 1.5W, 320 μm fiber) for 30 sec, respectively. "Group 6" was treated using standard titanium brushes. All groups were examined to evaluate the surface modifications by the X-ray diffraction analysis, scanning electron microscope, and atomic force microscopy. Results: The values of carbon, oxygen, aluminum, titanium, and vanadium were significantly different in the surface composition of the contaminated implants from the control groups (p = 0.010, 0.033, 0.044, 0.016, and 0.037, respectively). In all target areas, there were significant differences in surface roughness (p < 0.0001); the same was also true about the pairwise comparison of the study groups (p < 0.0001). "Group 5" demonstrated lower morphological surface changes and roughness degrees. Conclusions: Overall, laser irradiation could alter the surfaces of the contaminated implants. Titanium brushes and 810/980 nm lasers resulted in similar morphological alterations. Dual lasers enjoyed the least degree of morphological alterations and surface roughness.

利用不同波长二极管激光评估污染喷砂和酸蚀植入物的表面修饰:一项体外研究。
目的:比较810 nm、980 nm和双波长(810:50% ~ 980:50%)二极管激光器对大肠杆菌标准菌株污染植体表面修饰的影响。方法:根据种植体表面操作情况,将种植体分为6组:“1组”为阳性对照组,无特殊手术。“第2、3、4、5和6组”被一种标准大肠杆菌菌株污染;另设“第二组”为阴性对照组。“3、4、5组”分别用810 nm、980 nm和双激光照射(810:50% ~ 980:50%;1.5W, 320 μm光纤),分别维持30秒。第6组采用标准钛刷处理。通过x射线衍射分析、扫描电子显微镜和原子力显微镜检查所有组的表面修饰。结果:污染种植体表面碳、氧、铝、钛、钒的含量与对照组差异有统计学意义(p值分别为0.010、0.033、0.044、0.016、0.037)。结论:总的来说,激光照射可以改变污染种植体的表面。钛刷和810/980 nm激光产生了相似的形态变化。双激光器具有最小程度的形态变化和表面粗糙度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信