Immediate-release tablet formulation of rebamipide and a pharmacokinetic study in healthy human subjects.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yong-Hoon Won, Yoon Tae Goo, Gi Hyeong Sin, Sun Ho Hong, Chang Hyun Kim, Min-Ju Kim, Tae Hwa Lee, Young Wook Choi
{"title":"Immediate-release tablet formulation of rebamipide and a pharmacokinetic study in healthy human subjects.","authors":"Yong-Hoon Won,&nbsp;Yoon Tae Goo,&nbsp;Gi Hyeong Sin,&nbsp;Sun Ho Hong,&nbsp;Chang Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Min-Ju Kim,&nbsp;Tae Hwa Lee,&nbsp;Young Wook Choi","doi":"10.5414/CP204329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop an immediate-release tablet preparation containing rebamipide (RBM) and perform the bioavailability assessment in the healthy human subjects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Raw RBM powder was characterized using differential scanning calorimetry, powder X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RBM tablets were manufactured by the wet granulation method, and their dissolution behavior was compared with the reference tablet (Mucosta). A phase I study (n = 47; sequence-randomized, open-label, single-dose, and two-way cross-over design) was designed for oral administration of a test formulation (F4) and Mucosta to healthy human male subjects, and pharmacokinetic parameters including the maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and area under the curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC<sub>0-12h</sub>) were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RBM powder had a multimodal size distribution with typical crystallinity, and the needle-like and elongated morphologies of RBM were visualized using SEM. Various tablet formulations (F1 - F6) were successfully manufactured using wet granulation method. F4 formulation was selected based on the dissolution profile most equivalent to that of Mucosta. F4 was stable for 6 months under accelerated and long-term storage conditions. Based on one-way analysis of variance, the AUC<sub>0-12h</sub> (F(1,92) = 2.40, p = 0.13) and t<sub>max</sub> (F(1,92) = 0.04, p = 0.85) were not significantly different; however, the C<sub>max</sub> (F(1,92) = 5.45, p = 0.022) showed significant difference between F4 and reference tablets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite similar in vitro dissolution profiles, in vivo pharmacokinetic results revealed a partial difference between F4 and reference tablets. Thus, further study on formulation development is still needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13963,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":"61 6","pages":"273-288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop an immediate-release tablet preparation containing rebamipide (RBM) and perform the bioavailability assessment in the healthy human subjects.

Materials and methods: Raw RBM powder was characterized using differential scanning calorimetry, powder X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RBM tablets were manufactured by the wet granulation method, and their dissolution behavior was compared with the reference tablet (Mucosta). A phase I study (n = 47; sequence-randomized, open-label, single-dose, and two-way cross-over design) was designed for oral administration of a test formulation (F4) and Mucosta to healthy human male subjects, and pharmacokinetic parameters including the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC0-12h) were compared.

Results: RBM powder had a multimodal size distribution with typical crystallinity, and the needle-like and elongated morphologies of RBM were visualized using SEM. Various tablet formulations (F1 - F6) were successfully manufactured using wet granulation method. F4 formulation was selected based on the dissolution profile most equivalent to that of Mucosta. F4 was stable for 6 months under accelerated and long-term storage conditions. Based on one-way analysis of variance, the AUC0-12h (F(1,92) = 2.40, p = 0.13) and tmax (F(1,92) = 0.04, p = 0.85) were not significantly different; however, the Cmax (F(1,92) = 5.45, p = 0.022) showed significant difference between F4 and reference tablets.

Conclusion: Despite similar in vitro dissolution profiles, in vivo pharmacokinetic results revealed a partial difference between F4 and reference tablets. Thus, further study on formulation development is still needed.

利巴米胺速释片配方及健康人体内药代动力学研究。
目的:研制一种含利巴米胺的速释片制剂,并对其进行人体生物利用度评价。材料和方法:采用差示扫描量热法、粉末x射线衍射法和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对RBM原料粉末进行了表征。采用湿造粒法制备RBM片,并与参比片Mucosta进行溶出行为比较。一期研究(n = 47;设计序列随机、开放标签、单剂量、双向交叉设计,对健康男性受试者口服试验制剂(F4)和Mucosta,比较0 ~ 12h最大血药浓度(Cmax)和曲线下面积(auc0 ~ 12h)等药代动力学参数。结果:RBM粉末具有多模态粒度分布,具有典型的结晶度,通过扫描电镜观察到RBM的针状和细长形貌。采用湿造粒法成功制备了多种片剂配方(F1 - F6)。根据与Mucosta溶出度最接近的条件选择F4配方。F4在加速和长期储存条件下可稳定保存6个月。经单因素方差分析,AUC0-12h (F(1,92) = 2.40, p = 0.13)和tmax (F(1,92) = 0.04, p = 0.85)差异无统计学意义;而F4与参比片的Cmax (F(1,92) = 5.45, p = 0.022)差异有统计学意义。结论:尽管体外溶出度相似,但体内药代动力学结果显示F4与参比片存在部分差异。因此,还需要进一步研究配方开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics appears monthly and publishes manuscripts containing original material with emphasis on the following topics: Clinical trials, Pharmacoepidemiology - Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacodynamics, Drug disposition and Pharmacokinetics, Quality assurance, Pharmacogenetics, Biotechnological drugs such as cytokines and recombinant antibiotics. Case reports on adverse reactions are also of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信