Orbital wall restoration with primary bone fragments in complex orbital fractures.

Q2 Medicine
Jong Hyun Park, Dong Hee Kang, Hong Bae Jeon, Hyonsurk Kim
{"title":"Orbital wall restoration with primary bone fragments in complex orbital fractures.","authors":"Jong Hyun Park,&nbsp;Dong Hee Kang,&nbsp;Hong Bae Jeon,&nbsp;Hyonsurk Kim","doi":"10.7181/acfs.2022.01116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complex orbital fractures are impure orbital fractures because they involve the orbital walls and mid-facial bones. The author reported an orbital wall restoration technique in which the primary orbital wall fragments were restored to their prior position in complex orbital fractures in 2020. As a follow-up to a previous preliminary study, this study retrospectively reviewed the surgical results of complex orbital wall fractures over a 4-year period and compared the surgical outcomes by dividing them into groups with and without balloon restoration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of 939 patients with facial bone fractures between August 2018 and August 2022 were reviewed. Of these, 154 had complex orbital fractures. Among them, 44 and 110 underwent reduction with and without the balloon technique respectively. Pre- and postoperative Naugle exophthalmometer (Good-Lite Co.) scales were evaluated. The orbital volume and orbital volume ratio were calculated from preoperative and 6 months postoperative computed tomography images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 154 patients with complex orbital fractures, 44 patients underwent restoration with the balloon technique, and 110 patients underwent restoration without it. The Naugle scale did not differ significantly between the two groups, but the orbital volume ratio significantly decreased by 3.32% and 2.39% in groups with and without the balloon technique and the difference in OVR was significantly greater in patients in the balloon restoration group compared with the control group. Postoperative balloon rupture occurred in six out of 44 cases (13.64%). None of the six patients with balloon rupture showed significant enophthalmos at 6 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The balloon rupture rate was 13.64% (6/44 cases) with marginal screw fixation, blunt screws, and extra protection with a resorbable foam dressing. Furthermore, we restored the orbital wall with primary orbital fragments using balloon support in complex orbital wall fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":52238,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/48/ed/acfs-2022-01116.PMC10165238.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2022.01116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Complex orbital fractures are impure orbital fractures because they involve the orbital walls and mid-facial bones. The author reported an orbital wall restoration technique in which the primary orbital wall fragments were restored to their prior position in complex orbital fractures in 2020. As a follow-up to a previous preliminary study, this study retrospectively reviewed the surgical results of complex orbital wall fractures over a 4-year period and compared the surgical outcomes by dividing them into groups with and without balloon restoration.

Methods: Data of 939 patients with facial bone fractures between August 2018 and August 2022 were reviewed. Of these, 154 had complex orbital fractures. Among them, 44 and 110 underwent reduction with and without the balloon technique respectively. Pre- and postoperative Naugle exophthalmometer (Good-Lite Co.) scales were evaluated. The orbital volume and orbital volume ratio were calculated from preoperative and 6 months postoperative computed tomography images.

Results: Among 154 patients with complex orbital fractures, 44 patients underwent restoration with the balloon technique, and 110 patients underwent restoration without it. The Naugle scale did not differ significantly between the two groups, but the orbital volume ratio significantly decreased by 3.32% and 2.39% in groups with and without the balloon technique and the difference in OVR was significantly greater in patients in the balloon restoration group compared with the control group. Postoperative balloon rupture occurred in six out of 44 cases (13.64%). None of the six patients with balloon rupture showed significant enophthalmos at 6 months of follow-up.

Conclusion: The balloon rupture rate was 13.64% (6/44 cases) with marginal screw fixation, blunt screws, and extra protection with a resorbable foam dressing. Furthermore, we restored the orbital wall with primary orbital fragments using balloon support in complex orbital wall fractures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

复杂眶壁骨折一期骨碎片修复。
背景:复杂的眶骨折是不纯粹的眶骨折,因为它累及眶壁和面中骨。作者报告了一种眶壁修复技术,在2020年将复杂眶骨折的初级眶壁碎片恢复到原来的位置。作为先前初步研究的随访,本研究回顾性回顾了4年来复杂眶壁骨折的手术结果,并将手术结果分为有球囊修复组和无球囊修复组进行比较。方法:回顾性分析2018年8月至2022年8月939例面部骨折患者的资料。其中,154例有复杂的眼眶骨折。其中44例和110例分别采用球囊复位和不采用球囊复位。对术前和术后诺格眼差计(Good-Lite Co.)量表进行评估。根据术前和术后6个月的计算机断层图像计算眼眶体积和眼眶体积比。结果:154例复杂眶骨折患者中,44例采用球囊技术复位,110例未采用球囊技术复位。两组间的Naugle评分差异无统计学意义,但球囊修复组与未球囊修复组眼眶体积比分别显著降低3.32%和2.39%,球囊修复组患者的OVR与对照组相比差异显著较大。44例术后球囊破裂6例(13.64%)。随访6个月,6例球囊破裂患者均无明显内陷。结论:采用边缘螺钉固定,钝螺钉固定,并用可吸收泡沫敷料进行额外保护,球囊破裂率为13.64%(6/44例)。此外,在复杂的眶壁骨折中,我们使用球囊支架修复眶壁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Craniofacial Surgery
Archives of Craniofacial Surgery Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信