Reliability and validity of pose estimation algorithm for measurement of knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Yoshitomo Saiki, Tamon Kabata, Tomohiro Ojima, Yoshitomo Kajino, Naoyuki Kubo, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
{"title":"Reliability and validity of pose estimation algorithm for measurement of knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Yoshitomo Saiki,&nbsp;Tamon Kabata,&nbsp;Tomohiro Ojima,&nbsp;Yoshitomo Kajino,&nbsp;Naoyuki Kubo,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Tsuchiya","doi":"10.1302/2046-3758.125.BJR-2022-0257.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to assess the reliability and validity of OpenPose, a posture estimation algorithm, for measurement of knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), in comparison to radiography and goniometry. In this prospective observational study, we analyzed 35 primary TKAs (24 patients) for knee osteoarthritis. We measured the knee angles in flexion and extension using OpenPose, radiography, and goniometry. We assessed the test-retest reliability of each method using intraclass correlation coefficient (1,1). We evaluated the ability to estimate other measurement values from the OpenPose value using linear regression analysis. We used intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) and Bland-Altman analyses to evaluate the agreement and error between radiography and the other measurements. OpenPose had excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (1,1) = 1.000). The R<sup>2</sup> of all regression models indicated large correlations (0.747 to 0.927). In the flexion position, the intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) of OpenPose indicated excellent agreement (0.953) with radiography. In the extension position, the intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) indicated good agreement of OpenPose and radiography (0.815) and moderate agreement of goniometry with radiography (0.593). OpenPose had no systematic error in the flexion position, and a 2.3° fixed error in the extension position, compared to radiography. OpenPose is a reliable and valid tool for measuring flexion and extension positions after TKA. It has better accuracy than goniometry, especially in the extension position. Accurate measurement values can be obtained with low error, high reproducibility, and no contact, independent of the examiner's skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":9074,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/38/94/BJR-12-2046-3758.125.BJR-2022-0257.R1.PMC10164488.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.125.BJR-2022-0257.R1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to assess the reliability and validity of OpenPose, a posture estimation algorithm, for measurement of knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), in comparison to radiography and goniometry. In this prospective observational study, we analyzed 35 primary TKAs (24 patients) for knee osteoarthritis. We measured the knee angles in flexion and extension using OpenPose, radiography, and goniometry. We assessed the test-retest reliability of each method using intraclass correlation coefficient (1,1). We evaluated the ability to estimate other measurement values from the OpenPose value using linear regression analysis. We used intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) and Bland-Altman analyses to evaluate the agreement and error between radiography and the other measurements. OpenPose had excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (1,1) = 1.000). The R2 of all regression models indicated large correlations (0.747 to 0.927). In the flexion position, the intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) of OpenPose indicated excellent agreement (0.953) with radiography. In the extension position, the intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) indicated good agreement of OpenPose and radiography (0.815) and moderate agreement of goniometry with radiography (0.593). OpenPose had no systematic error in the flexion position, and a 2.3° fixed error in the extension position, compared to radiography. OpenPose is a reliable and valid tool for measuring flexion and extension positions after TKA. It has better accuracy than goniometry, especially in the extension position. Accurate measurement values can be obtained with low error, high reproducibility, and no contact, independent of the examiner's skills.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

全膝关节置换术后膝关节活动度测量的位姿估计算法的可靠性和有效性。
我们的目的是评估OpenPose的可靠性和有效性,这是一种姿势估计算法,用于测量全膝关节置换术(TKA)后膝关节运动范围,与x线摄影和角度测量相比较。在这项前瞻性观察研究中,我们分析了35例膝关节骨关节炎的原发性tka(24例患者)。我们使用OpenPose、x线摄影和角度测量法测量膝关节屈伸角度。我们使用类内相关系数(1,1)评估每种方法的重测信度。我们使用线性回归分析评估了从OpenPose值估计其他测量值的能力。我们使用类内相关系数(2,1)和Bland-Altman分析来评估x线摄影与其他测量之间的一致性和误差。OpenPose具有优异的重测信度(类内相关系数(1,1)= 1.000)。各回归模型的R2均具有较大的相关性(0.747 ~ 0.927)。在屈曲体位时,OpenPose的类内相关系数(2,1)与x线片吻合良好(0.953)。在伸展位置,类内相关系数(2,1)表明OpenPose与x线摄影的一致性较好(0.815),角度测量与x线摄影的一致性中等(0.593)。与x线摄影相比,OpenPose在屈曲位上没有系统误差,在伸展位上有2.3°的固定误差。OpenPose是一种可靠有效的测量TKA后屈伸位置的工具。它比几何测量法有更好的精度,特别是在延伸位置。准确的测量值可以获得低误差,高再现性,无接触,独立于审查员的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Research
Bone & Joint Research CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING-ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
23.90%
发文量
156
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The gold open access journal for the musculoskeletal sciences. Included in PubMed and available in PubMed Central.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信