Endoscopic Ultrasound Predicts Risk of Occult Intra-Abdominal Metastases in Localized Gastric Cancer: A Validation Study.

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Fares Ayoub, Christopher G Chapman, Heather Chen, Namrata Setia, Kevin Roggin, Uzma D Siddiqui
{"title":"Endoscopic Ultrasound Predicts Risk of Occult Intra-Abdominal Metastases in Localized Gastric Cancer: A Validation Study.","authors":"Fares Ayoub,&nbsp;Christopher G Chapman,&nbsp;Heather Chen,&nbsp;Namrata Setia,&nbsp;Kevin Roggin,&nbsp;Uzma D Siddiqui","doi":"10.14740/gr1589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In gastric cancer (GC) patients without imaging evidence of distant metastasis, diagnostic staging laparoscopy (DSL) is recommended to detect radiographically occult peritoneal metastasis (M1). DSL carries a risk for morbidity and its cost-effectiveness is unclear. Use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) to improve patient selection for DSL has been proposed but not validated. We aimed to validate an EUS-based risk classification system predicting risk for M1 disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified all GC patients without positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) evidence of distant metastasis who underwent staging EUS followed by DSL between 2010 and 2020. T1-2, N0 disease was EUS \"low-risk\"; T3-4 and/or N+ disease was \"high-risk\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 68 patients met inclusion criteria. DSL identified radiographically occult M1 disease in 17 patients (25%). Most patients had EUS T3 tumors (n = 59, 87%) and 48 (71%) patients were node-positive (N+). Five (7%) patients were classified EUS \"low-risk\" and 63 (93%) were classified \"high-risk\". Of 63 \"high-risk\" patients, 17 (27%) had M1 disease. The ability of \"low-risk\" EUS to predict M0 disease at laparoscopy was 100% and DSL would have been avoided in five patients (7%). This stratification algorithm showed a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval (CI): 80.5-100%) and a specificity of 9.8% (95% CI: 3.3-21.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of an EUS-based risk classification system in GC patients without imaging evidence of metastasis helps identify a subset of patients at low-risk for laparoscopic M1 disease who may avoid DSL and proceed directly to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or resection with curative intent. Larger, prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12461,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/96/04/gr-16-009.PMC9990533.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In gastric cancer (GC) patients without imaging evidence of distant metastasis, diagnostic staging laparoscopy (DSL) is recommended to detect radiographically occult peritoneal metastasis (M1). DSL carries a risk for morbidity and its cost-effectiveness is unclear. Use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) to improve patient selection for DSL has been proposed but not validated. We aimed to validate an EUS-based risk classification system predicting risk for M1 disease.

Methods: We retrospectively identified all GC patients without positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) evidence of distant metastasis who underwent staging EUS followed by DSL between 2010 and 2020. T1-2, N0 disease was EUS "low-risk"; T3-4 and/or N+ disease was "high-risk".

Results: A total of 68 patients met inclusion criteria. DSL identified radiographically occult M1 disease in 17 patients (25%). Most patients had EUS T3 tumors (n = 59, 87%) and 48 (71%) patients were node-positive (N+). Five (7%) patients were classified EUS "low-risk" and 63 (93%) were classified "high-risk". Of 63 "high-risk" patients, 17 (27%) had M1 disease. The ability of "low-risk" EUS to predict M0 disease at laparoscopy was 100% and DSL would have been avoided in five patients (7%). This stratification algorithm showed a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval (CI): 80.5-100%) and a specificity of 9.8% (95% CI: 3.3-21.4%).

Conclusions: Use of an EUS-based risk classification system in GC patients without imaging evidence of metastasis helps identify a subset of patients at low-risk for laparoscopic M1 disease who may avoid DSL and proceed directly to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or resection with curative intent. Larger, prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

内镜超声预测局部胃癌腹内转移风险:一项验证研究。
背景:在没有远处转移影像学证据的胃癌(GC)患者中,建议采用腹腔镜诊断分期(DSL)来检测影像学上隐匿性腹膜转移(M1)。DSL有发病风险,其成本效益尚不清楚。使用内镜超声(EUS)来改善DSL患者的选择已被提出,但尚未得到验证。我们的目的是验证以欧洲为基础的预测M1疾病风险的风险分类系统。方法:我们回顾性研究了2010年至2020年间所有没有正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/计算机断层扫描(CT)远处转移证据的分期EUS和DSL的GC患者。T1-2,无EUS“低危”病例;T3-4和/或N+疾病为“高危”。结果:共有68例患者符合纳入标准。DSL在17例(25%)患者中发现了影像学上隐匿的M1疾病。大多数患者为EUS T3肿瘤(n = 59, 87%), 48例(71%)患者为淋巴结阳性(n +)。5例(7%)患者被归为EUS“低危”,63例(93%)患者被归为“高危”。在63例“高危”患者中,17例(27%)患有M1疾病。“低风险”EUS在腹腔镜下预测M0疾病的能力为100%,5例患者(7%)可以避免DSL。该分层算法的灵敏度为100%(95%置信区间(CI): 80.5-100%),特异性为9.8% (95% CI: 3.3-21.4%)。结论:在没有影像学转移证据的胃癌患者中使用基于eus的风险分类系统有助于识别低风险的腹腔镜M1疾病患者亚群,这些患者可以避免DSL并直接进行新辅助化疗或以治愈为目的的切除术。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastroenterology Research
Gastroenterology Research GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信