Women with PTSD and Substance Use Disorders in a Research Treatment Study: A Comparison of those with and without the Dissociative Subtype of PTSD.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-20 DOI:10.1080/15299732.2022.2136327
Therese K Killeen, Timothy D Brewerton
{"title":"Women with PTSD and Substance Use Disorders in a Research Treatment Study: A Comparison of those with and without the Dissociative Subtype of PTSD.","authors":"Therese K Killeen, Timothy D Brewerton","doi":"10.1080/15299732.2022.2136327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Significant differences in clinical features have been reported in women with substance use disorders (SUDs) between those with the dissociative subtype of posttraumatic stress disorder (D-PTSD) compared to those without, namely more severe trauma histories, PTSD symptoms, and general psychopathology. This presentation reports on a group of 88 women with PTSD and SUD taking part in a research treatment study. All women were assessed using the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) and were categorized into those with (n = 23, 26%) and without (n = 65, 74%) D-PTSD. Assessments for SUDs were via the Multi-International Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Seventh Version (MINI-7). Compared to those without D-PTSD, those with D-PTSD had significantly higher CAPS-5 scores (50.5 ± 9.9 v. 39.6 ± 8.8), greater number of PTSD symptoms (16.4 ± 2.6 v. 14.2 ± 2.4), more alcohol use disorder (AUD) (65.2% v. 30.8%), and more non-cocaine stimulant use disorder (34.8% v. 12.3%). No significant differences were found for other SUDs. These women with SUDs and D-PTSD have higher degrees of PTSD severity as well as unique clinical presentations. Future research is needed to explore the significance of these findings for clinical assessment and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":47476,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2022.2136327","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significant differences in clinical features have been reported in women with substance use disorders (SUDs) between those with the dissociative subtype of posttraumatic stress disorder (D-PTSD) compared to those without, namely more severe trauma histories, PTSD symptoms, and general psychopathology. This presentation reports on a group of 88 women with PTSD and SUD taking part in a research treatment study. All women were assessed using the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) and were categorized into those with (n = 23, 26%) and without (n = 65, 74%) D-PTSD. Assessments for SUDs were via the Multi-International Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Seventh Version (MINI-7). Compared to those without D-PTSD, those with D-PTSD had significantly higher CAPS-5 scores (50.5 ± 9.9 v. 39.6 ± 8.8), greater number of PTSD symptoms (16.4 ± 2.6 v. 14.2 ± 2.4), more alcohol use disorder (AUD) (65.2% v. 30.8%), and more non-cocaine stimulant use disorder (34.8% v. 12.3%). No significant differences were found for other SUDs. These women with SUDs and D-PTSD have higher degrees of PTSD severity as well as unique clinical presentations. Future research is needed to explore the significance of these findings for clinical assessment and treatment.

研究治疗中患有创伤后应激障碍和药物使用障碍的女性:创伤后应激障碍分离亚型患者与非分离亚型患者的比较。
据报道,在患有药物滥用障碍(SUD)的女性患者中,具有创伤后应激障碍分离亚型(D-PTSD)的患者与不具有该亚型的患者在临床特征上存在显著差异,即具有更严重的创伤史、创伤后应激障碍症状和一般精神病理学特征。本报告介绍了 88 名患有创伤后应激障碍和分裂型精神障碍的女性参与研究治疗的情况。所有女性都接受了 DSM-5 临床医师创伤后应激障碍量表(CAPS-5)的评估,并被分为患有(23 人,占 26%)和未患有(65 人,占 74%)D-PTSD 的两类。对 SUDs 的评估采用的是第七版多国神经精神量表(MINI-7)。与非 D-PTSD 患者相比,D-PTSD 患者的 CAPS-5 评分明显更高(50.5 ± 9.9 v. 39.6 ± 8.8),创伤后应激障碍症状数量更多(16.4 ± 2.6 v. 14.2 ± 2.4),酒精使用障碍 (AUD) 更多(65.2% v. 30.8%),非可卡因兴奋剂使用障碍更多(34.8% v. 12.3%)。在其他 SUDs 方面没有发现明显的差异。这些患有 SUDs 和 D-PTSD 的女性创伤后应激障碍的严重程度更高,临床表现也更独特。未来的研究需要探讨这些发现对临床评估和治疗的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信