Can root pulp visibility in mandibular first molars be used as an alternative age marker at the 16 year threshold in the absence of mandibular third molars: an orthopantomographic study in a South Indian sample.

Q3 Medicine
S Manthapuri, S R Bheemanapalli, L P Namburu, S Kunchala, D Vankdoth, S B Balla, V L Bathala, A L Kasabu
{"title":"Can root pulp visibility in mandibular first molars be used as an alternative age marker at the 16 year threshold in the absence of mandibular third molars: an orthopantomographic study in a South Indian sample.","authors":"S Manthapuri,&nbsp;S R Bheemanapalli,&nbsp;L P Namburu,&nbsp;S Kunchala,&nbsp;D Vankdoth,&nbsp;S B Balla,&nbsp;V L Bathala,&nbsp;A L Kasabu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In many countries, the 16 years of age threshold is considered to be legally relevant according to the law. This research aims to ascertain the sensitivity and specificity of Olze et al. stages of root pulp visibility (RPV) in a sample of 760 south Indian children aged between 12 and 20 years, with an age threshold of 16 years, using receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC). Spearman's rho correlation showed a strong positive correlation between the RPV stages and age. No significant difference between the right and left lower first molars was seen. RPV Stage 2 showed the highest AUC in both females (0.813) and males (0.790). The performance of the RPV Stage 2 to discriminate the legal age threshold of 16 years resulted in the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy values of 0.61, 0.96 and 0.77 in males, 0.65, 0.97 and 0.80 in females. It resulted in 3.6% and 2.9% of false positives and 38.5% and 34.5% of false negatives in both sexes. Even though, RPV Stage 2 can discriminate reasonably well between two age categories, due to the high percentage of false negatives we recommend its use in conjunction with other age estimation methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":35728,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630453/pdf/JFOS-39-2-21.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many countries, the 16 years of age threshold is considered to be legally relevant according to the law. This research aims to ascertain the sensitivity and specificity of Olze et al. stages of root pulp visibility (RPV) in a sample of 760 south Indian children aged between 12 and 20 years, with an age threshold of 16 years, using receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC). Spearman's rho correlation showed a strong positive correlation between the RPV stages and age. No significant difference between the right and left lower first molars was seen. RPV Stage 2 showed the highest AUC in both females (0.813) and males (0.790). The performance of the RPV Stage 2 to discriminate the legal age threshold of 16 years resulted in the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy values of 0.61, 0.96 and 0.77 in males, 0.65, 0.97 and 0.80 in females. It resulted in 3.6% and 2.9% of false positives and 38.5% and 34.5% of false negatives in both sexes. Even though, RPV Stage 2 can discriminate reasonably well between two age categories, due to the high percentage of false negatives we recommend its use in conjunction with other age estimation methods.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在没有下颌第三磨牙的情况下,下颌第一磨牙的根髓可见性是否可以作为16岁阈值的替代年龄标记:一项南印度样本的矫形断层研究。
在许多国家,根据法律,16岁的年龄门槛被认为具有法律意义。本研究旨在利用受试者工作特征曲线和曲线下面积(AUC),确定760名年龄在12 - 20岁、年龄阈值为16岁的南印度儿童样本中Olze等人的根髓可见性分期(RPV)的敏感性和特异性。Spearman’s rho相关显示RPV分期与年龄呈正相关。左、右下第一磨牙无明显差异。RPV期2的AUC最高,女性为0.813,男性为0.790。RPV第二阶段区分16岁的法定年龄阈值,男性的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为0.61、0.96和0.77,女性为0.65、0.97和0.80。男女假阳性分别为3.6%和2.9%,假阴性分别为38.5%和34.5%。尽管RPV阶段2可以很好地区分两个年龄类别,但由于假阴性率很高,我们建议将其与其他年龄估计方法结合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology
Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology is the official publication of the: INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION FOR FORENSIC ODONTO-STOMATOLOGY (I.O.F.O.S
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信