The Role of Habit Formation and Automaticity in Diabetes Self-Management: Current Evidence and Future Applications.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Jenine Y Stone, Lindsay S Mayberry, Kate Clouse, Shelagh Mulvaney
{"title":"The Role of Habit Formation and Automaticity in Diabetes Self-Management: Current Evidence and Future Applications.","authors":"Jenine Y Stone,&nbsp;Lindsay S Mayberry,&nbsp;Kate Clouse,&nbsp;Shelagh Mulvaney","doi":"10.1007/s11892-023-01499-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Diabetes is a chronic condition that requires consistent self-management for optimal health outcomes. People with diabetes are prone to burnout, cognitive burden, and sub-optimal performance of self-management tasks. Interventions that focus on habit formation have the potential to increase engagement by facilitating automaticity of self-management task performance. The purpose of this review is to (1) clarify the conceptualizations of habit formation and behavioral automaticity in the context of health behavior interventions, (2) review the evidence of habit in relation to behaviors relevant to diabetes self-management, and (3) discuss opportunities for incorporating habit formation and automaticity into diabetes self-management interventions.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Modern habit research describes a habit as a behavior that results over time from an automatic mental process. Automatic behaviors are experienced as cue-dependent, goal-independent, unconscious, and efficient. Habit formation requires context-dependent repetition to form cue-behavior associations. Results of diabetes habit studies are mixed. Observational studies have shown positive associations between habit strength and target self-management behaviors such as taking medication and monitoring blood glucose, as well as glycemic outcomes such as HbA1c. However, intervention studies conducted in similar populations have not demonstrated a significant benefit of habit-forming interventions compared to controls, possibly due to varying techniques used to promote habit formation. Automaticity of self-management behaviors has the potential to minimize the burden associated with performance of self-management tasks and ultimately improve outcomes for people with diabetes. Future studies should focus on refining interventions focused on context-dependent repetition to promote habit formation and better measurement of habit automaticity in diabetes self-management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10898,"journal":{"name":"Current Diabetes Reports","volume":"23 4","pages":"43-58"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Diabetes Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-023-01499-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose of review: Diabetes is a chronic condition that requires consistent self-management for optimal health outcomes. People with diabetes are prone to burnout, cognitive burden, and sub-optimal performance of self-management tasks. Interventions that focus on habit formation have the potential to increase engagement by facilitating automaticity of self-management task performance. The purpose of this review is to (1) clarify the conceptualizations of habit formation and behavioral automaticity in the context of health behavior interventions, (2) review the evidence of habit in relation to behaviors relevant to diabetes self-management, and (3) discuss opportunities for incorporating habit formation and automaticity into diabetes self-management interventions.

Recent findings: Modern habit research describes a habit as a behavior that results over time from an automatic mental process. Automatic behaviors are experienced as cue-dependent, goal-independent, unconscious, and efficient. Habit formation requires context-dependent repetition to form cue-behavior associations. Results of diabetes habit studies are mixed. Observational studies have shown positive associations between habit strength and target self-management behaviors such as taking medication and monitoring blood glucose, as well as glycemic outcomes such as HbA1c. However, intervention studies conducted in similar populations have not demonstrated a significant benefit of habit-forming interventions compared to controls, possibly due to varying techniques used to promote habit formation. Automaticity of self-management behaviors has the potential to minimize the burden associated with performance of self-management tasks and ultimately improve outcomes for people with diabetes. Future studies should focus on refining interventions focused on context-dependent repetition to promote habit formation and better measurement of habit automaticity in diabetes self-management.

Abstract Image

习惯形成和自动性在糖尿病自我管理中的作用:目前的证据和未来的应用。
综述目的:糖尿病是一种慢性疾病,需要持续的自我管理才能获得最佳的健康结果。糖尿病患者容易出现倦怠、认知负担和自我管理任务的次优表现。专注于习惯形成的干预措施有可能通过促进自我管理任务执行的自动化来增加参与度。本综述的目的是:(1)在健康行为干预的背景下澄清习惯形成和行为自动性的概念,(2)回顾习惯与糖尿病自我管理相关行为的证据,(3)讨论将习惯形成和自动性纳入糖尿病自我管理干预的机会。最新发现:现代习惯研究将习惯描述为一种行为,这种行为是一种自动心理过程的结果。自动行为表现为线索依赖、目标独立、无意识和高效。习惯的形成需要上下文相关的重复来形成线索-行为联系。糖尿病习惯研究的结果喜忧参半。观察性研究表明,习惯强度与目标自我管理行为(如服药和监测血糖)以及糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)等血糖指标之间存在正相关。然而,在类似人群中进行的干预研究并没有显示出与对照组相比,习惯形成干预有显著的好处,这可能是由于促进习惯形成的技术不同。自我管理行为的自动性有可能将与自我管理任务表现相关的负担降到最低,并最终改善糖尿病患者的预后。未来的研究应侧重于改进干预措施,侧重于情境依赖性重复,以促进习惯的形成,并更好地测量糖尿病自我管理中的习惯自动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of this journal is to publish cutting-edge reviews on subjects pertinent to all aspects of diabetes epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. We aim to provide incisive, insightful, and balanced contributions from leading experts in each relevant domain that will be of immediate interest to a wide readership of clinicians, basic scientists, and translational investigators. We accomplish this aim by appointing major authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas across the discipline. Section Editors select topics to be reviewed by leading experts who emphasize recent developments and highlight important papers published over the past year on their topics, in a crisp and readable format. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field, and an Editorial Board of internationally diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信