Knowledge and Attitudes towards Dementia among the General Public in Singapore: A Comparative Analysis.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-20 DOI:10.1159/000530271
Gurpreet Kaur Hansra, Hazel Lim, Chin Yee Cheong, Philip Yap
{"title":"Knowledge and Attitudes towards Dementia among the General Public in Singapore: A Comparative Analysis.","authors":"Gurpreet Kaur Hansra,&nbsp;Hazel Lim,&nbsp;Chin Yee Cheong,&nbsp;Philip Yap","doi":"10.1159/000530271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This paper provides a summary of findings on the public's knowledge and attitudes towards dementia. We aim to investigate if the attitudes of Singaporeans towards dementia have changed over the years by adopting a questionnaire used in a similar study in 2012.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted through the dissemination of an existing, online questionnaire to participants above 16 years of age. Out of 1,500 subjects, results from 1,373 participants were analysed. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse and compare results from the 2012 study while a latent class analysis was performed to understand the categories of study participants based on varying levels of attitudes, knowledge and stigma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of study participants was 43.8 (SD = 15.7). Majority of the participants were females (76.5%), between 51 and 60 years of age (29.6%) and belonged to the Chinese ethnic group (77.8%). Results demonstrated that there were significant differences in attitudes towards dementia between 2012 and 2021. There was a 70.2% improvement in stigma-associated attitudes and an increase in correct responses to 4 out of 5 questions in the knowledge section.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings of this study suggest that the general public has a better knowledge and more positive attitude towards dementia. This could have been attributed to higher literacy levels of the current study population and effectiveness of established outreach initiatives in Singapore. However, further research with a more balanced representation of ethnic and cultural groups would offer more comprehensive insights into dementia health literacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: This paper provides a summary of findings on the public's knowledge and attitudes towards dementia. We aim to investigate if the attitudes of Singaporeans towards dementia have changed over the years by adopting a questionnaire used in a similar study in 2012.

Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted through the dissemination of an existing, online questionnaire to participants above 16 years of age. Out of 1,500 subjects, results from 1,373 participants were analysed. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse and compare results from the 2012 study while a latent class analysis was performed to understand the categories of study participants based on varying levels of attitudes, knowledge and stigma.

Results: The mean age of study participants was 43.8 (SD = 15.7). Majority of the participants were females (76.5%), between 51 and 60 years of age (29.6%) and belonged to the Chinese ethnic group (77.8%). Results demonstrated that there were significant differences in attitudes towards dementia between 2012 and 2021. There was a 70.2% improvement in stigma-associated attitudes and an increase in correct responses to 4 out of 5 questions in the knowledge section.

Conclusion: Findings of this study suggest that the general public has a better knowledge and more positive attitude towards dementia. This could have been attributed to higher literacy levels of the current study population and effectiveness of established outreach initiatives in Singapore. However, further research with a more balanced representation of ethnic and cultural groups would offer more comprehensive insights into dementia health literacy.

新加坡普通民众对痴呆症的认识和态度:比较分析。
引言:本文总结了公众对痴呆症的认识和态度。我们的目的是通过采用2012年一项类似研究中使用的问卷调查来调查新加坡人对痴呆症的态度多年来是否发生了变化。方法:通过向16岁以上的参与者分发现有的在线问卷,进行了一项横断面描述性研究。在1500名受试者中,对1373名参与者的结果进行了分析。描述性统计用于分析和比较2012年研究的结果,同时进行潜在类别分析,以了解基于不同态度、知识和污名水平的研究参与者类别。结果:研究参与者的平均年龄为43.8岁(SD=15.7)。大多数参与者是女性(76.5%),年龄在51岁至60岁之间(29.6%),属于中国民族(77.8%)。结果表明,2012年至2021年间,对痴呆症的态度存在显著差异。与污名相关的态度改善了70.2%,对知识部分5个问题中的4个问题的正确回答增加了。结论:本研究结果表明,公众对痴呆症有更好的认识和更积极的态度。这可能归因于当前研究人群的识字水平较高以及新加坡既定外联举措的有效性。然而,进一步研究种族和文化群体的代表性,将为痴呆症健康素养提供更全面的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: As a unique forum devoted exclusively to the study of cognitive dysfunction, ''Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders'' concentrates on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信