Academic Differences in BSN Admission Routes: Implications for Persistence.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Leslie A Jennings, Regina W Urban, Daisha J Cipher
{"title":"Academic Differences in BSN Admission Routes: Implications for Persistence.","authors":"Leslie A Jennings,&nbsp;Regina W Urban,&nbsp;Daisha J Cipher","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20230306-07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To increase retention of prelicensure nursing students, several routes are used for admission to nursing programs. Students can be accepted as an early matriculation (EM) student at the point of university admission or they can follow a traditional competitive approach (TR) for admission.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective matched cohort study design was used to explore the differences among selected academic variables in two groups of prelicensure undergraduate students (<i>n</i> = 136) in the same program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EM students had significantly lower science grade point averages (GPAs), pre-program GPAs, and junior-level GPAs than TR students. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in scores on the RN Fundamentals ATI examination, an important predictor of future NCLEX-RN success.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EM students were as successful as their counterparts on standardized examinations in the first semester of a nursing program. More research is needed to understand program outcomes associated with students entering nursing programs via different routes. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2023;62(5):302-306.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":54781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Education","volume":"62 5","pages":"302-306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20230306-07","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To increase retention of prelicensure nursing students, several routes are used for admission to nursing programs. Students can be accepted as an early matriculation (EM) student at the point of university admission or they can follow a traditional competitive approach (TR) for admission.

Method: A retrospective matched cohort study design was used to explore the differences among selected academic variables in two groups of prelicensure undergraduate students (n = 136) in the same program.

Results: EM students had significantly lower science grade point averages (GPAs), pre-program GPAs, and junior-level GPAs than TR students. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in scores on the RN Fundamentals ATI examination, an important predictor of future NCLEX-RN success.

Conclusion: EM students were as successful as their counterparts on standardized examinations in the first semester of a nursing program. More research is needed to understand program outcomes associated with students entering nursing programs via different routes. [J Nurs Educ. 2023;62(5):302-306.].

BSN入学途径的学术差异:对持久性的影响。
背景:为了增加获得执照前护理学生的保留率,有几种途径被用于护理课程的录取。学生可以在大学入学时被接受为早期入学(EM)学生,或者他们可以遵循传统的竞争方式(TR)入学。方法:采用回顾性匹配队列研究设计,对同一专业的两组136名本科预科生所选学术变量的差异进行分析。结果:与TR学生相比,EM学生的理科平均绩点(gpa)、课程前平均绩点(pre-program gpa)和初级平均绩点(junior-level gpa)显著降低。然而,两组在RN基础ATI考试分数上没有显著差异,这是未来NCLEX-RN成功的重要预测指标。结论:EM学生在护理课程第一学期的标准化考试中与同行一样成功。需要更多的研究来了解通过不同途径进入护理专业的学生的相关项目结果。[J].中国生物医学工程学报,2009;32(5):559 - 561。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Education is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles and new ideas for nurse educators in various types and levels of nursing programs for over 50 years. The Journal enhances the teaching-learning process, promotes curriculum development, and stimulates creative innovation and research in nursing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信