{"title":"A Survey on Shape-Constraint Deep Learning for Medical Image Segmentation","authors":"Simon Bohlender;Ilkay Oksuz;Anirban Mukhopadhyay","doi":"10.1109/RBME.2021.3136343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the advent of U-Net, fully convolutional deep neural networks and its many variants have completely changed the modern landscape of deep-learning based medical image segmentation. However, the over-dependence of these methods on pixel-level classification and regression has been identified early on as a problem. Especially when trained on medical databases with sparse available annotation, these methods are prone to generate segmentation artifacts such as fragmented structures, topological inconsistencies and islands of pixel. These artifacts are especially problematic in medical imaging since segmentation is almost always a pre-processing step for some downstream evaluations like surgical planning, visualization, prognosis, or treatment planning. However, one common thread across all these downstream tasks is the demand of anatomical consistency. To ensure the segmentation result is anatomically consistent, approaches based on Markov/ Conditional Random Fields, Statistical Shape Models, Active Contours are becoming increasingly popular over the past 5 years. In this review paper, a broad overview of recent literature on bringing explicit anatomical constraints for medical image segmentation is given, the shortcomings and opportunities are discussed and the potential shift towards implicit shape modelling is elaborated. We review the most relevant papers published until the submission date and provide a tabulated view with method details for quick access.","PeriodicalId":39235,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"16 ","pages":"225-240"},"PeriodicalIF":17.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9655482/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
Since the advent of U-Net, fully convolutional deep neural networks and its many variants have completely changed the modern landscape of deep-learning based medical image segmentation. However, the over-dependence of these methods on pixel-level classification and regression has been identified early on as a problem. Especially when trained on medical databases with sparse available annotation, these methods are prone to generate segmentation artifacts such as fragmented structures, topological inconsistencies and islands of pixel. These artifacts are especially problematic in medical imaging since segmentation is almost always a pre-processing step for some downstream evaluations like surgical planning, visualization, prognosis, or treatment planning. However, one common thread across all these downstream tasks is the demand of anatomical consistency. To ensure the segmentation result is anatomically consistent, approaches based on Markov/ Conditional Random Fields, Statistical Shape Models, Active Contours are becoming increasingly popular over the past 5 years. In this review paper, a broad overview of recent literature on bringing explicit anatomical constraints for medical image segmentation is given, the shortcomings and opportunities are discussed and the potential shift towards implicit shape modelling is elaborated. We review the most relevant papers published until the submission date and provide a tabulated view with method details for quick access.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering (RBME) serves as a platform to review the state-of-the-art and trends in the interdisciplinary field of biomedical engineering, which encompasses engineering, life sciences, and medicine. The journal aims to consolidate research and reviews for members of all IEEE societies interested in biomedical engineering. Recognizing the demand for comprehensive reviews among authors of various IEEE journals, RBME addresses this need by receiving, reviewing, and publishing scholarly works under one umbrella. It covers a broad spectrum, from historical to modern developments in biomedical engineering and the integration of technologies from various IEEE societies into the life sciences and medicine.