Tranexamic Acid Improves Survival in the Setting of Severe Head Injury in Combat Casualties.

Navneet K Baidwan, Steven G Schauer, Julia M Dixon, Smitha Bhaumik, Michael D April, Michael D April, Bradley A Dengler, Nee-Kofi Mould-Millman
{"title":"Tranexamic Acid Improves Survival in the Setting of Severe Head Injury in Combat Casualties.","authors":"Navneet K Baidwan,&nbsp;Steven G Schauer,&nbsp;Julia M Dixon,&nbsp;Smitha Bhaumik,&nbsp;Michael D April,&nbsp;Michael D April,&nbsp;Bradley A Dengler,&nbsp;Nee-Kofi Mould-Millman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Approximately 1.7 million people sustain traumatic brain injuries (TBI) annually in the US. To reduce morbidity and mortality, management strategies aim to control progressive intracranial bleeding. This study analyzes the association between Tranexamic Acid (TXA) administration and mortality among casualties within the Department of Defense Trauma Registry, specifically focusing on subsets of patients with varying degree of head injury severities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Besides descriptive statistics, we used inverse probability weighted (for age, military service category, mechanism of injury, total units of blood units administered), and injury severity (ISS) and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) head score adjusted generalized linear models to analyze the association between TXA and mortality. Specific subgroups of interest were increasing severities of head injury and further stratifying these by Glasgow Coma Score of 3-8 and severe overall bodily injuries (ISS>=15).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>25,866 patients were included in the analysis. 2,352 (9.1%) received TXA and 23,514 (90.9%) did not receive TXA. Among those with ISS>=15 (n=6,420), 21.2% received TXA. Among those with any head injury (AIS head injury severity score>=1; n=9,153), 7.2% received TXA. The median ISS scores were greater in the TXA versus no-TXA group (17 versus 6). Weighted and adjusted models showed overall, there was 25% lower mortality risk between those who received TXA at any point and those who did not (OR:0.75, 95% CI: 0.59, 0.95). Further, as the AIS severity score increased from >=1 (1.08; 0.80, 1.47) to >=5 (0.56; 0.33, 0.97), the odds of mortality decreased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TXA may potentially be beneficial in patients with severe head injuries, especially those with severe overall injury profiles. There is a need of definitive studies to confirm this association.</p>","PeriodicalId":74148,"journal":{"name":"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Approximately 1.7 million people sustain traumatic brain injuries (TBI) annually in the US. To reduce morbidity and mortality, management strategies aim to control progressive intracranial bleeding. This study analyzes the association between Tranexamic Acid (TXA) administration and mortality among casualties within the Department of Defense Trauma Registry, specifically focusing on subsets of patients with varying degree of head injury severities.

Methods: Besides descriptive statistics, we used inverse probability weighted (for age, military service category, mechanism of injury, total units of blood units administered), and injury severity (ISS) and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) head score adjusted generalized linear models to analyze the association between TXA and mortality. Specific subgroups of interest were increasing severities of head injury and further stratifying these by Glasgow Coma Score of 3-8 and severe overall bodily injuries (ISS>=15).

Results: 25,866 patients were included in the analysis. 2,352 (9.1%) received TXA and 23,514 (90.9%) did not receive TXA. Among those with ISS>=15 (n=6,420), 21.2% received TXA. Among those with any head injury (AIS head injury severity score>=1; n=9,153), 7.2% received TXA. The median ISS scores were greater in the TXA versus no-TXA group (17 versus 6). Weighted and adjusted models showed overall, there was 25% lower mortality risk between those who received TXA at any point and those who did not (OR:0.75, 95% CI: 0.59, 0.95). Further, as the AIS severity score increased from >=1 (1.08; 0.80, 1.47) to >=5 (0.56; 0.33, 0.97), the odds of mortality decreased.

Conclusions: TXA may potentially be beneficial in patients with severe head injuries, especially those with severe overall injury profiles. There is a need of definitive studies to confirm this association.

氨甲环酸提高战斗中严重头部损伤患者的存活率。
简介:在美国,每年大约有170万人遭受创伤性脑损伤(TBI)。为了降低发病率和死亡率,治疗策略旨在控制进行性颅内出血。本研究分析了氨甲环酸(TXA)给药与国防部创伤登记处伤亡人员死亡率之间的关系,特别关注不同程度头部损伤严重程度的患者亚群。方法:除描述性统计外,采用逆概率加权(年龄、兵役类别、损伤机制、总给血单位)、损伤严重程度(ISS)和简易损伤量表(AIS)头部评分调整广义线性模型分析TXA与死亡率的关系。特定亚组关注的是头部损伤严重程度的增加,并通过格拉斯哥昏迷评分3-8分和严重整体身体损伤(ISS>=15)进一步分层。结果:25866例患者纳入分析。2352例(9.1%)接受了TXA治疗,23514例(90.9%)未接受TXA治疗。在ISS>=15 (n=6,420)的患者中,21.2%的患者接受了TXA治疗。有颅脑损伤者(AIS颅脑损伤严重程度评分>=1;n= 9153), 7.2%接受TXA治疗。与无TXA组相比,TXA组的ISS中位数得分更高(17比6)。加权和调整模型显示,总体而言,在任何时候接受TXA治疗的患者和未接受TXA治疗的患者之间的死亡风险降低25% (OR:0.75, 95% CI: 0.59, 0.95)。进一步,随着AIS严重程度评分从>=1 (1.08;0.80, 1.47)到>=5 (0.56;0.33, 0.97),死亡率降低。结论:TXA可能对严重头部损伤的患者有潜在的益处,特别是那些有严重整体损伤的患者。需要明确的研究来证实这种关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信