Massive Transfusion Thresholds Associated with Combat Casualty Mortality during Operations in Afghanistan and Iraq: Implications for Role 1 Logistical Support Chains.

Michael D April, Andrew D Fisher, Rachel E Bridwell, Ronnie Hill, Brit Long, Joshua Oliver, James Bynum, Steven G Schauer
{"title":"Massive Transfusion Thresholds Associated with Combat Casualty Mortality during Operations in Afghanistan and Iraq: Implications for Role 1 Logistical Support Chains.","authors":"Michael D April,&nbsp;Andrew D Fisher,&nbsp;Rachel E Bridwell,&nbsp;Ronnie Hill,&nbsp;Brit Long,&nbsp;Joshua Oliver,&nbsp;James Bynum,&nbsp;Steven G Schauer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Limited literature exists examining outcomes associated with alternative thresholds for massive transfusion outside of the historical definition of 10 units of packed red blood cells (PRBC) in 24 hours. This study reports the predictive accuracy of alternative thresholds for 24-hour mortality and explores implications for Role 1 care supply requirements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) spanning encounters from 1 January 2007 through 17 March 2020. We included all casualties who received at least 1 unit of either PRBC or whole blood. We calculated area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) of blood product quantity received, including both PRBC and whole blood, as a predictor for mortality within 24 hours of arrival to a military treatment facility. We identified optimal predictive thresholds per Youden's index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 28,950 encounters of which 2,608 (9.0%) entailed receipt of at least 1 unit of PRBC or whole blood. Most casualties sustained battle injuries (2,437, 93.4%) with explosives as the most common mechanism (1,900, 72.8%) followed by firearms (609, 23.3%). The AUROC for blood product received within 24 hours was 0.59. The optimal threshold for predicting 24-hour mortality per Youden's Index was 20 units (sensitivity of 34.9% and specificity of 78.6%). The threshold exceeding 90% sensitivity was 2 units; whereas, the threshold exceeding 90% specificity was 33 units.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified a wide range of numbers of received blood products associated with short-term mortality based upon prioritization of sensitivity or specificity. This study found only 2 units of blood product received had a 90% sensitivity for predicting 24-hour mortality, highlighting the resource mobilization challenges that confront healthcare providers during resuscitation at the Role 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":74148,"journal":{"name":"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Limited literature exists examining outcomes associated with alternative thresholds for massive transfusion outside of the historical definition of 10 units of packed red blood cells (PRBC) in 24 hours. This study reports the predictive accuracy of alternative thresholds for 24-hour mortality and explores implications for Role 1 care supply requirements.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) spanning encounters from 1 January 2007 through 17 March 2020. We included all casualties who received at least 1 unit of either PRBC or whole blood. We calculated area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) of blood product quantity received, including both PRBC and whole blood, as a predictor for mortality within 24 hours of arrival to a military treatment facility. We identified optimal predictive thresholds per Youden's index.

Results: We identified 28,950 encounters of which 2,608 (9.0%) entailed receipt of at least 1 unit of PRBC or whole blood. Most casualties sustained battle injuries (2,437, 93.4%) with explosives as the most common mechanism (1,900, 72.8%) followed by firearms (609, 23.3%). The AUROC for blood product received within 24 hours was 0.59. The optimal threshold for predicting 24-hour mortality per Youden's Index was 20 units (sensitivity of 34.9% and specificity of 78.6%). The threshold exceeding 90% sensitivity was 2 units; whereas, the threshold exceeding 90% specificity was 33 units.

Conclusions: We identified a wide range of numbers of received blood products associated with short-term mortality based upon prioritization of sensitivity or specificity. This study found only 2 units of blood product received had a 90% sensitivity for predicting 24-hour mortality, highlighting the resource mobilization challenges that confront healthcare providers during resuscitation at the Role 1.

阿富汗和伊拉克行动中与战斗伤亡死亡率相关的大量输血阈值:对第1角色后勤支持链的影响。
简介:现有的文献有限,研究大量输血的替代阈值与24小时内10单位填充红细胞(PRBC)的历史定义之外的结果。本研究报告了24小时死亡率替代阈值的预测准确性,并探讨了角色1护理供应需求的影响。方法:我们对2007年1月1日至2020年3月17日期间国防部创伤登记处(DODTR)的数据进行了二次分析。我们纳入了所有接受过至少1单位PRBC或全血的伤员。我们计算了接受血液制品数量(包括PRBC和全血)的接受者操作曲线下面积(AUROC),作为到达军事治疗设施24小时内死亡率的预测因子。我们根据约登指数确定了最佳预测阈值。结果:我们确定了28,950例就诊,其中2,608例(9.0%)需要接受至少1单位的PRBC或全血。大多数伤亡是战斗伤害(2,437,93.4%),爆炸是最常见的机制(1,900,72.8%),其次是火器(609,23.3%)。24小时内接受血液制品的AUROC为0.59。按约登指数预测24小时死亡率的最佳阈值为20个单位(敏感性为34.9%,特异性为78.6%)。灵敏度超过90%的阈值为2个单位;而超过90%特异性的阈值为33个单位。结论:基于敏感性或特异性的优先顺序,我们确定了与短期死亡率相关的大量接受的血液制品。该研究发现,仅接受2个单位的血液制品对预测24小时死亡率有90%的敏感性,这突出了医疗保健提供者在第1角色复苏期间面临的资源动员挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信