Congenital diaphragmatic hernia survival in an English regional ECMO center.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Elizabeth O'Connor, Ryo Tamura, Therese Hannon, Sundeep Harigopal, Bruce Jaffray
{"title":"Congenital diaphragmatic hernia survival in an English regional ECMO center.","authors":"Elizabeth O'Connor,&nbsp;Ryo Tamura,&nbsp;Therese Hannon,&nbsp;Sundeep Harigopal,&nbsp;Bruce Jaffray","doi":"10.1136/wjps-2022-000506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) remains a cause of neonatal death. Our aims are to describe contemporary rates of survival and the variables associated with this outcome, contrasting these with our study of two decades earlier and recent reports.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of all infants diagnosed in a regional center between January 2000 and December 2020 was performed. The outcome of interest was survival. Possible explanatory variables included side of defect, use of complex ventilatory or hemodynamic strategies (inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and Prostin), presence of antenatal diagnosis, associated anomalies, birth weight, and gestation. Temporal changes were studied by measuring outcomes in each of four consecutive 63-month periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 225 cases were diagnosed. Survival was 60% (134 of 225). Postnatal survival was 68% (134 of 198 liveborn), and postrepair survival was 84% (134 of 159 who survived to repair). Diagnosis was made antenatally in 66% of cases. Variables associated with mortality were the need for complex ventilatory strategies (iNO, HFOV, Prostin, and ECMO), antenatal diagnosis, right-sided defects, use of patch repair, associated anomalies, birth weight, and gestation. Survival has improved from our report of a prior decade and did not vary during the study period. Postnatal survival has improved despite fewer terminations. On multivariate analysis, the need for complex ventilation was the strongest predictor of death (OR=50, 95% CI 13 to 224, p<0.0001), and associated anomalies ceased to be predictive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Survival has improved from our earlier report, despite reduced numbers of terminations. This may be related to increased use of complex ventilatory strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23823,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ed/1b/wjps-2022-000506.PMC10152044.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Pediatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/wjps-2022-000506","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) remains a cause of neonatal death. Our aims are to describe contemporary rates of survival and the variables associated with this outcome, contrasting these with our study of two decades earlier and recent reports.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review of all infants diagnosed in a regional center between January 2000 and December 2020 was performed. The outcome of interest was survival. Possible explanatory variables included side of defect, use of complex ventilatory or hemodynamic strategies (inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and Prostin), presence of antenatal diagnosis, associated anomalies, birth weight, and gestation. Temporal changes were studied by measuring outcomes in each of four consecutive 63-month periods.

Results: A total of 225 cases were diagnosed. Survival was 60% (134 of 225). Postnatal survival was 68% (134 of 198 liveborn), and postrepair survival was 84% (134 of 159 who survived to repair). Diagnosis was made antenatally in 66% of cases. Variables associated with mortality were the need for complex ventilatory strategies (iNO, HFOV, Prostin, and ECMO), antenatal diagnosis, right-sided defects, use of patch repair, associated anomalies, birth weight, and gestation. Survival has improved from our report of a prior decade and did not vary during the study period. Postnatal survival has improved despite fewer terminations. On multivariate analysis, the need for complex ventilation was the strongest predictor of death (OR=50, 95% CI 13 to 224, p<0.0001), and associated anomalies ceased to be predictive.

Conclusions: Survival has improved from our earlier report, despite reduced numbers of terminations. This may be related to increased use of complex ventilatory strategies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

先天性膈疝在英国区域ECMO中心的存活率。
简介:先天性膈疝(CDH)仍然是新生儿死亡的一个原因。我们的目的是描述当代生存率和与此结果相关的变量,并将其与我们20年前和最近的研究报告进行对比。材料和方法:对2000年1月至2020年12月在区域中心诊断的所有婴儿进行回顾性研究。感兴趣的结果是生存。可能的解释变量包括缺陷的侧方,使用复杂的通气或血流动力学策略(吸入一氧化氮(iNO),高频振荡通气(HFOV),体外膜氧合(ECMO)和前列腺素),产前诊断的存在,相关异常,出生体重和妊娠。通过测量连续四个63个月期间的结果来研究时间变化。结果:共确诊225例。生存率为60%(134 / 225)。产后生存率为68%(198例活产儿中134例),术后生存率为84%(159例活产儿中134例进行修复)。66%的病例通过产前诊断。与死亡率相关的变量是需要复杂的通气策略(iNO、HFOV、Prostin和ECMO)、产前诊断、右侧缺陷、补片修复的使用、相关异常、出生体重和妊娠。生存率比我们前十年的报告有所提高,并且在研究期间没有变化。尽管堕胎减少,但产后存活率有所提高。在多变量分析中,需要复杂通气是死亡的最强预测因子(OR=50, 95% CI 13至224)。结论:尽管终止数量减少,但生存率比我们之前的报告有所提高。这可能与增加使用复杂通气策略有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
38
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信