Impact of changing PI-RADS cutoff on prostate cancer detection by MRI cognitive fusion biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients.

IF 2.1 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Hesham Abdel-Azim El-Helaly, Asem Abdel-Aziz Mahmoud, Ahmed Mohamed Magdy, Abdelwahab Hasehem, Hamdy Mohamed Ibrahim, Khaled Moheyelden Mohamed, Mohamed Hamdy Ismail
{"title":"Impact of changing PI-RADS cutoff on prostate cancer detection by MRI cognitive fusion biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients.","authors":"Hesham Abdel-Azim El-Helaly,&nbsp;Asem Abdel-Aziz Mahmoud,&nbsp;Ahmed Mohamed Magdy,&nbsp;Abdelwahab Hasehem,&nbsp;Hamdy Mohamed Ibrahim,&nbsp;Khaled Moheyelden Mohamed,&nbsp;Mohamed Hamdy Ismail","doi":"10.1186/s43046-023-00165-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging may improve the detection of prostate cancer. The aim of this work is to compare between PI-RADS 3-5 and PI-RADS 4-5 as a threshold for targeted prostatic biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective clinical study that included 40 biopsy-naïve patients referred for prostate biopsy. Patients underwent prebiopsy multi-parametric (mp-MRI), followed by 12-core transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy and cognitive MRI/TRUS fusion targeted biopsy from each detected lesion. The primary endpoint was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the PI-RAD 3-4 versus PI-RADS 4-5 lesion by mpMRI for prostate cancer detection in biopsy-naive men.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prostate cancer detection rate and the clinically significant cancer detection rate were 42.5% and 35%, respectively. Targeted biopsies from PI-RADS 3-5 lesions showed a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 44%, positive predictive value of 51.7%, and negative predictive value of 100%. Restricting targeted biopsies to PI-RADS 4-5 lesions resulted in a decrease in sensitivity and negative predictive value to 73.3% and 86.2%, respectively, while specificity and positive predictive value were increased to 100% for both parameters which was statistically significant (P value < 0.0001 and P value = 0.004, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Limiting the TBs to PI-RADS 4-5 lesions improves the performance of mp-MRI in the detection of prostate cancer especially aggressive tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":17301,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute","volume":"35 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43046-023-00165-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging may improve the detection of prostate cancer. The aim of this work is to compare between PI-RADS 3-5 and PI-RADS 4-5 as a threshold for targeted prostatic biopsy.

Methods: This is a prospective clinical study that included 40 biopsy-naïve patients referred for prostate biopsy. Patients underwent prebiopsy multi-parametric (mp-MRI), followed by 12-core transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy and cognitive MRI/TRUS fusion targeted biopsy from each detected lesion. The primary endpoint was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the PI-RAD 3-4 versus PI-RADS 4-5 lesion by mpMRI for prostate cancer detection in biopsy-naive men.

Results: The overall prostate cancer detection rate and the clinically significant cancer detection rate were 42.5% and 35%, respectively. Targeted biopsies from PI-RADS 3-5 lesions showed a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 44%, positive predictive value of 51.7%, and negative predictive value of 100%. Restricting targeted biopsies to PI-RADS 4-5 lesions resulted in a decrease in sensitivity and negative predictive value to 73.3% and 86.2%, respectively, while specificity and positive predictive value were increased to 100% for both parameters which was statistically significant (P value < 0.0001 and P value = 0.004, respectively).

Conclusions: Limiting the TBs to PI-RADS 4-5 lesions improves the performance of mp-MRI in the detection of prostate cancer especially aggressive tumors.

改变PI-RADS切断对biopsy-naïve患者MRI认知融合活检检测前列腺癌的影响。
背景:多参数磁共振成像可以提高前列腺癌的检出率。这项工作的目的是比较PI-RADS 3-5和PI-RADS 4-5作为靶向前列腺活检的阈值。方法:这是一项前瞻性临床研究,包括40例biopsy-naïve患者转介前列腺活检。患者进行活检前多参数(mp-MRI)检查,随后对每个检测到的病变进行12核经直肠超声引导的系统活检和认知MRI/TRUS融合靶向活检。主要终点是评估PI-RADS 3-4与PI-RADS 4-5病变在未接受活检的男性前列腺癌检测中的mpMRI诊断准确性。结果:总体前列腺癌检出率为42.5%,临床显著癌检出率为35%。PI-RADS 3-5病灶的靶向活检敏感性为100%,特异性为44%,阳性预测值为51.7%,阴性预测值为100%。将靶向活检限制在PI-RADS 4-5病灶范围内,敏感性和阴性预测值分别降低至73.3%和86.2%,特异性和阳性预测值均提高至100%,差异有统计学意义(P值)。结论:将靶活检限制在PI-RADS 4-5病灶范围内,可提高mp-MRI对前列腺癌尤其是侵袭性肿瘤的检测效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, the Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute (JENCI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal that publishes on the latest innovations in oncology and thereby, providing academics and clinicians a leading research platform. JENCI welcomes submissions pertaining to all fields of basic, applied and clinical cancer research. Main topics of interest include: local and systemic anticancer therapy (with specific interest on applied cancer research from developing countries); experimental oncology; early cancer detection; randomized trials (including negatives ones); and key emerging fields of personalized medicine, such as molecular pathology, bioinformatics, and biotechnologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信