The ideal timing for revision surgery following an infected cranioplasty.

Q4 Medicine
Hout Van G, Vissers G, Thiessen F, Tondu T
{"title":"The ideal timing for revision surgery following an infected cranioplasty.","authors":"Hout Van G,&nbsp;Vissers G,&nbsp;Thiessen F,&nbsp;Tondu T","doi":"10.48095/ccachp2022135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is a challenge to define the ideal timing for revision surgery following an infected cranioplasty. Both healing of infected bone and preparedness of soft tissue must be considered. There is no gold standard regarding the timing of revision surgery and a lot of studies have contradictory findings. Many studies recommend waiting for 6-12 months to reduce reinfection risks. This case report highlights that delay in revision surgery for an infected cranioplasty is a useful and rewarding modality. It allows a longer observational timeframe to monitor for infectious episodes. Furthermore, vascular delay enhances tissue neovascularization and may therefore lead to less invasive reconstructive techniques with minimized donor site morbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":7098,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae plasticae","volume":"64 3-4","pages":"135-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae plasticae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccachp2022135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is a challenge to define the ideal timing for revision surgery following an infected cranioplasty. Both healing of infected bone and preparedness of soft tissue must be considered. There is no gold standard regarding the timing of revision surgery and a lot of studies have contradictory findings. Many studies recommend waiting for 6-12 months to reduce reinfection risks. This case report highlights that delay in revision surgery for an infected cranioplasty is a useful and rewarding modality. It allows a longer observational timeframe to monitor for infectious episodes. Furthermore, vascular delay enhances tissue neovascularization and may therefore lead to less invasive reconstructive techniques with minimized donor site morbidities.

感染颅骨成形术后翻修手术的理想时机。
确定感染颅骨成形术后翻修手术的理想时机是一个挑战。感染骨的愈合和软组织的准备都必须考虑。关于翻修手术的时机没有黄金标准,许多研究有相互矛盾的发现。许多研究建议等待6-12个月以降低再感染风险。本病例报告强调,延迟翻修手术的感染颅骨成形术是一个有用的和有益的模式。它允许更长的观察时间框架来监测感染事件。此外,血管延迟增强了组织新生血管,因此可能导致侵入性更小的重建技术,并将供体部位的发病率降到最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta chirurgiae plasticae
Acta chirurgiae plasticae Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信