Efficacy and Safety of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies: An Updated Review.

Q3 Medicine
Gandham Ravi, Madhavi Eerike, Venugopala Rao Konda, Debasis Bisoi, Gerard Marshall Raj, Rekha Priyadarshini, Kalpana Ramanna Mali, Leo Francis Chaliserry
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies: An Updated Review.","authors":"Gandham Ravi,&nbsp;Madhavi Eerike,&nbsp;Venugopala Rao Konda,&nbsp;Debasis Bisoi,&nbsp;Gerard Marshall Raj,&nbsp;Rekha Priyadarshini,&nbsp;Kalpana Ramanna Mali,&nbsp;Leo Francis Chaliserry","doi":"10.1089/mab.2022.0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) had received emergency use authorization for mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) or for prophylaxis against COVID-19, including casirivimab plus imdevimab (C+I), bamlanivimab plus etesevimab (B+E), tixagevimab plus cilgavimab (T+CG), and sotrovimab (S) and bebtelovimab (BEB). This systematic review was done to assess the efficacy and safety of the same. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and FDA fact sheets were searched for the studies published between January 2021 and May 2022, and appropriate search terms related to the mentioned mAbs were used for data collection. Review included original research including randomized clinical trials and observational studies published or preprints. Studies included in the review had compared with placebo or standard of care or no treatment or mAbs with each other and also of various doses. Data extraction was done and reviewed the same for both efficacy and safety. Total of 20 studies were included in this review. The rate of hospitalization within 30 days showed ∼2% in comparison to ∼7% with placebo. Significant reduction in viral load was more observed with combination mAbs. Combination therapy showed faster virological cure against the Gamma variant. With C + I as postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), 29.0% of asymptomatic participants developed symptomatic COVID-19. Pre-exposure prophylaxis with T+CG reduced the incidence of infection by 77%. Infusion-related reaction was the most common adverse event (AE). The neutralizing mAbs reduced hospitalization in mild-to-moderate patients with infusion-related reactions as common AE. The response was better in the seronegative patients. Most of these studies were conducted in unvaccinated individuals and against Alpha, Gamma, and Delta variants.</p>","PeriodicalId":53514,"journal":{"name":"Monoclonal Antibodies in Immunodiagnosis and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monoclonal Antibodies in Immunodiagnosis and Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/mab.2022.0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) had received emergency use authorization for mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) or for prophylaxis against COVID-19, including casirivimab plus imdevimab (C+I), bamlanivimab plus etesevimab (B+E), tixagevimab plus cilgavimab (T+CG), and sotrovimab (S) and bebtelovimab (BEB). This systematic review was done to assess the efficacy and safety of the same. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and FDA fact sheets were searched for the studies published between January 2021 and May 2022, and appropriate search terms related to the mentioned mAbs were used for data collection. Review included original research including randomized clinical trials and observational studies published or preprints. Studies included in the review had compared with placebo or standard of care or no treatment or mAbs with each other and also of various doses. Data extraction was done and reviewed the same for both efficacy and safety. Total of 20 studies were included in this review. The rate of hospitalization within 30 days showed ∼2% in comparison to ∼7% with placebo. Significant reduction in viral load was more observed with combination mAbs. Combination therapy showed faster virological cure against the Gamma variant. With C + I as postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), 29.0% of asymptomatic participants developed symptomatic COVID-19. Pre-exposure prophylaxis with T+CG reduced the incidence of infection by 77%. Infusion-related reaction was the most common adverse event (AE). The neutralizing mAbs reduced hospitalization in mild-to-moderate patients with infusion-related reactions as common AE. The response was better in the seronegative patients. Most of these studies were conducted in unvaccinated individuals and against Alpha, Gamma, and Delta variants.

抗sars - cov -2单克隆抗体的有效性和安全性:最新综述
单克隆抗体(mab)已获得用于轻中度冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)或预防COVID-19的紧急使用授权,包括卡西瑞维单抗+伊德维单抗(C+I)、巴兰尼维单抗+依替西维单抗(B+E)、替沙吉维单抗+西加维单抗(T+CG)、索罗维单抗(S)和贝特洛维单抗(BEB)。本系统评价是为了评估该药物的有效性和安全性。检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus、medRxiv、bioRxiv和FDA资料表,检索2021年1月至2022年5月间发表的研究,并使用与上述单克隆抗体相关的适当搜索词进行数据收集。综述包括原始研究,包括随机临床试验和已发表或预印本的观察性研究。该综述中包括的研究比较了安慰剂、标准护理、无治疗或单克隆抗体相互之间以及不同剂量的比较。完成了数据提取,并对有效性和安全性进行了相同的审查。本综述共纳入20项研究。30天内住院率为~ 2%,而安慰剂组为~ 7%。联合单抗更能显著降低病毒载量。联合治疗显示出对γ变异更快的病毒学治愈。以C + I为暴露后预防(PEP), 29.0%的无症状参与者出现症状性COVID-19。暴露前预防T+CG可使感染发生率降低77%。输液相关反应是最常见的不良事件(AE)。中和单抗可减少因输液相关反应(常见AE)而住院的轻中度患者。血清阴性患者的疗效更好。这些研究大多是在未接种疫苗的个体中进行的,针对的是α、γ和Delta变体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信