Reducing misclassification of mild cognitive impairment based on base rate information from the Uniform data set.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Tomas Nikolai, Filip Děchtěrenko, Beril Yaffe, Hana Georgi, Miloslav Kopecek, Markéta Červenková, Martin Vyhnálek, Ondrej Bezdicek
{"title":"Reducing misclassification of mild cognitive impairment based on base rate information from the Uniform data set.","authors":"Tomas Nikolai,&nbsp;Filip Děchtěrenko,&nbsp;Beril Yaffe,&nbsp;Hana Georgi,&nbsp;Miloslav Kopecek,&nbsp;Markéta Červenková,&nbsp;Martin Vyhnálek,&nbsp;Ondrej Bezdicek","doi":"10.1080/13825585.2021.2022593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study aimed to define and validate the criteria for characterizing <i>possible</i> and <i>probable</i> cognitive deficits based on the psychometric approach using the Uniform data set Czech version (UDS-CZ 2.0) to reduce the rate of misdiagnosis. We computed the prevalence of low scores on the 14 subtests of UDS-CZ 2.0 in a normative sample of healthy older adults and validated criteria for possible and probable cognitive impairment on the sample of amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) patients. The misclassification rate of the validation sample using psychometrically derived criteria remained low: for classification as possible impairment, we found 66-76% correct classification in the clinical sample and only 2-8% false positives in the healthy control validation sample, similar results were obtained for probable cognitive impairment. Our findings offer a psychometric approach and a computational tool to minimize the misdiagnosis of mild cognitive impairment compared to traditional criteria for MCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":7532,"journal":{"name":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","volume":"30 3","pages":"301-320"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2021.2022593","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The current study aimed to define and validate the criteria for characterizing possible and probable cognitive deficits based on the psychometric approach using the Uniform data set Czech version (UDS-CZ 2.0) to reduce the rate of misdiagnosis. We computed the prevalence of low scores on the 14 subtests of UDS-CZ 2.0 in a normative sample of healthy older adults and validated criteria for possible and probable cognitive impairment on the sample of amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) patients. The misclassification rate of the validation sample using psychometrically derived criteria remained low: for classification as possible impairment, we found 66-76% correct classification in the clinical sample and only 2-8% false positives in the healthy control validation sample, similar results were obtained for probable cognitive impairment. Our findings offer a psychometric approach and a computational tool to minimize the misdiagnosis of mild cognitive impairment compared to traditional criteria for MCI.

基于统一数据集的基本率信息减少轻度认知障碍的错误分类。
本研究旨在使用统一数据集捷克版(UDS-CZ 2.0)定义和验证基于心理测量方法表征可能和可能的认知缺陷的标准,以减少误诊率。我们计算了健康老年人标准样本中14个sds - cz2.0亚测试低分的患病率,并验证了健忘轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者样本中可能和可能的认知障碍标准。使用心理测量学衍生标准的验证样本的错误分类率仍然很低:对于可能的障碍分类,我们发现临床样本中有66-76%的正确分类,而在健康对照验证样本中只有2-8%的假阳性,对于可能的认知障碍也获得了类似的结果。我们的研究结果提供了一种心理测量方法和计算工具,与传统的轻度认知障碍标准相比,可以最大限度地减少轻度认知障碍的误诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The purposes of Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition are to (a) publish research on both the normal and dysfunctional aspects of cognitive development in adulthood and aging, and (b) promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings between the fields of cognitive gerontology and neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of the journal is to publish original empirical research. Occasionally, theoretical or methodological papers, critical reviews of a content area, or theoretically relevant case studies will also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信