Diagnosis of fracture-related infection in patients without clinical confirmatory criteria: an international retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Niels Vanvelk, Esther M M Van Lieshout, Jolien Onsea, Jonathan Sliepen, Geertje Govaert, Frank F A IJpma, Melissa Depypere, Jamie Ferguson, Martin McNally, William T Obremskey, Charalampos Zalavras, Michael H J Verhofstad, Willem-Jan Metsemakers
{"title":"Diagnosis of fracture-related infection in patients without clinical confirmatory criteria: an international retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Niels Vanvelk,&nbsp;Esther M M Van Lieshout,&nbsp;Jolien Onsea,&nbsp;Jonathan Sliepen,&nbsp;Geertje Govaert,&nbsp;Frank F A IJpma,&nbsp;Melissa Depypere,&nbsp;Jamie Ferguson,&nbsp;Martin McNally,&nbsp;William T Obremskey,&nbsp;Charalampos Zalavras,&nbsp;Michael H J Verhofstad,&nbsp;Willem-Jan Metsemakers","doi":"10.5194/jbji-8-133-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: fracture-related infection (FRI) remains a serious complication in orthopedic trauma. To standardize daily clinical practice, a consensus definition was established, based on confirmatory and suggestive criteria. In the presence of clinical confirmatory criteria, the diagnosis of an FRI is evident, and treatment can be started. However, if these criteria are absent, the decision to surgically collect deep tissue cultures can only be based on suggestive criteria. The primary study aim was to characterize the subpopulation of FRI patients presenting without clinical confirmatory criteria (fistula, sinus, wound breakdown, purulent wound drainage or presence of pus during surgery). The secondary aims were to describe the prevalence of the diagnostic criteria for FRI and present the microbiological characteristics, both for the entire FRI population. <b>Methods</b>: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study was performed, reporting the demographic, clinical and microbiological characteristics of 609 patients (with 613 fractures) who were treated for FRI based on the recommendations of a multidisciplinary team. Patients were divided in three groups, including the total population and two subgroups of patients presenting with or without clinical confirmatory criteria. <b>Results</b>: clinical and microbiological confirmatory criteria were present in 77 % and 87 % of the included fractures, respectively. Of patients, 23 % presented without clinical confirmatory criteria, and they mostly displayed one (31 %) or two (23 %) suggestive clinical criteria (redness, swelling, warmth, pain, fever, new-onset joint effusion, persisting/increasing/new-onset wound drainage). The prevalence of any suggestive clinical, radiological or laboratory criteria in this subgroup was 85 %, 55 % and 97 %, respectively. Most infections were monomicrobial (64 %) and caused by <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>. <b>Conclusion</b>: clinical confirmatory criteria were absent in 23 % of the FRIs. In these cases, the decision to operatively collect deep tissue cultures was based on clinical, radiological and laboratory suggestive criteria. The combined use of these criteria should guide physicians in the management pathway of FRI. Further research is needed to provide guidelines on the decision to proceed with surgery when only these suggestive criteria are present.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"8 2","pages":"133-142"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134751/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-133-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: fracture-related infection (FRI) remains a serious complication in orthopedic trauma. To standardize daily clinical practice, a consensus definition was established, based on confirmatory and suggestive criteria. In the presence of clinical confirmatory criteria, the diagnosis of an FRI is evident, and treatment can be started. However, if these criteria are absent, the decision to surgically collect deep tissue cultures can only be based on suggestive criteria. The primary study aim was to characterize the subpopulation of FRI patients presenting without clinical confirmatory criteria (fistula, sinus, wound breakdown, purulent wound drainage or presence of pus during surgery). The secondary aims were to describe the prevalence of the diagnostic criteria for FRI and present the microbiological characteristics, both for the entire FRI population. Methods: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study was performed, reporting the demographic, clinical and microbiological characteristics of 609 patients (with 613 fractures) who were treated for FRI based on the recommendations of a multidisciplinary team. Patients were divided in three groups, including the total population and two subgroups of patients presenting with or without clinical confirmatory criteria. Results: clinical and microbiological confirmatory criteria were present in 77 % and 87 % of the included fractures, respectively. Of patients, 23 % presented without clinical confirmatory criteria, and they mostly displayed one (31 %) or two (23 %) suggestive clinical criteria (redness, swelling, warmth, pain, fever, new-onset joint effusion, persisting/increasing/new-onset wound drainage). The prevalence of any suggestive clinical, radiological or laboratory criteria in this subgroup was 85 %, 55 % and 97 %, respectively. Most infections were monomicrobial (64 %) and caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Conclusion: clinical confirmatory criteria were absent in 23 % of the FRIs. In these cases, the decision to operatively collect deep tissue cultures was based on clinical, radiological and laboratory suggestive criteria. The combined use of these criteria should guide physicians in the management pathway of FRI. Further research is needed to provide guidelines on the decision to proceed with surgery when only these suggestive criteria are present.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在没有临床确诊标准的患者中诊断骨折相关感染:一项国际回顾性队列研究。
背景:骨折相关感染(FRI)仍然是骨科创伤的一个严重并发症。为了规范日常临床实践,建立了一个共识定义,基于验证性和暗示性标准。在有临床确诊标准的情况下,FRI的诊断是明显的,可以开始治疗。然而,如果这些标准不存在,手术收集深层组织培养的决定只能基于暗示的标准。研究的主要目的是描述没有临床确诊标准(瘘、窦、伤口破裂、脓性伤口引流或手术中有脓)的FRI患者亚群。次要目的是描述FRI诊断标准的流行程度,并介绍整个FRI人群的微生物学特征。方法:采用多中心、回顾性队列研究,报告609例患者(613例骨折)的人口学、临床和微生物学特征,这些患者根据多学科团队的建议接受了FRI治疗。患者被分为三组,包括总人口和有或没有临床验证标准的患者的两个亚组。结果:77% %和87% %的骨折符合临床和微生物鉴定标准。23 %的患者没有临床确认标准,他们大多表现出一个(31 %)或两个(23 %)提示临床标准(红肿、发热、疼痛、发热、新发关节积液、持续/增加/新发伤口引流)。在该亚组中,任何暗示性临床、放射学或实验室标准的患病率分别为85 %、55 %和97 %。大多数感染为单菌感染(64% %),由金黄色葡萄球菌引起。结论:23 %的fri患者缺乏临床确诊标准。在这些病例中,手术采集深层组织培养的决定是基于临床、放射学和实验室的提示标准。这些标准的综合应用应指导医生对FRI的处理途径。需要进一步的研究来提供在仅存在这些提示标准时进行手术的决策指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信