Student-driven disability advocacy and education within the health professions: pilot survey results from a single-day virtual conference.

Q2 Social Sciences
Elizabeth J Adams, Samantha Schroth, Trisha Kaundinya
{"title":"Student-driven disability advocacy and education within the health professions: pilot survey results from a single-day virtual conference.","authors":"Elizabeth J Adams,&nbsp;Samantha Schroth,&nbsp;Trisha Kaundinya","doi":"10.1080/17538068.2023.2208836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health professional programs can promote equitable healthcare delivery but few programs include disability in these efforts. Limited opportunities exist for health professional students to engage with disability education within the classroom or beyond. The Disability Advocacy Coalition in Medicine (DAC Med) is a national interprofessional student-led organization which hosted a virtual conference for health professional students in October 2021. We describe the impact of this single-day virtual conference on learning and the current state of disability education across health professional programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study utilized a 17-item post-conference survey. A 5-point Likert scale-based survey was distributed to conference registrants. Survey parameters included background in disability advocacy, curricular exposure to disability, and impact of the conference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four conference attendees completed the survey. Participants were enrolled in audiology, genetic counseling, medical, medical scientist, nursing, prosthetics and orthotics, public health, and 'other' health programs. Most participants (58.3%) reported not having a strong background in disability advocacy before the conference, with 26.1% indicating they learned about ableism in their program's curriculum. Almost all students (91.6%) attended the conference to learn how to be a better advocate for patients and peers with disabilities, and 95.8% reported that the conference provided this knowledge. Eighty-eight percent of participants agreed that they acquired additional resources to better care for patients with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Few health professional students learn about disability in their curriculum. Single-day virtual, interactive conferences are effective in providing advocacy resources and empowering students to employ them.</p>","PeriodicalId":38052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"255-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2023.2208836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health professional programs can promote equitable healthcare delivery but few programs include disability in these efforts. Limited opportunities exist for health professional students to engage with disability education within the classroom or beyond. The Disability Advocacy Coalition in Medicine (DAC Med) is a national interprofessional student-led organization which hosted a virtual conference for health professional students in October 2021. We describe the impact of this single-day virtual conference on learning and the current state of disability education across health professional programs.

Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized a 17-item post-conference survey. A 5-point Likert scale-based survey was distributed to conference registrants. Survey parameters included background in disability advocacy, curricular exposure to disability, and impact of the conference.

Results: Twenty-four conference attendees completed the survey. Participants were enrolled in audiology, genetic counseling, medical, medical scientist, nursing, prosthetics and orthotics, public health, and 'other' health programs. Most participants (58.3%) reported not having a strong background in disability advocacy before the conference, with 26.1% indicating they learned about ableism in their program's curriculum. Almost all students (91.6%) attended the conference to learn how to be a better advocate for patients and peers with disabilities, and 95.8% reported that the conference provided this knowledge. Eighty-eight percent of participants agreed that they acquired additional resources to better care for patients with disabilities.

Conclusions: Few health professional students learn about disability in their curriculum. Single-day virtual, interactive conferences are effective in providing advocacy resources and empowering students to employ them.

卫生专业中学生主导的残疾宣传和教育:一天虚拟会议的试点调查结果。
背景:卫生专业项目可以促进公平的医疗服务,但很少有项目将残疾纳入这些努力。卫生专业学生在课堂内外参与残疾教育的机会有限。医学残疾倡导联盟(DAC Med)是一个由学生领导的全国性跨专业组织,于2021年10月为健康专业学生举办了一次虚拟会议。我们描述了这场为期一天的虚拟会议对学习的影响,以及卫生专业项目中残疾教育的现状。方法:这项横断面研究采用了一项17项的会后调查。向会议注册者分发了一份基于Likert量表的5分调查。调查参数包括残疾宣传的背景、课程中对残疾的接触以及会议的影响。结果:24名与会者完成了调查。参与者参加了听力学、基因咨询、医学、医学科学家、护理、假肢和矫形器、公共卫生和“其他”健康项目。大多数参与者(58.3%)表示,在会议之前,他们在残疾宣传方面没有很强的背景,26.1%的参与者表示,他们在项目课程中了解到了残疾主义。几乎所有学生(91.6%)都参加了会议,学习如何更好地为残疾患者和同龄人辩护,95.8%的学生表示会议提供了这些知识。88%的参与者同意他们获得了额外的资源来更好地照顾残疾患者。结论:很少有健康专业的学生在课程中学习残疾。一天的虚拟互动会议有效地提供了宣传资源,并使学生能够使用这些资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Communication in Healthcare
Journal of Communication in Healthcare Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信