Development of circulating microRNA-based biomarkers for medical decision-making: a friendly reminder of what should NOT be done.

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Päivi Lakkisto, Louise Torp Dalgaard, Thalia Belmonte, Sara-Joan Pinto-Sietsma, Yvan Devaux, David de Gonzalo-Calvo
{"title":"Development of circulating microRNA-based biomarkers for medical decision-making: a friendly reminder of what should NOT be done.","authors":"Päivi Lakkisto,&nbsp;Louise Torp Dalgaard,&nbsp;Thalia Belmonte,&nbsp;Sara-Joan Pinto-Sietsma,&nbsp;Yvan Devaux,&nbsp;David de Gonzalo-Calvo","doi":"10.1080/10408363.2022.2128030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Circulating cell-free microRNAs (miRNAs) represent a major reservoir for biomarker discovery. Unfortunately, their implementation in clinical practice is limited due to a profound lack of reproducibility. The great technical variability linked to major pre-analytical and analytical caveats makes the interpretation of circulating cell-free miRNA data challenging and leads to inconsistent findings. Additional efforts directed to standardization are fundamental. Several well-established protocols are currently used by independent groups worldwide. Nonetheless, there are some specific aspects in specimen collection and processing, sample handling, miRNA quantification, and data analysis that should be considered to ensure reproducibility of results. Here, we have addressed this challenge using an alternative approach. We have highlighted and discussed common pitfalls that negatively impact the robustness of circulating miRNA quantification and their application for clinical decision-making. Furthermore, we provide a checklist usable by investigators to facilitate and ensure the control of the whole miRNA quantification and analytical process. We expect that these recommendations improve the reproducibility of findings, and ultimately, facilitate the incorporation of circulating miRNA profiles into clinical practice as the next generation of disease biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":10760,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","volume":"60 2","pages":"141-152"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2022.2128030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Circulating cell-free microRNAs (miRNAs) represent a major reservoir for biomarker discovery. Unfortunately, their implementation in clinical practice is limited due to a profound lack of reproducibility. The great technical variability linked to major pre-analytical and analytical caveats makes the interpretation of circulating cell-free miRNA data challenging and leads to inconsistent findings. Additional efforts directed to standardization are fundamental. Several well-established protocols are currently used by independent groups worldwide. Nonetheless, there are some specific aspects in specimen collection and processing, sample handling, miRNA quantification, and data analysis that should be considered to ensure reproducibility of results. Here, we have addressed this challenge using an alternative approach. We have highlighted and discussed common pitfalls that negatively impact the robustness of circulating miRNA quantification and their application for clinical decision-making. Furthermore, we provide a checklist usable by investigators to facilitate and ensure the control of the whole miRNA quantification and analytical process. We expect that these recommendations improve the reproducibility of findings, and ultimately, facilitate the incorporation of circulating miRNA profiles into clinical practice as the next generation of disease biomarkers.

基于微rna的循环生物标志物在医疗决策中的发展:一个不应该做的友好提醒。
循环无细胞microRNAs (miRNAs)是发现生物标志物的主要储存库。不幸的是,由于严重缺乏可重复性,它们在临床实践中的实施受到限制。与主要的分析前和分析警告相关的巨大技术变异性使得对循环无细胞miRNA数据的解释具有挑战性,并导致不一致的发现。针对标准化的额外努力是至关重要的。目前,世界各地的独立团体正在使用几个完善的协议。尽管如此,在标本采集和处理、样品处理、miRNA定量和数据分析中,仍有一些具体的方面需要考虑,以确保结果的可重复性。在这里,我们使用另一种方法解决了这一挑战。我们强调并讨论了对循环miRNA量化的稳健性及其在临床决策中的应用产生负面影响的常见陷阱。此外,我们还提供了一份可供研究人员使用的清单,以促进和确保整个miRNA定量和分析过程的控制。我们期望这些建议能够提高研究结果的可重复性,并最终促进将循环miRNA谱作为下一代疾病生物标志物纳入临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences publishes comprehensive and high quality review articles in all areas of clinical laboratory science, including clinical biochemistry, hematology, microbiology, pathology, transfusion medicine, genetics, immunology and molecular diagnostics. The reviews critically evaluate the status of current issues in the selected areas, with a focus on clinical laboratory diagnostics and latest advances. The adjective “critical” implies a balanced synthesis of results and conclusions that are frequently contradictory and controversial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信