The Prevalence and Morphometry of the Atlas Vertebra Retrotransverse Foramen.

Q3 Medicine
Christos Lyrtzis, George Tsakotos, Michael Kostares, Maria Piagkou, Chrysovalantis Mariorakis, Konstantinos Natsis
{"title":"The Prevalence and Morphometry of the Atlas Vertebra Retrotransverse Foramen.","authors":"Christos Lyrtzis,&nbsp;George Tsakotos,&nbsp;Michael Kostares,&nbsp;Maria Piagkou,&nbsp;Chrysovalantis Mariorakis,&nbsp;Konstantinos Natsis","doi":"10.5644/ama2006-124.388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current study records the prevalence of the accessory foramen, located posterior to the transverse foramen (TF), the so-called the retrotransverse foramen (RTF), its morphometry, exact location, and coexistence with ossified posterior bridges. Additionally, factors associated with the length of the RTF are investigated.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>One-hundred and forty-one dried atlas vertebrae were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven out of the 141 vertebrae (26.2%) had at least one RTF. The RTF was unilateral in 67.6% and bilateral in 32.4%. The mean RTF anteroposterior diameter (length) was 4.2±1.4 mm on the right and 3.8±1.0 mm on the left side. The mean RTF laterolateral diameter (width) was 2.6±1.2 mm on the right and 2.5±0.8 mm on the left side. Both dimensions were symmetrical. The RTF was symmetrically located from the TF, at a mean distance of 4.6±1.1 mm on the right and of 4.5±0.9 mm on the left side. For the given TF-RTF distance, laterality, and presence of posterior bridges, each mm increase in the RTF width was associated with a 0.74 mm increase in the relevant length.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The estimated prevalence was higher than most of those reported in other studies. However, the between-studies prevalence varies to a significant degree. Hence, a systematic review and meta-analysis should be performed to identify a more precise estimate due to the clinical importance of the RTF.</p>","PeriodicalId":38313,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica academica","volume":"51 3","pages":"189-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/54/40/AMA-51-189.PMC10116178.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica academica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5644/ama2006-124.388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The current study records the prevalence of the accessory foramen, located posterior to the transverse foramen (TF), the so-called the retrotransverse foramen (RTF), its morphometry, exact location, and coexistence with ossified posterior bridges. Additionally, factors associated with the length of the RTF are investigated.

Materials: One-hundred and forty-one dried atlas vertebrae were examined.

Results: Thirty-seven out of the 141 vertebrae (26.2%) had at least one RTF. The RTF was unilateral in 67.6% and bilateral in 32.4%. The mean RTF anteroposterior diameter (length) was 4.2±1.4 mm on the right and 3.8±1.0 mm on the left side. The mean RTF laterolateral diameter (width) was 2.6±1.2 mm on the right and 2.5±0.8 mm on the left side. Both dimensions were symmetrical. The RTF was symmetrically located from the TF, at a mean distance of 4.6±1.1 mm on the right and of 4.5±0.9 mm on the left side. For the given TF-RTF distance, laterality, and presence of posterior bridges, each mm increase in the RTF width was associated with a 0.74 mm increase in the relevant length.

Conclusion: The estimated prevalence was higher than most of those reported in other studies. However, the between-studies prevalence varies to a significant degree. Hence, a systematic review and meta-analysis should be performed to identify a more precise estimate due to the clinical importance of the RTF.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

寰椎横后孔的流行及形态测定。
目的:本研究记录了位于横孔(TF)后方的副孔(即所谓的后横孔(RTF))的流行情况、其形态、确切位置以及与骨化后桥的共存情况。此外,研究了与RTF长度相关的因素。材料:研究了141块干椎体。结果:141个椎体中有37个(26.2%)至少有一个RTF。单侧RTF占67.6%,双侧RTF占32.4%。右侧RTF前后径(长度)平均为4.2±1.4 mm,左侧RTF前后径(长度)平均为3.8±1.0 mm。右侧RTF外侧直径(宽度)平均为2.6±1.2 mm,左侧RTF外侧直径(宽度)平均为2.5±0.8 mm。两个维度都是对称的。RTF与TF对称分布,右侧平均距离4.6±1.1 mm,左侧平均距离4.5±0.9 mm。对于给定的TF-RTF距离、侧度和存在后桥,RTF宽度每增加mm,相关长度增加0.74 mm。结论:估计患病率高于大多数其他研究报告。然而,研究之间的患病率差异很大。因此,由于RTF的临床重要性,应该进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以确定更精确的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta medica academica
Acta medica academica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信