Real-life anti-smoking practices among Polish neurologists.

Magdalena Konopko, Przemysław Bieńkowski, Marcin Wojnar, Jerzy Samochowiec, Danuta K Ryglewicz, Halina Sienkiewicz-Jarosz
{"title":"Real-life anti-smoking practices among Polish neurologists.","authors":"Magdalena Konopko,&nbsp;Przemysław Bieńkowski,&nbsp;Marcin Wojnar,&nbsp;Jerzy Samochowiec,&nbsp;Danuta K Ryglewicz,&nbsp;Halina Sienkiewicz-Jarosz","doi":"10.5114/ppn.2021.110680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the present study was to assess attitudes of Polish neurologists towards cigarette smoking and their real-life anti-smoking practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A study questionnaire was constructed, and distributed among Polish neurologists (<i>n</i> = 101; 73% females). More than two thirds (70%) of the study group worked in in-patient neurological wards with separate stroke units.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy five percent of the study group documented the smoking status of their patients in medical files. Two thirds of the study group collected data on patient's cigarette smoking during each visit. Only 54% and 22% of study participants routinely assessed the severity of tobacco dependence and diagnosed tobacco dependence according to the ICD-10 criteria, respectively. Two thirds of physicians declared routinely using any anti-smoking intervention, but only 12% used the recommended 5'A (Ask, Advice, Assess, Assist, Arrange) model of behavioral intervention and only 11% introduced Evidence Based Medicine (EBM)-supported pharmacotherapy. The vast majority of study participants (80%) did not try to increase their professional skills in anti-smoking interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Real-life anti-smoking practices among Polish neurologists are generally unsatisfactory and do not follow EBM-based guidelines. The low percentage of neurologists who diagnose and treat nicotine dependence may negatively impact the efficacy of secondary stroke prevention in Poland.</p>","PeriodicalId":74481,"journal":{"name":"Postepy psychiatrii neurologii","volume":"30 3","pages":"162-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/19/9c/PPN-30-45612.PMC9881626.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy psychiatrii neurologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ppn.2021.110680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to assess attitudes of Polish neurologists towards cigarette smoking and their real-life anti-smoking practices.

Methods: A study questionnaire was constructed, and distributed among Polish neurologists (n = 101; 73% females). More than two thirds (70%) of the study group worked in in-patient neurological wards with separate stroke units.

Results: Seventy five percent of the study group documented the smoking status of their patients in medical files. Two thirds of the study group collected data on patient's cigarette smoking during each visit. Only 54% and 22% of study participants routinely assessed the severity of tobacco dependence and diagnosed tobacco dependence according to the ICD-10 criteria, respectively. Two thirds of physicians declared routinely using any anti-smoking intervention, but only 12% used the recommended 5'A (Ask, Advice, Assess, Assist, Arrange) model of behavioral intervention and only 11% introduced Evidence Based Medicine (EBM)-supported pharmacotherapy. The vast majority of study participants (80%) did not try to increase their professional skills in anti-smoking interventions.

Conclusions: Real-life anti-smoking practices among Polish neurologists are generally unsatisfactory and do not follow EBM-based guidelines. The low percentage of neurologists who diagnose and treat nicotine dependence may negatively impact the efficacy of secondary stroke prevention in Poland.

波兰神经科医生的反吸烟实践。
目的:本研究的目的是评估波兰神经科医生对吸烟的态度和他们现实生活中的反吸烟做法。方法:制作研究问卷,对波兰神经科医师进行调查(n = 101;73%的女性)。超过三分之二(70%)的研究组在有单独中风单元的神经内科住院病房工作。结果:75%的研究组在医疗档案中记录了他们病人的吸烟状况。三分之二的研究组在每次就诊时收集患者吸烟的数据。只有54%和22%的研究参与者分别按照ICD-10标准例行评估烟草依赖的严重程度和诊断烟草依赖。三分之二的医生声称常规使用任何反吸烟干预措施,但只有12%的医生使用了推荐的5'A(询问、建议、评估、协助、安排)行为干预模式,只有11%的医生采用了循证医学(EBM)支持的药物治疗。绝大多数研究参与者(80%)没有尝试提高他们在反吸烟干预方面的专业技能。结论:波兰神经科医生在现实生活中的反吸烟实践通常不令人满意,不遵循循证医学指南。诊断和治疗尼古丁依赖的神经科医生的低百分比可能会对波兰继发性中风预防的疗效产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信