Robotic thymectomy: a review of techniques and results.

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Danilo Coco, Silvana Leanza
{"title":"Robotic thymectomy: a review of techniques and results.","authors":"Danilo Coco,&nbsp;Silvana Leanza","doi":"10.5114/kitp.2023.126097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thymectomy is a well-established therapeutic option in the multidisciplinary treatment of nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis (MG) and in thymoma treatment. Although many surgical procedures for thymectomy have been identified, the transsternal method is still regarded as the gold standard. Minimally invasive procedures, on the other hand, have achieved popularity in the last decades and are now extensively used in this field of surgery. Among them, robotic thymectomy has been the most cutting-edge surgical procedure. Several authors and meta-analyses have shown that a minimally invasive approach to thymectomy is associated with improved surgical results and fewer complications in surgery compared to transsternal open thymectomy, without any substantial changes in myasthenia gravis complete rates of remission. Hence, in the present review of the literature, we aimed to describe and delineate the techniques, advantages, outcomes, and future perspectives of robotic thymectomy. Existing evidence suggests that robotic thymectomy will likely become the gold standard for thymectomy in early stage thymomas and MG subjects. Many of the drawbacks related to other minimally invasive procedures appear to be resolved by robotic thymectomy, and long-term neurological outcomes are satisfactory. In addition, improved vision and high dexterity of instrument movements enable safe and complete thymic tissue dissection, superior to standard thoracoscopic procedures. The access with minimally invasive surgery VATS (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) or RATS (robot-assisted thoracic surgery) access in its various variants allows the extent of mediastinal fat resection due to the possibility of ectopic thymic foci in the mediastinum determining the long-term outcome in the group of patients operated on for myasthenia gravis. However, it was recommended to carry out better designed, multi-centre, randomized studies to arrive at definitive conclusions on robotic thymectomy for thymomas and myasthenia gravis treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49945,"journal":{"name":"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska","volume":"20 1","pages":"36-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/85/72/KITP-20-50410.PMC10107420.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2023.126097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thymectomy is a well-established therapeutic option in the multidisciplinary treatment of nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis (MG) and in thymoma treatment. Although many surgical procedures for thymectomy have been identified, the transsternal method is still regarded as the gold standard. Minimally invasive procedures, on the other hand, have achieved popularity in the last decades and are now extensively used in this field of surgery. Among them, robotic thymectomy has been the most cutting-edge surgical procedure. Several authors and meta-analyses have shown that a minimally invasive approach to thymectomy is associated with improved surgical results and fewer complications in surgery compared to transsternal open thymectomy, without any substantial changes in myasthenia gravis complete rates of remission. Hence, in the present review of the literature, we aimed to describe and delineate the techniques, advantages, outcomes, and future perspectives of robotic thymectomy. Existing evidence suggests that robotic thymectomy will likely become the gold standard for thymectomy in early stage thymomas and MG subjects. Many of the drawbacks related to other minimally invasive procedures appear to be resolved by robotic thymectomy, and long-term neurological outcomes are satisfactory. In addition, improved vision and high dexterity of instrument movements enable safe and complete thymic tissue dissection, superior to standard thoracoscopic procedures. The access with minimally invasive surgery VATS (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) or RATS (robot-assisted thoracic surgery) access in its various variants allows the extent of mediastinal fat resection due to the possibility of ectopic thymic foci in the mediastinum determining the long-term outcome in the group of patients operated on for myasthenia gravis. However, it was recommended to carry out better designed, multi-centre, randomized studies to arrive at definitive conclusions on robotic thymectomy for thymomas and myasthenia gravis treatment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

机器人胸腺切除术:技术和结果综述。
胸腺切除术在非胸腺瘤性重症肌无力(MG)和胸腺瘤治疗的多学科治疗中是一种行之有效的治疗选择。虽然许多胸腺切除术的手术方法已经确定,经胸骨法仍然被认为是金标准。另一方面,微创手术在过去的几十年里得到了普及,现在广泛应用于这一外科领域。其中,机器人胸腺切除术一直是最尖端的外科手术。几位作者和荟荟性分析表明,与经胸骨切开胸腺切除术相比,微创胸腺切除术可改善手术效果,减少手术并发症,重症肌无力完全缓解率无实质性变化。因此,在目前的文献综述中,我们旨在描述和描述机器人胸腺切除术的技术、优势、结果和未来的前景。现有证据表明,机器人胸腺切除术可能成为早期胸腺瘤和MG患者胸腺切除术的金标准。机器人胸腺切除术解决了其他微创手术的许多缺点,并且长期的神经预后令人满意。此外,与标准胸腔镜手术相比,视力的改善和器械移动的高度灵活性使胸腺组织解剖更加安全和完整。微创手术VATS(视频辅助胸腔镜手术)或RATS(机器人辅助胸外科手术)在其各种形式的进入允许纵隔脂肪切除的程度,因为纵隔胸腺病灶异位的可能性决定了重症肌无力手术组患者的长期预后。然而,建议进行更好的设计,多中心,随机研究,以得出机器人胸腺切除术治疗胸腺瘤和重症肌无力的明确结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Polish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is a quarterly aimed at cardiologists, cardiosurgeons and thoracic surgeons. Includes the original works (experimental, research and development), illustrative and casuistical works about cardiology and cardiosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信