Testing the relationship between lateralization on sequence-based motor tasks and language laterality using an online battery.

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Jack H Grant, Adam J Parker, Jessica C Hodgson, John M Hudson, Dorothy V M Bishop
{"title":"Testing the relationship between lateralization on sequence-based motor tasks and language laterality using an online battery.","authors":"Jack H Grant,&nbsp;Adam J Parker,&nbsp;Jessica C Hodgson,&nbsp;John M Hudson,&nbsp;Dorothy V M Bishop","doi":"10.1080/1357650X.2022.2129668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>ABSTRACT</b>Studies have highlighted an association between motor laterality and speech production laterality. It is thought that common demands for sequential processing may underlie this association. However, most studies in this area have relied on relatively small samples and have infrequently explored the reliability of the tools used to assess lateralization. We, therefore, established the validity and reliability of an online battery measuring sequence-based motor laterality and language laterality before exploring the associations between laterality indices on language and motor tasks. The online battery was completed by 621 participants, 52 of whom returned to complete the battery a second time. The three motor tasks included in the battery showed good between-session reliability (<i>r <i>≥</i></i> .78) and were lateralized in concordance with hand preference. The novel measure of speech production laterality was left lateralized at population level as predicted, but reliability was less satisfactory (<i>r </i>= .62). We found no evidence of an association between sequence-based motor laterality and language laterality. Those with a left-hand preference were more strongly lateralized on motor tasks requiring midline crossing; this effect was not observed in right-handers. We conclude that there is little evidence of the co-lateralization of language and sequence-based motor skill on this battery.</p>","PeriodicalId":47387,"journal":{"name":"Laterality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laterality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2022.2129668","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTStudies have highlighted an association between motor laterality and speech production laterality. It is thought that common demands for sequential processing may underlie this association. However, most studies in this area have relied on relatively small samples and have infrequently explored the reliability of the tools used to assess lateralization. We, therefore, established the validity and reliability of an online battery measuring sequence-based motor laterality and language laterality before exploring the associations between laterality indices on language and motor tasks. The online battery was completed by 621 participants, 52 of whom returned to complete the battery a second time. The three motor tasks included in the battery showed good between-session reliability (r  .78) and were lateralized in concordance with hand preference. The novel measure of speech production laterality was left lateralized at population level as predicted, but reliability was less satisfactory (r = .62). We found no evidence of an association between sequence-based motor laterality and language laterality. Those with a left-hand preference were more strongly lateralized on motor tasks requiring midline crossing; this effect was not observed in right-handers. We conclude that there is little evidence of the co-lateralization of language and sequence-based motor skill on this battery.

使用在线电池测试基于顺序的运动任务的偏侧性与语言偏侧性的关系。
摘要研究强调了运动侧性和言语产生侧性之间的联系。人们认为,对顺序处理的共同需求可能是这种关联的基础。然而,该领域的大多数研究都依赖于相对较小的样本,并且很少探索用于评估侧化的工具的可靠性。因此,我们在探索语言和运动任务的横向指数之间的关联之前,建立了基于序列的运动横向和语言横向在线电池测量的有效性和可靠性。621名参与者完成了在线测试,其中52人第二次返回完成测试。组内的三个运动任务表现出良好的会话间可靠性(r≥0.78),并且与手偏好相一致。正如预测的那样,新的言语产生偏侧性测量在总体水平上是偏侧的,但可靠性不太令人满意(r = 0.62)。我们没有发现基于序列的运动偏侧性和语言偏侧性之间存在关联的证据。那些偏爱左手的人在需要穿越中线的运动任务中表现出更强的偏侧性;这种效应在右撇子中没有观察到。我们的结论是,几乎没有证据表明语言和基于顺序的运动技能在这个电池上的共同侧化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laterality
Laterality Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition publishes high quality research on all aspects of lateralisation in humans and non-human species. Laterality"s principal interest is in the psychological, behavioural and neurological correlates of lateralisation. The editors will also consider accessible papers from any discipline which can illuminate the general problems of the evolution of biological and neural asymmetry, papers on the cultural, linguistic, artistic and social consequences of lateral asymmetry, and papers on its historical origins and development. The interests of workers in laterality are typically broad.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信