Vaping and socioeconomic inequalities in smoking cessation and relapse: a longitudinal analysis of the UK Household Longitudinal Study.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Iain Hardie, Michael James Green
{"title":"Vaping and socioeconomic inequalities in smoking cessation and relapse: a longitudinal analysis of the UK Household Longitudinal Study.","authors":"Iain Hardie, Michael James Green","doi":"10.1136/tc-2022-057728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smoking is a key cause of socioeconomic health inequalities. Vaping is considered less harmful than smoking and has become a popular smoking cessation aid, and therefore has potential to reduce inequalities in smoking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used longitudinal data from 25 102 participants in waves 8-10 (2016 to early 2020) of the UK Household Longitudinal Study to examine how vaping affects socioeconomic inequalities in smoking cessation and relapse. Marginal structural models were used to investigate whether vaping mediates or moderates associations between educational attainment and smoking cessation and relapse over time. Multiple imputation and weights were used to adjust for missing data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents without degrees were less likely to stop smoking than those with a degree (OR: 0.65; 95% CI 0.54-0.77), and more likely to relapse (OR: 1.74; 95% CI 1.37-2.22), but this inequality in smoking cessation was not present among regular vapers (OR: 0.99; 95% CI 0.54-1.82). Sensitivity analyses suggested that this finding did not hold when comparing those with or without any qualifications. Inequalities in smoking relapse did not clearly differ by vaping status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vaping may be especially helpful as a cessation aid for smokers without degree level education and therefore may help reduce inequalities in smoking. Nevertheless, other supports or aids may be needed to reach the most disadvantaged (ie, those with no qualifications) and to help people avoid relapse after cessation, though we did not find clear evidence suggesting that vaping would increase inequalities in relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2022-057728","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Smoking is a key cause of socioeconomic health inequalities. Vaping is considered less harmful than smoking and has become a popular smoking cessation aid, and therefore has potential to reduce inequalities in smoking.

Methods: We used longitudinal data from 25 102 participants in waves 8-10 (2016 to early 2020) of the UK Household Longitudinal Study to examine how vaping affects socioeconomic inequalities in smoking cessation and relapse. Marginal structural models were used to investigate whether vaping mediates or moderates associations between educational attainment and smoking cessation and relapse over time. Multiple imputation and weights were used to adjust for missing data.

Results: Respondents without degrees were less likely to stop smoking than those with a degree (OR: 0.65; 95% CI 0.54-0.77), and more likely to relapse (OR: 1.74; 95% CI 1.37-2.22), but this inequality in smoking cessation was not present among regular vapers (OR: 0.99; 95% CI 0.54-1.82). Sensitivity analyses suggested that this finding did not hold when comparing those with or without any qualifications. Inequalities in smoking relapse did not clearly differ by vaping status.

Conclusions: Vaping may be especially helpful as a cessation aid for smokers without degree level education and therefore may help reduce inequalities in smoking. Nevertheless, other supports or aids may be needed to reach the most disadvantaged (ie, those with no qualifications) and to help people avoid relapse after cessation, though we did not find clear evidence suggesting that vaping would increase inequalities in relapse.

吸烟与戒烟和复吸中的社会经济不平等:英国家庭纵向研究的纵向分析。
背景:吸烟是造成社会经济健康不平等的一个主要原因。与吸烟相比,吸食电子烟被认为危害较小,已成为一种流行的戒烟辅助工具,因此有可能减少吸烟中的不平等现象:我们利用英国家庭纵向研究第 8-10 波(2016 年至 2020 年初)中 25 102 名参与者的纵向数据,研究了吸食电子烟如何影响戒烟和复吸中的社会经济不平等。边际结构模型用于研究吸烟是否会随着时间的推移调解或调节教育程度与戒烟和复吸之间的关系。使用多重估算和权重来调整缺失数据:结果:与有学位的受访者相比,没有学位的受访者戒烟的可能性更低(OR:0.65;95% CI 0.54-0.77),复吸的可能性更高(OR:1.74;95% CI 1.37-2.22),但这种戒烟的不平等在经常吸烟的受访者中并不存在(OR:0.99;95% CI 0.54-1.82)。敏感性分析表明,在比较有无任何资历的吸烟者时,这一结果并不成立。吸烟状况不同,复吸率的不平等也没有明显差异:对于没有受过学位教育的吸烟者来说,吸食电子烟作为一种戒烟辅助手段可能特别有帮助,因此可能有助于减少吸烟的不平等现象。尽管如此,可能还需要其他支持或辅助手段来帮助最弱势群体(即那些没有学历的人),并帮助人们避免戒烟后复吸,尽管我们没有发现明确的证据表明吸食电子烟会增加复吸的不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信