Parental Perception of Oral Health and Oral Health Status of Pediatric Patients Attending an Urban Craniofacial Center.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-18 DOI:10.1177/10556656231170136
Lydia DeJonge, Evelina Kratunova, Heng Wang, Pravin Patel, David Avenetti, Sahar Alrayyes
{"title":"Parental Perception of Oral Health and Oral Health Status of Pediatric Patients Attending an Urban Craniofacial Center.","authors":"Lydia DeJonge, Evelina Kratunova, Heng Wang, Pravin Patel, David Avenetti, Sahar Alrayyes","doi":"10.1177/10556656231170136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives of this study were to assess the oral health status and parental perception of oral health needs of pediatric patients in an urban Craniofacial Center.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This research utilized a prospective cross-sectional matched study design. The data was collected prospectively via clinical oral examinations measuring dental caries experience and gingival health status. Parental perception of oral health was assessed through a validated questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted at a Pediatric Dentistry Department and Craniofacial Center (CFC) in a large urban American city.</p><p><strong>Patients/participants: </strong>Participants were recruited and enrolled from a CFC and Pediatric Dental Clinic.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>The outcome measures were the oral health status and parental perception thereof.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CFC patients' caries experience in primary teeth was significantly lower than that of a healthy matched cohort, but statistically similar in permanent teeth. CFC patients had significantly higher unmet dental treatment needs. CFC patients had poor oral hygiene and were shown to have significantly higher plaque levels and worse gingival health than that of a healthy matched cohort. Parental perception of oral health did not show a statistically significantly difference between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients in our study in an urban CFC were found to have a high unmet dental and poor oral hygiene. Despite the poor oral health status, parents of children with craniofacial anomalies did perceive their oral health as different from a matched cohort of patients without these conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55255,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231170136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objectives of this study were to assess the oral health status and parental perception of oral health needs of pediatric patients in an urban Craniofacial Center.

Design: This research utilized a prospective cross-sectional matched study design. The data was collected prospectively via clinical oral examinations measuring dental caries experience and gingival health status. Parental perception of oral health was assessed through a validated questionnaire.

Setting: The study was conducted at a Pediatric Dentistry Department and Craniofacial Center (CFC) in a large urban American city.

Patients/participants: Participants were recruited and enrolled from a CFC and Pediatric Dental Clinic.

Main outcome measure(s): The outcome measures were the oral health status and parental perception thereof.

Results: CFC patients' caries experience in primary teeth was significantly lower than that of a healthy matched cohort, but statistically similar in permanent teeth. CFC patients had significantly higher unmet dental treatment needs. CFC patients had poor oral hygiene and were shown to have significantly higher plaque levels and worse gingival health than that of a healthy matched cohort. Parental perception of oral health did not show a statistically significantly difference between the two groups.

Conclusions: Patients in our study in an urban CFC were found to have a high unmet dental and poor oral hygiene. Despite the poor oral health status, parents of children with craniofacial anomalies did perceive their oral health as different from a matched cohort of patients without these conditions.

在城市颅面中心就诊的小儿患者的家长对口腔健康和口腔健康状况的看法。
研究目的本研究旨在评估城市颅面中心儿科患者的口腔健康状况和家长对口腔健康需求的看法:本研究采用前瞻性横断面匹配研究设计。通过临床口腔检查测量龋齿情况和牙龈健康状况,收集前瞻性数据。家长对口腔健康的看法通过有效问卷进行评估:研究在美国一个大城市的儿童牙科和颅颌面中心(CFC)进行:主要结果测量:主要结果测量:结果测量为口腔健康状况和家长对口腔健康状况的看法:结果:氟氯化碳患者的基牙龋齿率明显低于健康匹配人群,但恒牙龋齿率在统计学上相似。氟氯化碳患者未得到满足的牙科治疗需求明显较高。与健康的匹配人群相比,氟氯化碳患者的口腔卫生状况较差,牙菌斑水平明显较高,牙龈健康状况也较差。父母对口腔健康的看法在两组之间没有明显的统计学差异:结论:在我们的研究中发现,城市熟食中心的患者牙病得不到及时治疗的比例较高,口腔卫生状况较差。尽管口腔健康状况较差,但颅面畸形儿童的家长确实认为他们的口腔健康状况与无颅面畸形的匹配患者不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
36.40%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信