The effect of early irregular cell division of human embryos on blastocyst euploidy: considerations from the subsequent development of the blastomeres by direct or reverse cleavage

Shinichi Watanabe B.V.Sc. , Kaori Yoshikai M.S. , Yukino Matsuda B.S. , Shunsuke Miyai Ph.D. , Yuki Sawada M.D., Ph.D. , Hiroki Kurahashi M.D., Ph.D. , Tomio Sawada M.D., Ph.D.
{"title":"The effect of early irregular cell division of human embryos on blastocyst euploidy: considerations from the subsequent development of the blastomeres by direct or reverse cleavage","authors":"Shinichi Watanabe B.V.Sc. ,&nbsp;Kaori Yoshikai M.S. ,&nbsp;Yukino Matsuda B.S. ,&nbsp;Shunsuke Miyai Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Yuki Sawada M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Hiroki Kurahashi M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Tomio Sawada M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfss.2022.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate whether blastocysts that divide irregularly reduce subsequent blastocyst euploidy.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Private clinic.</p></div><div><h3>Patient(s)</h3><p>A total of 122 blastocysts for which consent for disposal and research use was obtained.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention(s)</h3><p>None.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure(s)</h3><p>Results of next-generation sequencing analysis of the blastocysts and whether blastomeres by normal or irregular divisions subsequently participated in blastocyst formation or not.</p></div><div><h3>Result(s)</h3><p>The embryos were classified according to their dynamics until the second cleavage. The blastocyst euploidy rates were 33.3% (19/57) in the normal cleavage (NC) group, 38.3% (18/47) in the direct cleavage (embryos with one cell dividing into 3 cells) (DC) group, and 72.2% (13/18) in the reverse cleavage (RC) (embryos with fused cells once divided) group. The rate of the RC group was significantly higher than that of the NC group.</p><p>The blastocyst participation rate of the blastomeres were 95.6% in the NC group and 56.5% in that derived from DC of the first cleavage, and 91.7% in that of blastomeres derived from normal division of the second cleavage and 53.6% in that derived from DC of the second cleavage, both of which were significantly lower in the latter. In the RC group, the rates of fused and nonfused blastomeres were 62.1% and 87.5%, respectively, with no significant difference.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><p>The blastomeres generated by DC were often excluded from blastocyst formation, and we speculate that this is one reason why their division does not reduce blastocyst euploidy. The association between RC and euploidy of blastocysts merits further study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73012,"journal":{"name":"F&S science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F&S science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666335X22000751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate whether blastocysts that divide irregularly reduce subsequent blastocyst euploidy.

Design

Retrospective study.

Setting

Private clinic.

Patient(s)

A total of 122 blastocysts for which consent for disposal and research use was obtained.

Intervention(s)

None.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Results of next-generation sequencing analysis of the blastocysts and whether blastomeres by normal or irregular divisions subsequently participated in blastocyst formation or not.

Result(s)

The embryos were classified according to their dynamics until the second cleavage. The blastocyst euploidy rates were 33.3% (19/57) in the normal cleavage (NC) group, 38.3% (18/47) in the direct cleavage (embryos with one cell dividing into 3 cells) (DC) group, and 72.2% (13/18) in the reverse cleavage (RC) (embryos with fused cells once divided) group. The rate of the RC group was significantly higher than that of the NC group.

The blastocyst participation rate of the blastomeres were 95.6% in the NC group and 56.5% in that derived from DC of the first cleavage, and 91.7% in that of blastomeres derived from normal division of the second cleavage and 53.6% in that derived from DC of the second cleavage, both of which were significantly lower in the latter. In the RC group, the rates of fused and nonfused blastomeres were 62.1% and 87.5%, respectively, with no significant difference.

Conclusion(s)

The blastomeres generated by DC were often excluded from blastocyst formation, and we speculate that this is one reason why their division does not reduce blastocyst euploidy. The association between RC and euploidy of blastocysts merits further study.

人类胚胎早期不规则细胞分裂对囊胚整倍性的影响:从卵裂球直接或反向分裂的后续发育考虑
目的探讨胚泡不规则分裂是否会降低随后的胚泡整倍体。DesignRetrospective研究。私人诊所。病人。共有122个囊胚,已获得弃置及研究用途的同意。干预措施主要观察指标(5)下一代囊胚测序分析结果,以及正常或不规则分裂的囊胚是否参与了囊胚的形成。结果(5)胚胎在第二次卵裂前按其动态进行分类。正常卵裂(NC)组囊胚整倍性为33.3%(19/57),直接卵裂(一个细胞分裂成3个细胞的胚胎)组囊胚整倍性为38.3%(18/47),反向卵裂(一次分裂融合细胞的胚胎)组囊胚整倍性为72.2%(13/18)。RC组的发生率显著高于NC组。NC组囊胚参与率为95.6%,第一次卵裂DC组囊胚参与率为56.5%,第二次卵裂正常分裂的囊胚参与率为91.7%,第二次卵裂DC组囊胚参与率为53.6%,后者囊胚参与率均显著低于NC组。在RC组中,融合和未融合的卵裂球率分别为62.1%和87.5%,差异无统计学意义。结论(5)DC产生的卵裂球经常被排除在囊胚形成之外,我们推测这是其分裂不能降低囊胚整倍性的原因之一。RC与囊胚整倍体的关系值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F&S science
F&S science Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Urology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信