Prediction parameters of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction improvement in patients after acute coronary syndrome.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Marija Bjelobrk, Tatjana Miljković, Aleksandra Ilić, Aleksandra Milovančev, Snežana Tadić, Snežana Bjelić, Dragana Dabović, Milenko Čanković, Vladimir Ivanović, Andrej Preveden, Dejana Popović
{"title":"Prediction parameters of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction improvement in patients after acute coronary syndrome.","authors":"Marija Bjelobrk,&nbsp;Tatjana Miljković,&nbsp;Aleksandra Ilić,&nbsp;Aleksandra Milovančev,&nbsp;Snežana Tadić,&nbsp;Snežana Bjelić,&nbsp;Dragana Dabović,&nbsp;Milenko Čanković,&nbsp;Vladimir Ivanović,&nbsp;Andrej Preveden,&nbsp;Dejana Popović","doi":"10.1080/17843286.2022.2114678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the effects of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CCR) in patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) resolved by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and to extract the parameters that have the greatest influence on LVDD improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 85 subjects who were divided into intervention (N = 56) and control (N = 29) groups depending on CCR attendance. Initially and after 12 weeks, patients of both groups were subjected to echocardiography to assess LVDD, as well as CPET to assess improvement in functional capacity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study showed that 23 patients (27.1%) of both groups demonstrated the improvement of LVDD degree. The improvement of the LVDD degree in the intervention group was significant, whereas in the control group, it did not change (a one-degree improvement in 22 (39.3%) patients of the intervention group (p < 0.001) and only 1 (3.4%) (p > 0.05) in the control group). Multivariate binary logistic regression showed that key parameters in LVDD improvement were participation in the CCR, E/A ratio and haemoglobin value. We created a model, for prediction of LVDF improvement, with a cut-off value of 33 (area = 0.9, p < 0.0005), a sensitivity of 87.0% and a specificity of 85.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CCR can be used as an effective non-pharmacological measure to improve LVDD and functional capacity in patients after ACS. The statistical model may have practical application in prediction of clinical benefit in such a group of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7086,"journal":{"name":"Acta Clinica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Clinica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2022.2114678","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CCR) in patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) resolved by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and to extract the parameters that have the greatest influence on LVDD improvement.

Methods: The study included 85 subjects who were divided into intervention (N = 56) and control (N = 29) groups depending on CCR attendance. Initially and after 12 weeks, patients of both groups were subjected to echocardiography to assess LVDD, as well as CPET to assess improvement in functional capacity.

Results: The study showed that 23 patients (27.1%) of both groups demonstrated the improvement of LVDD degree. The improvement of the LVDD degree in the intervention group was significant, whereas in the control group, it did not change (a one-degree improvement in 22 (39.3%) patients of the intervention group (p < 0.001) and only 1 (3.4%) (p > 0.05) in the control group). Multivariate binary logistic regression showed that key parameters in LVDD improvement were participation in the CCR, E/A ratio and haemoglobin value. We created a model, for prediction of LVDF improvement, with a cut-off value of 33 (area = 0.9, p < 0.0005), a sensitivity of 87.0% and a specificity of 85.5%.

Conclusions: CCR can be used as an effective non-pharmacological measure to improve LVDD and functional capacity in patients after ACS. The statistical model may have practical application in prediction of clinical benefit in such a group of patients.

急性冠脉综合征患者左室舒张功能改善的预测参数。
目的:本研究旨在探讨经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)缓解急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者的心脏综合康复(CCR)对左室舒张功能障碍(LVDD)的影响,并提取对LVDD改善影响最大的参数。方法:85例受试者根据CCR出勤率分为干预组(56例)和对照组(29例)。最初和12周后,两组患者均接受超声心动图评估LVDD, CPET评估功能能力改善情况。结果:两组患者均有23例(27.1%)LVDD程度改善。干预组LVDD度改善显著,对照组无明显变化(干预组22例(39.3%)患者LVDD度改善1度,对照组差异有统计学意义(p 0.05)。多元二元logistic回归分析显示,参与CCR、E/A比和血红蛋白值是LVDD改善的关键参数。我们建立了预测LVDF改善的模型,截断值为33(面积= 0.9,p)。结论:CCR可作为改善ACS患者LVDD和功能容量的有效非药物措施。该统计模型在预测此类患者的临床获益方面可能具有实际应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Clinica Belgica
Acta Clinica Belgica 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Clinica Belgica: International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine primarily publishes papers on clinical medicine, clinical chemistry, pathology and molecular biology, provided they describe results which contribute to our understanding of clinical problems or describe new methods applicable to clinical investigation. Readership includes physicians, pathologists, pharmacists and physicians working in non-academic and academic hospitals, practicing internal medicine and its subspecialties.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信