A Testlet Diagnostic Classification Model with Attribute Hierarchies.

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL
Applied Psychological Measurement Pub Date : 2023-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-21 DOI:10.1177/01466216231165315
Wenchao Ma, Chun Wang, Jiaying Xiao
{"title":"A Testlet Diagnostic Classification Model with Attribute Hierarchies.","authors":"Wenchao Ma, Chun Wang, Jiaying Xiao","doi":"10.1177/01466216231165315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article, a testlet hierarchical diagnostic classification model (TH-DCM) was introduced to take both attribute hierarchies and item bundles into account. The expectation-maximization algorithm with an analytic dimension reduction technique was used for parameter estimation. A simulation study was conducted to assess the parameter recovery of the proposed model under varied conditions, and to compare TH-DCM with testlet higher-order CDM (THO-DCM; Hansen, M. (2013). Hierarchical item response models for cognitive diagnosis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). UCLA; Zhan, P., Li, X., Wang, W.-C., Bian, Y., & Wang, L. (2015). The multidimensional testlet-effect cognitive diagnostic models. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(5), 689. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00689). Results showed that (1) ignoring large testlet effects worsened parameter recovery, (2) DCMs assuming equal testlet effects within each testlet performed as well as the testlet model assuming unequal testlet effects under most conditions, (3) misspecifications in joint attribute distribution had an differential impact on parameter recovery, and (4) THO-DCM seems to be a robust alternative to TH-DCM under some hierarchical structures. A set of real data was also analyzed for illustration.</p>","PeriodicalId":48300,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychological Measurement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10126385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216231165315","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, a testlet hierarchical diagnostic classification model (TH-DCM) was introduced to take both attribute hierarchies and item bundles into account. The expectation-maximization algorithm with an analytic dimension reduction technique was used for parameter estimation. A simulation study was conducted to assess the parameter recovery of the proposed model under varied conditions, and to compare TH-DCM with testlet higher-order CDM (THO-DCM; Hansen, M. (2013). Hierarchical item response models for cognitive diagnosis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). UCLA; Zhan, P., Li, X., Wang, W.-C., Bian, Y., & Wang, L. (2015). The multidimensional testlet-effect cognitive diagnostic models. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(5), 689. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00689). Results showed that (1) ignoring large testlet effects worsened parameter recovery, (2) DCMs assuming equal testlet effects within each testlet performed as well as the testlet model assuming unequal testlet effects under most conditions, (3) misspecifications in joint attribute distribution had an differential impact on parameter recovery, and (4) THO-DCM seems to be a robust alternative to TH-DCM under some hierarchical structures. A set of real data was also analyzed for illustration.

带属性层次的小测试诊断分类模型
本文引入了一种子测试分层诊断分类模型(Testlet hierarchical diagnostic classification model,TH-DCM),将属性分层和项目捆绑考虑在内。参数估计采用了期望最大化算法和解析降维技术。研究人员进行了一项模拟研究,以评估所提出模型在不同条件下的参数恢复情况,并将 TH-DCM 与测试子高阶 CDM(THO-DCM;Hansen, M. (2013)。用于认知诊断的分层项目反应模型(未发表的博士论文)。UCLA; Zhan, P., Li, X., Wang, W.-C., Bian, Y., & Wang, L. (2015).多维试题效应认知诊断模型。Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(5), 689. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00689)。结果表明:(1) 忽略大的小测验效应会恶化参数恢复;(2) 在大多数条件下,假设每个小测验内的小测验效应相等的多维小测验效应认知诊断模型与假设小测验效应不相等的小测验效应认知诊断模型表现一样好;(3) 联合属性分布的错误规范对参数恢复有不同程度的影响;(4) 在某些层次结构下,THO-DCM似乎是TH-DCM的稳健替代品。为了说明问题,还分析了一组真实数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Applied Psychological Measurement publishes empirical research on the application of techniques of psychological measurement to substantive problems in all areas of psychology and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信