Adjunctive Cilostazol in Patients With High Residual Platelet Reactivity After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Center, Prospective Study (ADJUST-HPR).

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
American journal of therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-25 DOI:10.1097/MJT.0000000000000244
Guo Long Zhe, Long Hau Yu, Dong-Hyun Lee, Moo Hyun Kim, Victor Serebruany
{"title":"Adjunctive Cilostazol in Patients With High Residual Platelet Reactivity After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Center, Prospective Study (ADJUST-HPR).","authors":"Guo Long Zhe, Long Hau Yu, Dong-Hyun Lee, Moo Hyun Kim, Victor Serebruany","doi":"10.1097/MJT.0000000000000244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cilostazol as an adjunct to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) postcoronary stenting may further reduce vascular occlusion risks. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of cilostazol on high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) in patients undergoing drug-eluting coronary stent implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized, open-label, single-center, prospective study, the degree of platelet inhibition by cilostazol 100 mg twice daily was assessed on top of conventional DAPT compared with standard clopidogrel and low-dose aspirin combination in poststent patients with HRPR. HRPR was defined as P2Y12 units (PRU) > 240 as measured by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. In addition, the platelet activity was assessed by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) and Multiplate electrode analyzer (MEA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total of 148 patients were screened, and HRPR was observed in 64 (43.2%). Those were randomized for DAPT versus triple therapy (TAPT). After 30 days, TAPT group exhibited significantly lower rate of HRPR when assessed by all 3 devices (VerifyNow: 40.0 vs. 66.7% P = 0.04, LTA: 6.7 vs. 30.0% P = 0.02, MEA: 10.0 vs. 30.0% P = 0.05 L all vs. DAPT). Also, higher absolute mean difference in TAPT versus DAPT group after 30 days (VerifyNow: 71.3 ± 38.2 vs. 24.6 ± 40.2 P < 0.001, LTA: 23.9 ± 15.1 vs. 9.4 ± 11.8 P < 0.001, MEA: 9.3 ± 12.9 vs. 2.4 ± 17.3 P = 0.08) was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cilostazol in addition to standard DAPT reduces the incidence of HRPR and diminishes further platelet activity in poststent patients. Whether this favorable laboratory finding will affect clinical outcomes requires an adequately powered randomized trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":7760,"journal":{"name":"American journal of therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MJT.0000000000000244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cilostazol as an adjunct to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) postcoronary stenting may further reduce vascular occlusion risks. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of cilostazol on high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) in patients undergoing drug-eluting coronary stent implantation.

Methods: In a randomized, open-label, single-center, prospective study, the degree of platelet inhibition by cilostazol 100 mg twice daily was assessed on top of conventional DAPT compared with standard clopidogrel and low-dose aspirin combination in poststent patients with HRPR. HRPR was defined as P2Y12 units (PRU) > 240 as measured by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. In addition, the platelet activity was assessed by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) and Multiplate electrode analyzer (MEA).

Results: The total of 148 patients were screened, and HRPR was observed in 64 (43.2%). Those were randomized for DAPT versus triple therapy (TAPT). After 30 days, TAPT group exhibited significantly lower rate of HRPR when assessed by all 3 devices (VerifyNow: 40.0 vs. 66.7% P = 0.04, LTA: 6.7 vs. 30.0% P = 0.02, MEA: 10.0 vs. 30.0% P = 0.05 L all vs. DAPT). Also, higher absolute mean difference in TAPT versus DAPT group after 30 days (VerifyNow: 71.3 ± 38.2 vs. 24.6 ± 40.2 P < 0.001, LTA: 23.9 ± 15.1 vs. 9.4 ± 11.8 P < 0.001, MEA: 9.3 ± 12.9 vs. 2.4 ± 17.3 P = 0.08) was observed.

Conclusions: Cilostazol in addition to standard DAPT reduces the incidence of HRPR and diminishes further platelet activity in poststent patients. Whether this favorable laboratory finding will affect clinical outcomes requires an adequately powered randomized trial.

药物洗脱支架植入术后高残留血小板反应性患者的西洛他唑辅助治疗:一项随机、开放标签、单中心、前瞻性研究(ADJUST-HPR)。
背景:西洛他唑作为冠状动脉支架植入术后双联抗血小板疗法(DAPT)的辅助药物可进一步降低血管闭塞风险。本研究旨在评估西洛他唑对药物洗脱冠状动脉支架植入术患者高残留血小板反应性(HRPR)的影响:在一项随机、开放标签、单中心、前瞻性研究中,与标准氯吡格雷和小剂量阿司匹林联合用药相比,评估了西洛他唑100毫克,每日两次,在常规DAPT基础上对支架植入后HRPR患者血小板抑制程度的影响。HRPR 的定义是通过 VerifyNow P2Y12 检测法测得的 P2Y12 单位 (PRU) > 240。此外,还通过光透射聚集测定法(LTA)和多平板电极分析仪(MEA)评估了血小板活性:共有 148 名患者接受了筛查,其中 64 人(43.2%)观察到 HRPR。这些患者被随机分为 DAPT 组和三联疗法(TAPT)组。30 天后,TAPT 组的 HRPR 率在所有 3 种设备的评估中均明显较低(VerifyNow:40.0%对66.7%,P = 0.04;LTA:6.7%对30.0%,P = 0.02;MEA:10.0%对30.0%,P = 0.05 L,均对DAPT)。此外,还观察到 30 天后 TAPT 组与 DAPT 组的绝对平均差异更高(VerifyNow:71.3 ± 38.2 vs. 24.6 ± 40.2 P < 0.001;LTA:23.9 ± 15.1 vs. 9.4 ± 11.8 P < 0.001;MEA:9.3 ± 12.9 vs. 2.4 ± 17.3 P = 0.08):结论:在标准 DAPT 的基础上加用西洛他唑可降低支架术后患者 HRPR 的发生率,并进一步降低血小板活性。这一有利的实验室发现是否会影响临床结果,还需要进行充分有效的随机试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of therapeutics
American journal of therapeutics PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Therapeutics is an indispensable resource for all prescribing physicians who want to access pharmacological developments in cardiology, infectious disease, oncology, anesthesiology, nephrology, toxicology, and psychotropics without having to sift through stacks of medical journals. The journal features original articles on the latest therapeutic approaches as well as critical articles on the drug approval process and therapeutic reviews covering pharmacokinetics, regulatory affairs, pediatric clinical pharmacology, hypertension, metabolism, and drug delivery systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信