Lung versus gut exposure to air pollution particles differentially affect metabolic health in mice.

IF 7.2 1区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Angela J T Bosch, Theresa V Rohm, Shefaa AlAsfoor, Andy J Y Low, Lena Keller, Zora Baumann, Neena Parayil, Marc Stawiski, Leila Rachid, Thomas Dervos, Sandra Mitrovic, Daniel T Meier, Claudia Cavelti-Weder
{"title":"Lung versus gut exposure to air pollution particles differentially affect metabolic health in mice.","authors":"Angela J T Bosch,&nbsp;Theresa V Rohm,&nbsp;Shefaa AlAsfoor,&nbsp;Andy J Y Low,&nbsp;Lena Keller,&nbsp;Zora Baumann,&nbsp;Neena Parayil,&nbsp;Marc Stawiski,&nbsp;Leila Rachid,&nbsp;Thomas Dervos,&nbsp;Sandra Mitrovic,&nbsp;Daniel T Meier,&nbsp;Claudia Cavelti-Weder","doi":"10.1186/s12989-023-00518-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Air pollution has emerged as an unexpected risk factor for diabetes. However, the mechanism behind remains ill-defined. So far, the lung has been considered as the main target organ of air pollution. In contrast, the gut has received little scientific attention. Since air pollution particles can reach the gut after mucociliary clearance from the lungs and through contaminated food, our aim was to assess whether exposure deposition of air pollution particles in the lung or the gut drive metabolic dysfunction in mice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To study the effects of gut versus lung exposure, we exposed mice on standard diet to diesel exhaust particles (DEP; NIST 1650b), particulate matter (PM; NIST 1649b) or phosphate-buffered saline by either intratracheal instillation (30 µg 2 days/week) or gavage (12 µg 5 days/week) over at least 3 months (total dose of 60 µg/week for both administration routes, equivalent to a daily inhalation exposure in humans of 160 µg/m<sup>3</sup> PM<sub>2.5</sub>) and monitored metabolic parameters and tissue changes. Additionally, we tested the impact of the exposure route in a \"prestressed\" condition (high-fat diet (HFD) and streptozotocin (STZ)).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mice on standard diet exposed to particulate air pollutants by intratracheal instillation developed lung inflammation. While both lung and gut exposure resulted in increased liver lipids, glucose intolerance and impaired insulin secretion was only observed in mice exposed to particles by gavage. Gavage with DEP created an inflammatory milieu in the gut as shown by up-regulated gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and monocyte/macrophage markers. In contrast, liver and adipose inflammation markers were not increased. Beta-cell secretory capacity was impaired on a functional level, most likely induced by the inflammatory milieu in the gut, and not due to beta-cell loss. The differential metabolic effects of lung and gut exposures were confirmed in a \"prestressed\" HFD/STZ model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that separate lung and gut exposures to air pollution particles lead to distinct metabolic outcomes in mice. Both exposure routes elevate liver lipids, while gut exposure to particulate air pollutants specifically impairs beta-cell secretory capacity, potentially instigated by an inflammatory milieu in the gut.</p>","PeriodicalId":19847,"journal":{"name":"Particle and Fibre Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9996885/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Particle and Fibre Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-023-00518-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Air pollution has emerged as an unexpected risk factor for diabetes. However, the mechanism behind remains ill-defined. So far, the lung has been considered as the main target organ of air pollution. In contrast, the gut has received little scientific attention. Since air pollution particles can reach the gut after mucociliary clearance from the lungs and through contaminated food, our aim was to assess whether exposure deposition of air pollution particles in the lung or the gut drive metabolic dysfunction in mice.

Methods: To study the effects of gut versus lung exposure, we exposed mice on standard diet to diesel exhaust particles (DEP; NIST 1650b), particulate matter (PM; NIST 1649b) or phosphate-buffered saline by either intratracheal instillation (30 µg 2 days/week) or gavage (12 µg 5 days/week) over at least 3 months (total dose of 60 µg/week for both administration routes, equivalent to a daily inhalation exposure in humans of 160 µg/m3 PM2.5) and monitored metabolic parameters and tissue changes. Additionally, we tested the impact of the exposure route in a "prestressed" condition (high-fat diet (HFD) and streptozotocin (STZ)).

Results: Mice on standard diet exposed to particulate air pollutants by intratracheal instillation developed lung inflammation. While both lung and gut exposure resulted in increased liver lipids, glucose intolerance and impaired insulin secretion was only observed in mice exposed to particles by gavage. Gavage with DEP created an inflammatory milieu in the gut as shown by up-regulated gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and monocyte/macrophage markers. In contrast, liver and adipose inflammation markers were not increased. Beta-cell secretory capacity was impaired on a functional level, most likely induced by the inflammatory milieu in the gut, and not due to beta-cell loss. The differential metabolic effects of lung and gut exposures were confirmed in a "prestressed" HFD/STZ model.

Conclusions: We conclude that separate lung and gut exposures to air pollution particles lead to distinct metabolic outcomes in mice. Both exposure routes elevate liver lipids, while gut exposure to particulate air pollutants specifically impairs beta-cell secretory capacity, potentially instigated by an inflammatory milieu in the gut.

肺和肠道暴露于空气污染颗粒对小鼠代谢健康的影响不同。
背景:空气污染已成为糖尿病的一个意想不到的危险因素。然而,背后的机制仍然不明确。到目前为止,肺一直被认为是空气污染的主要靶器官。相比之下,肠道却很少受到科学的关注。由于空气污染颗粒可以通过肺部粘膜纤毛清除并通过受污染的食物到达肠道,因此我们的目的是评估空气污染颗粒在肺部或肠道中的暴露沉积是否会导致小鼠的代谢功能障碍。方法:为了研究肠道对肺暴露的影响,我们将标准饮食中的小鼠暴露于柴油废气颗粒(DEP;NIST 1650b),颗粒物(PM;NIST 1649b)或磷酸盐缓冲盐水,通过气管内滴注(30µg 2天/周)或灌胃(12µg 5天/周)至少3个月(两种给药途径的总剂量为60µg/周,相当于人体每日吸入160µg/m3 PM2.5),并监测代谢参数和组织变化。此外,我们测试了暴露途径在“预应力”条件下(高脂肪饮食(HFD)和链脲佐菌素(STZ))的影响。结果:标准饮食小鼠经气管内灌注暴露于空气微粒污染物后,出现肺部炎症。虽然肺部和肠道暴露均导致肝脏脂质升高,但仅在通过灌胃暴露于颗粒的小鼠中观察到葡萄糖耐受不良和胰岛素分泌受损。从促炎细胞因子和单核/巨噬细胞标记物的基因表达上调可以看出,DEP灌胃在肠道中创造了炎症环境。相比之下,肝脏和脂肪炎症标志物没有增加。β细胞分泌能力在功能水平上受损,很可能是由肠道炎症环境引起的,而不是由于β细胞的损失。在“预应力”HFD/STZ模型中,肺部和肠道暴露的差异代谢效应得到了证实。结论:我们得出的结论是,小鼠的肺部和肠道分别暴露于空气污染颗粒会导致不同的代谢结果。这两种暴露途径都会提高肝脏脂质,而肠道暴露于颗粒空气污染物中会特异性地损害β细胞的分泌能力,这可能是由肠道炎症环境引起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Particle and Fibre Toxicology is an online journal that is open access and peer-reviewed. It covers a range of disciplines such as material science, biomaterials, and nanomedicine, focusing on the toxicological effects of particles and fibres. The journal serves as a platform for scientific debate and communication among toxicologists and scientists from different fields who work with particle and fibre materials. The main objective of the journal is to deepen our understanding of the physico-chemical properties of particles, their potential for human exposure, and the resulting biological effects. It also addresses regulatory issues related to particle exposure in workplaces and the general environment. Moreover, the journal recognizes that there are various situations where particles can pose a toxicological threat, such as the use of old materials in new applications or the introduction of new materials altogether. By encompassing all these disciplines, Particle and Fibre Toxicology provides a comprehensive source for research in this field.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信