Diagnostic accuracy of the Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory (CASI-4R) substance use subscale in detecting substance use disorders in youth.

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Angelina Pei-Tzu Tsai, Eric A Youngstrom, Kenneth D Gadow, Sarah M Horwitz, Mary A Fristad, Stacey B Daughters, Andrea S Young, L Eugene Arnold, Boris Birmaher, Stephanie Salcedo, The Lams Group, Robert L Findling
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of the Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory (CASI-4R) substance use subscale in detecting substance use disorders in youth.","authors":"Angelina Pei-Tzu Tsai,&nbsp;Eric A Youngstrom,&nbsp;Kenneth D Gadow,&nbsp;Sarah M Horwitz,&nbsp;Mary A Fristad,&nbsp;Stacey B Daughters,&nbsp;Andrea S Young,&nbsp;L Eugene Arnold,&nbsp;Boris Birmaher,&nbsp;Stephanie Salcedo,&nbsp;The Lams Group,&nbsp;Robert L Findling","doi":"10.1037/pas0001182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying substance use disorders (SUDs) early and accurately improves case formulation and treatment. Previous studies have investigated validity and reliability of the Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory (CASI) for anxiety, mood, and behavior problems. The present study's aim was to test if the embedded CASI Substance Use (SU) subscale can discriminate adolescents and young adults (AYA) with and without a SUD diagnosis accurately enough to justify clinical application within an evidence-based assessment framework. <i>N</i> = 479 outpatient AYA (age 14-21) and their caregivers completed <i>K-SADS-PLW</i> semistructured diagnostic interviews; caregivers completed the CASI and adolescents completed a parallel version, the Youth (self-report) Inventory (YI). <i>K-SADS-PLW</i> indicated that 33 youth met <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition</i> criteria for SUDs. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses found that both CASI and YI Substance Use subscale scores significantly identified K-SADS-diagnosed SUDs in AYA: Caregiver area under curve (AUC) = .91, <i>p</i> < .0005; YI(AUC) = .90, <i>p</i> < .0005. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between informants. Both subscales showed diagnostic and clinical utility in identifying AYA SUDs in outpatient mental health settings. Findings suggest that the CASI-4R subscale could be a helpful screening instrument for AYA SUDs. A case vignette illustrates the clinical application of study findings. Future research should examine rapport as a moderator of reporting accuracy, and replicate use of these measures under varying clinical scenarios. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"35 2","pages":"178-187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001182","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying substance use disorders (SUDs) early and accurately improves case formulation and treatment. Previous studies have investigated validity and reliability of the Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory (CASI) for anxiety, mood, and behavior problems. The present study's aim was to test if the embedded CASI Substance Use (SU) subscale can discriminate adolescents and young adults (AYA) with and without a SUD diagnosis accurately enough to justify clinical application within an evidence-based assessment framework. N = 479 outpatient AYA (age 14-21) and their caregivers completed K-SADS-PLW semistructured diagnostic interviews; caregivers completed the CASI and adolescents completed a parallel version, the Youth (self-report) Inventory (YI). K-SADS-PLW indicated that 33 youth met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for SUDs. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses found that both CASI and YI Substance Use subscale scores significantly identified K-SADS-diagnosed SUDs in AYA: Caregiver area under curve (AUC) = .91, p < .0005; YI(AUC) = .90, p < .0005. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between informants. Both subscales showed diagnostic and clinical utility in identifying AYA SUDs in outpatient mental health settings. Findings suggest that the CASI-4R subscale could be a helpful screening instrument for AYA SUDs. A case vignette illustrates the clinical application of study findings. Future research should examine rapport as a moderator of reporting accuracy, and replicate use of these measures under varying clinical scenarios. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

儿童与青少年症状量表(CASI-4R)物质使用量表检测青少年物质使用障碍的诊断准确性。
早期和准确地识别物质使用障碍(sud)可以改善病例制定和治疗。先前的研究已经调查了儿童和青少年症状量表(CASI)在焦虑、情绪和行为问题上的效度和信度。本研究的目的是测试嵌入的CASI物质使用(SU)子量表是否能够准确地区分有或没有SUD诊断的青少年和年轻人(AYA),以证明在循证评估框架内的临床应用是合理的。N = 479名门诊AYA(14-21岁)及其护理人员完成了K-SADS-PLW半结构化诊断访谈;照顾者完成CASI,青少年完成一个平行版本,青年(自我报告)量表(YI)。K-SADS-PLW显示33名青少年符合精神障碍诊断与统计手册第四版的标准。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析发现,CASI和YI物质使用量表得分均显著识别出AYA中k - sads诊断的SUDs:护理者曲线下面积(AUC) = 0.91, p < 0.0005;YI(AUC) = .90, p < .0005。在被检举人之间的诊断准确性没有显著差异。两个分量表在门诊精神卫生设置中都显示出诊断和临床效用。研究结果提示CASI-4R量表可作为AYA sud的有效筛选工具。一个案例说明了研究结果的临床应用。未来的研究应该检查融洽关系作为报告准确性的调节因素,并在不同的临床情况下重复使用这些措施。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信