Battling Bias in Primary Care Encounters: Informatics Designs to Support Clinicians.

Lisa G Dirks, Erin Beneteau, Janice Sabin, Wanda Pratt, Cezanne Lane, Emily Bascom, Reggie Casanova-Perez, Naba Rizvi, Nadir Weibel, Andrea L Hartzler
{"title":"Battling Bias in Primary Care Encounters: Informatics Designs to Support Clinicians.","authors":"Lisa G Dirks,&nbsp;Erin Beneteau,&nbsp;Janice Sabin,&nbsp;Wanda Pratt,&nbsp;Cezanne Lane,&nbsp;Emily Bascom,&nbsp;Reggie Casanova-Perez,&nbsp;Naba Rizvi,&nbsp;Nadir Weibel,&nbsp;Andrea L Hartzler","doi":"10.1145/3491101.3519825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although clinical training in implicit bias is essential for healthcare equity, major gaps remain both for effective educational strategies and for tools to help identify implicit bias. To understand the perspectives of clinicians on the design of these needed strategies and tools, we conducted 21 semi-structured interviews with primary care clinicians about their perspectives and design recommendations for tools to improve patient-centered communication and to help mitigate implicit bias. Participants generated three types of solutions to improve communication and raise awareness of implicit bias: digital nudges, guided reflection, and data-driven feedback. Given the nuance of implicit bias communication feedback, these findings illustrate innovative design directions for communication training strategies that clinicians may find acceptable. Improving communication skills through individual feedback designed by clinicians for clinicians has the potential to improve healthcare equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":73006,"journal":{"name":"Extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference","volume":"2022 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9128862/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Although clinical training in implicit bias is essential for healthcare equity, major gaps remain both for effective educational strategies and for tools to help identify implicit bias. To understand the perspectives of clinicians on the design of these needed strategies and tools, we conducted 21 semi-structured interviews with primary care clinicians about their perspectives and design recommendations for tools to improve patient-centered communication and to help mitigate implicit bias. Participants generated three types of solutions to improve communication and raise awareness of implicit bias: digital nudges, guided reflection, and data-driven feedback. Given the nuance of implicit bias communication feedback, these findings illustrate innovative design directions for communication training strategies that clinicians may find acceptable. Improving communication skills through individual feedback designed by clinicians for clinicians has the potential to improve healthcare equity.

在初级保健遭遇中对抗偏见:支持临床医生的信息学设计。
尽管内隐偏见的临床培训对医疗公平至关重要,但有效的教育策略和帮助识别内隐偏见的工具仍然存在重大差距。为了了解临床医生对设计这些所需策略和工具的观点,我们对初级保健临床医生进行了21次半结构化访谈,了解他们的观点和设计工具的建议,以改善以患者为中心的沟通,并帮助减轻内隐偏见。与会者提出了三种解决方案,以改善沟通和提高对隐性偏见的认识:数字推动、引导反思和数据驱动反馈。鉴于内隐偏见沟通反馈的细微差别,这些发现说明了沟通培训策略的创新设计方向,临床医生可能会发现可接受的。通过临床医生为临床医生设计的个人反馈来提高沟通技巧,有可能改善医疗公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信