Use of Censored Multiple Regression to Interpret Temporal Environmental Data and Assess Remedy Progress

IF 2 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Groundwater Pub Date : 2023-04-07 DOI:10.1111/gwat.13315
Erica DiFilippo, Matt Tonkin, William Huber
{"title":"Use of Censored Multiple Regression to Interpret Temporal Environmental Data and Assess Remedy Progress","authors":"Erica DiFilippo,&nbsp;Matt Tonkin,&nbsp;William Huber","doi":"10.1111/gwat.13315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many methods to evaluate temporal trends in monitoring data focus on univariate techniques that account for changes in the response variable (e.g., concentration) by means of a single variable, namely time. When predictable site-specific factors, such as groundwater-surface water interactions, are associated with or may cause concentration changes, univariate methods may be insufficient for characterizing, estimating, and forecasting temporal trends. Multiple regression methods can incorporate additional explanatory variables, thereby minimizing the amount of unexplained variability that is relegated to the “error” term. However, the presence of sample results that are below laboratory reporting limits (i.e., censored) prohibits the direct application of the standard least-squares method for multiple regression. Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) for multiple regression analysis can enhance temporal trend analysis in the presence of censored response data and improve characterizing, estimating, and forecasting of temporal trends. Multiple regression using MLE (or censored multiple regression) was demonstrated at the U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site where analyte concentrations in groundwater samples are negatively correlated with the stage of the nearby Columbia River. Incorporating a time-lagged stage variable in the regression analysis of these data provides more reliable estimates of future concentrations, reducing the uncertainty in evaluating the progress of remediation toward remedial action objectives. Censored multiple regression can identify significant changes over time; project when maxima and minima of interest are likely to occur; estimate average values and their confidence limits over time periods relevant to regulatory compliance; and thereby improve the management of remedial action monitoring programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"61 6","pages":"846-864"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Groundwater","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwat.13315","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many methods to evaluate temporal trends in monitoring data focus on univariate techniques that account for changes in the response variable (e.g., concentration) by means of a single variable, namely time. When predictable site-specific factors, such as groundwater-surface water interactions, are associated with or may cause concentration changes, univariate methods may be insufficient for characterizing, estimating, and forecasting temporal trends. Multiple regression methods can incorporate additional explanatory variables, thereby minimizing the amount of unexplained variability that is relegated to the “error” term. However, the presence of sample results that are below laboratory reporting limits (i.e., censored) prohibits the direct application of the standard least-squares method for multiple regression. Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) for multiple regression analysis can enhance temporal trend analysis in the presence of censored response data and improve characterizing, estimating, and forecasting of temporal trends. Multiple regression using MLE (or censored multiple regression) was demonstrated at the U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site where analyte concentrations in groundwater samples are negatively correlated with the stage of the nearby Columbia River. Incorporating a time-lagged stage variable in the regression analysis of these data provides more reliable estimates of future concentrations, reducing the uncertainty in evaluating the progress of remediation toward remedial action objectives. Censored multiple regression can identify significant changes over time; project when maxima and minima of interest are likely to occur; estimate average values and their confidence limits over time periods relevant to regulatory compliance; and thereby improve the management of remedial action monitoring programs.

Abstract Image

使用删节多元回归解释时间环境数据和评估补救进展。
许多评估监测数据中时间趋势的方法侧重于单变量技术,该技术通过单个变量(即时间)来解释响应变量(如浓度)的变化。当可预测的特定地点因素,如地下水-地表水相互作用,与浓度变化有关或可能导致浓度变化时,单变量方法可能不足以表征、估计和预测时间趋势。多元回归方法可以包含额外的解释变量,从而最大限度地减少归为“误差”项的无法解释的可变性。然而,样本结果低于实验室报告限制(即审查),禁止直接应用标准最小二乘法进行多元回归。多元回归分析的最大似然估计(MLE)可以在存在截尾响应数据的情况下增强时间趋势分析,并改进时间趋势的表征、估计和预测。使用MLE(或截尾多元回归)的多元回归在美国能源部汉福德现场进行了演示,地下水样本中的分析物浓度与附近哥伦比亚河的水位呈负相关。在这些数据的回归分析中加入时滞阶段变量,可以更可靠地估计未来的浓度,减少评估补救行动目标进展的不确定性。截尾多元回归可以识别出随时间的显著变化;当感兴趣的最大值和最小值可能发生时进行项目;估计与监管合规性相关的时间段内的平均值及其置信限;从而改进补救措施监控程序的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Groundwater
Groundwater 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Ground Water is the leading international journal focused exclusively on ground water. Since 1963, Ground Water has published a dynamic mix of papers on topics related to ground water including ground water flow and well hydraulics, hydrogeochemistry and contaminant hydrogeology, application of geophysics, groundwater management and policy, and history of ground water hydrology. This is the journal you can count on to bring you the practical applications in ground water hydrology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信