Does "Jamal" receive a harsher sentence than "James"? First-name bias in the criminal sentencing of Black men.

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Dushiyanthini Toni Kenthirarajah, Nicholas P Camp, Gregory M Walton, Aaron C Kay, Geoffrey L Cohen
{"title":"Does \"Jamal\" receive a harsher sentence than \"James\"? First-name bias in the criminal sentencing of Black men.","authors":"Dushiyanthini Toni Kenthirarajah,&nbsp;Nicholas P Camp,&nbsp;Gregory M Walton,&nbsp;Aaron C Kay,&nbsp;Geoffrey L Cohen","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Using archival and experimental methods, we tested the role that racial associations of first names play in criminal sentencing.</p><p><strong>Hypotheses: </strong>We hypothesized that Black defendants with more stereotypically Black names (e.g., Jamal) would receive more punitive sentences than Black defendants with more stereotypically White names (e.g., James).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In an archival study, we obtained a random sample of 296 real-world records of Black male prison inmates in Florida and asked participants to rate the extent to which each inmate's first name was stereotypically Black or stereotypically White. We then tested the extent to which racial stereotypicality was associated with sentence length, controlling for relevant legal features of each case (e.g., criminal record, severity of convicted offenses). In a follow-up experiment, participant judges assigned sentences in cases in which the Black male defendant was randomly assigned a more stereotypically Black or White name from our archival study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Controlling for a wide array of factors-including criminal record-we found that inmates with more stereotypically Black versus White first names received longer sentences β = 0.09, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) [0.01, 0.16]: 409 days longer for names 1 standard deviation above versus below the mean on racial stereotypicality. In our experiment, participant judges recommended significantly longer sentences to Black inmates with more stereotypically Black names above and beyond the severity of the charges or their criminal history, β = 0.07, 95% CI [0.02, 0.13].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results identify how racial associations with first names can bias consequential sentencing decisions despite the impartial aims of the legal system. More broadly, our findings illustrate how racial biases manifest in distinctions made among members of historically marginalized groups, not just between members of different groups. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48230,"journal":{"name":"Law and Human Behavior","volume":"47 1","pages":"169-181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000498","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Using archival and experimental methods, we tested the role that racial associations of first names play in criminal sentencing.

Hypotheses: We hypothesized that Black defendants with more stereotypically Black names (e.g., Jamal) would receive more punitive sentences than Black defendants with more stereotypically White names (e.g., James).

Method: In an archival study, we obtained a random sample of 296 real-world records of Black male prison inmates in Florida and asked participants to rate the extent to which each inmate's first name was stereotypically Black or stereotypically White. We then tested the extent to which racial stereotypicality was associated with sentence length, controlling for relevant legal features of each case (e.g., criminal record, severity of convicted offenses). In a follow-up experiment, participant judges assigned sentences in cases in which the Black male defendant was randomly assigned a more stereotypically Black or White name from our archival study.

Results: Controlling for a wide array of factors-including criminal record-we found that inmates with more stereotypically Black versus White first names received longer sentences β = 0.09, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) [0.01, 0.16]: 409 days longer for names 1 standard deviation above versus below the mean on racial stereotypicality. In our experiment, participant judges recommended significantly longer sentences to Black inmates with more stereotypically Black names above and beyond the severity of the charges or their criminal history, β = 0.07, 95% CI [0.02, 0.13].

Conclusions: Our results identify how racial associations with first names can bias consequential sentencing decisions despite the impartial aims of the legal system. More broadly, our findings illustrate how racial biases manifest in distinctions made among members of historically marginalized groups, not just between members of different groups. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

"贾马尔"会比"詹姆斯"受到更严厉的判决吗?黑人刑事判决中的名字偏见。
目的:采用文献资料法和实验方法,考察人名的种族联想在刑事量刑中的作用。假设:我们假设,拥有更典型的黑人名字的黑人被告(例如,贾马尔)会比拥有更典型的白人名字的黑人被告(例如,詹姆斯)受到更多的惩罚。方法:在一项档案研究中,我们随机抽取了296名佛罗里达州黑人男性监狱囚犯的真实记录,并要求参与者评估每个囚犯的名字在多大程度上是典型的黑人或典型的白人。然后,我们测试了种族刻板印象与刑期长短的关系程度,控制了每个案件的相关法律特征(例如,犯罪记录,定罪罪行的严重程度)。在后续的实验中,参与审判的法官在案件中分配判决,在这些案件中,黑人男性被告被随机分配了一个更刻板的黑人或白人名字,这些名字来自我们的档案研究。结果:在控制了包括犯罪记录在内的一系列因素后,我们发现,名字更典型的黑人囚犯比名字更典型的白人囚犯刑期更长。β = 0.09, 95%置信区间(95% CI)[0.01, 0.16]:名字长409天,比种族刻板印象的平均值高出1个标准差,比平均值低1个标准差。在我们的实验中,参与审判的法官建议对黑人囚犯进行更长的刑期,这些囚犯的名字比指控的严重程度或犯罪历史更典型,β = 0.07, 95% CI[0.02, 0.13]。结论:我们的研究结果表明,尽管法律制度的目标是公正的,但与名字有关的种族联系如何影响相应的量刑决定。更广泛地说,我们的发现说明了种族偏见是如何在历史上被边缘化的群体成员之间表现出来的,而不仅仅是在不同群体的成员之间。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Law and Human Behavior, the official journal of the American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association, is a multidisciplinary forum for the publication of articles and discussions of issues arising out of the relationships between human behavior and the law, our legal system, and the legal process. This journal publishes original research, reviews of past research, and theoretical studies from professionals in criminal justice, law, psychology, sociology, psychiatry, political science, education, communication, and other areas germane to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信