Implementing brief and low-intensity psychological interventions for children and young people with internalizing disorders: a rapid realist review.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Anna Roach, Sophie Cullinan, Roz Shafran, Isobel Heyman, Sophie Bennett
{"title":"Implementing brief and low-intensity psychological interventions for children and young people with internalizing disorders: a rapid realist review.","authors":"Anna Roach,&nbsp;Sophie Cullinan,&nbsp;Roz Shafran,&nbsp;Isobel Heyman,&nbsp;Sophie Bennett","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldad001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many children fail to receive the mental health treatments they need, despite strong evidence demonstrating efficacy of brief and low-intensity psychological interventions. This review identifies the barriers and facilitators to their implementation.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>PsycInfo, EMBASE and Medline were searched and a systematic approach to data extraction using Normalization Process Theory highlighted key mechanisms and contextual factors.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>Ten interventions from 9 papers, including 371 young people, were included. Studies identified organizational demands, lack of implementation strategy and stigma as barriers to implementation, and clear training and plans for implementation as facilitators.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>No standardized implementation outcomes were used across papers so meta-analysis was not possible.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>Barriers and facilitators have been clearly identified across different settings.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>Longitudinal studies can identify methods and processes for enhancing long-term implementation and considers ways to monitor and evaluate uptake into routine practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"145 1","pages":"120-131"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10075242/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldad001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Many children fail to receive the mental health treatments they need, despite strong evidence demonstrating efficacy of brief and low-intensity psychological interventions. This review identifies the barriers and facilitators to their implementation.

Sources of data: PsycInfo, EMBASE and Medline were searched and a systematic approach to data extraction using Normalization Process Theory highlighted key mechanisms and contextual factors.

Areas of agreement: Ten interventions from 9 papers, including 371 young people, were included. Studies identified organizational demands, lack of implementation strategy and stigma as barriers to implementation, and clear training and plans for implementation as facilitators.

Areas of controversy: No standardized implementation outcomes were used across papers so meta-analysis was not possible.

Growing points: Barriers and facilitators have been clearly identified across different settings.

Areas timely for developing research: Longitudinal studies can identify methods and processes for enhancing long-term implementation and considers ways to monitor and evaluate uptake into routine practice.

Abstract Image

对患有内化障碍的儿童和青少年实施简短和低强度的心理干预:快速现实主义回顾。
导言:尽管有强有力的证据表明短暂和低强度的心理干预有效,但许多儿童未能得到所需的心理健康治疗。本审查确定了实施这些措施的障碍和促进因素。数据来源:检索PsycInfo, EMBASE和Medline,使用规范化过程理论的系统方法提取数据,突出了关键机制和上下文因素。一致领域:包括9篇论文的10项干预措施,包括371名年轻人。研究发现,组织需求、缺乏实施战略和耻辱感是实施的障碍,明确的培训和实施计划是促进因素。争议领域:没有在所有论文中使用标准化的实施结果,因此不可能进行meta分析。成长点:在不同的环境中,障碍和促进因素已经被清楚地识别出来。及时开展研究的领域:纵向研究可以确定加强长期实施的方法和过程,并考虑如何监测和评估纳入日常实践的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British medical bulletin
British medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.50%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: British Medical Bulletin is a multidisciplinary publication, which comprises high quality reviews aimed at generalist physicians, junior doctors, and medical students in both developed and developing countries. Its key aims are to provide interpretations of growing points in medicine by trusted experts in the field, and to assist practitioners in incorporating not just evidence but new conceptual ways of thinking into their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信