Quality-Adjusted Life Year Proxies for Caries in Primary Dentition: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

IF 2.2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
JDR Clinical & Translational Research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-15 DOI:10.1177/23800844221149337
T K Lin, D E Arriola Zarate, N Iribarren, H Lindau, F Ramos-Gomez, S A Gansky
{"title":"Quality-Adjusted Life Year Proxies for Caries in Primary Dentition: A Discrete Choice Experiment.","authors":"T K Lin, D E Arriola Zarate, N Iribarren, H Lindau, F Ramos-Gomez, S A Gansky","doi":"10.1177/23800844221149337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cost-utility analysis (CUA)-a method to evaluate intervention cost-effectiveness-transforms benefits of alternatives into a measure of quantity and quality of life, such as quality-adjusted life year (QALY), to enable comparison across heterogeneous programs. Measurement challenges prevent directly estimating utilities and calculating QALYs for caries in primary dentition. Proxy disease QALYs are often used as a substitute; however, there lacks quantitative evidence that these proxy diseases are comparable to caries.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To employ a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to quantitatively determine the most comparable proxy disease for different levels of caries in primary dentition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional DCE survey was administered to respondents (<i>N</i> = 461) who resided in California, were aged ≥18 y, and were primary caretakers for ≥1 child aged 3 to 12 y. Four attributes were included: pain level, disease duration, treatment cost, and family life impacts. Mixed effects logistic regression and conditional logistic regression were used to analyze the survey data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents from the overall sample preferred no pain over mild (odds ratio [OR] = 0.50, <i>P</i> < 0.05), moderate (OR = 0.57, <i>P</i> < 0.05), and severe pain (OR = 0.48, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Acute gastritis (OR = 0.44, <i>P</i> < 0.05), chronic gastritis (OR = 0.31, <i>P</i> < 0.01), and cold sore (OR = 0.38, <i>P</i> < 0.05) were less preferred than stage 1 caries. Acute tonsilitis (OR = 0.43, <i>P</i> < 0.05), acute gastritis (OR = 0.38, <i>P</i> < 0.05), chronic gastritis (OR = 0.26, <i>P</i> < 0.01), and cold sore (OR = 0.33, <i>P</i> < 0.01) were less preferred than stage 2 caries. Chronic gastritis (OR = 0.42,<i>P</i> < 0.05) was less preferred than stage 4 caries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Parents viewed the characteristics of many diseases with similar QALYs differently. Findings suggest that otitis media and its QALY-as commonly used in CUAs-may be a suitable proxy disease and substitute. However, other disease states with slightly different QALYs may be suitable. As such, the recommendation is to consider a range of proxy diseases and their QALYs when conducting a CUA for child caries interventions.</p><p><strong>Knowledge transfer statement: </strong>This study reviews and systematically compares pediatric diseases that are comparable to caries in primary dentition. The findings may inform future research using cost-utility analysis to examine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of interventions to prevent and treat caries as compared with an alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":14783,"journal":{"name":"JDR Clinical & Translational Research","volume":" ","pages":"85-94"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10850881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDR Clinical & Translational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23800844221149337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cost-utility analysis (CUA)-a method to evaluate intervention cost-effectiveness-transforms benefits of alternatives into a measure of quantity and quality of life, such as quality-adjusted life year (QALY), to enable comparison across heterogeneous programs. Measurement challenges prevent directly estimating utilities and calculating QALYs for caries in primary dentition. Proxy disease QALYs are often used as a substitute; however, there lacks quantitative evidence that these proxy diseases are comparable to caries.

Objective: To employ a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to quantitatively determine the most comparable proxy disease for different levels of caries in primary dentition.

Methods: A cross-sectional DCE survey was administered to respondents (N = 461) who resided in California, were aged ≥18 y, and were primary caretakers for ≥1 child aged 3 to 12 y. Four attributes were included: pain level, disease duration, treatment cost, and family life impacts. Mixed effects logistic regression and conditional logistic regression were used to analyze the survey data.

Results: Respondents from the overall sample preferred no pain over mild (odds ratio [OR] = 0.50, P < 0.05), moderate (OR = 0.57, P < 0.05), and severe pain (OR = 0.48, P < 0.05). Acute gastritis (OR = 0.44, P < 0.05), chronic gastritis (OR = 0.31, P < 0.01), and cold sore (OR = 0.38, P < 0.05) were less preferred than stage 1 caries. Acute tonsilitis (OR = 0.43, P < 0.05), acute gastritis (OR = 0.38, P < 0.05), chronic gastritis (OR = 0.26, P < 0.01), and cold sore (OR = 0.33, P < 0.01) were less preferred than stage 2 caries. Chronic gastritis (OR = 0.42,P < 0.05) was less preferred than stage 4 caries.

Conclusions: Parents viewed the characteristics of many diseases with similar QALYs differently. Findings suggest that otitis media and its QALY-as commonly used in CUAs-may be a suitable proxy disease and substitute. However, other disease states with slightly different QALYs may be suitable. As such, the recommendation is to consider a range of proxy diseases and their QALYs when conducting a CUA for child caries interventions.

Knowledge transfer statement: This study reviews and systematically compares pediatric diseases that are comparable to caries in primary dentition. The findings may inform future research using cost-utility analysis to examine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of interventions to prevent and treat caries as compared with an alternative.

龋齿的质量调整生命年替代物:离散选择实验
导言:成本效用分析(CUA)是一种评估干预措施成本效益的方法,它将替代方案的效益转化为生活数量和质量的衡量标准,如质量调整生命年(QALY),以便在不同方案之间进行比较。测量方面的挑战阻碍了直接估算效用和计算基牙龋齿的 QALY。替代疾病的 QALY 通常被用作替代品,但缺乏定量证据表明这些替代疾病与龋病具有可比性:目的:采用离散选择实验(DCE)定量确定基牙不同龋坏程度的最可比替代疾病:对居住在加利福尼亚州、年龄≥18 岁、主要照顾≥1 名 3 至 12 岁儿童的受访者(N = 461)进行了一项横断面 DCE 调查,其中包括四个属性:疼痛程度、病程、治疗费用和对家庭生活的影响。调查数据采用混合效应逻辑回归和条件逻辑回归进行分析:结果:总体样本中的受访者倾向于选择无痛,而不是轻度疼痛(几率比 [OR] = 0.50,P < 0.05)、中度疼痛(OR = 0.57,P < 0.05)和重度疼痛(OR = 0.48,P < 0.05)。急性胃炎(OR=0.44,P<0.05)、慢性胃炎(OR=0.31,P<0.01)和唇疱疹(OR=0.38,P<0.05)比第一期龋齿更不受欢迎。急性扁桃体炎(OR=0.43,P<0.05)、急性胃炎(OR=0.38,P<0.05)、慢性胃炎(OR=0.26,P<0.01)和唇疱疹(OR=0.33,P<0.01)比第 2 期龋齿更不受欢迎。慢性胃炎(OR = 0.42,P < 0.05)比第四期龋齿更不受欢迎:结论:家长对许多具有相似 QALYs 的疾病的特征有不同的看法。研究结果表明,中耳炎及其 QALY(通常用于 CUAs)可能是一种合适的替代疾病和替代品。然而,其他疾病状态的 QALY 也可能略有不同。因此,建议在对儿童龋齿干预进行CUA时考虑一系列替代疾病及其QALY:本研究回顾并系统比较了与原牙龋齿具有可比性的儿科疾病。研究结果可为今后的研究提供参考,利用成本效用分析法来检验预防和治疗龋齿的干预措施与替代方案相比的增量成本效益比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JDR Clinical & Translational Research
JDR Clinical & Translational Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: JDR Clinical & Translational Research seeks to publish the highest quality research articles on clinical and translational research including all of the dental specialties and implantology. Examples include behavioral sciences, cariology, oral & pharyngeal cancer, disease diagnostics, evidence based health care delivery, human genetics, health services research, periodontal diseases, oral medicine, radiology, and pathology. The JDR Clinical & Translational Research expands on its research content by including high-impact health care and global oral health policy statements and systematic reviews of clinical concepts affecting clinical practice. Unique to the JDR Clinical & Translational Research are advances in clinical and translational medicine articles created to focus on research with an immediate potential to affect clinical therapy outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信