Substance use disorders and social determinants of health from electronic medical records obtained during Kentucky's “triple wave”

IF 3.3 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Chris Delcher , Daniel R. Harris , Nicholas Anthony , William W. Stoops , Katherine Thompson , Dana Quesinberry
{"title":"Substance use disorders and social determinants of health from electronic medical records obtained during Kentucky's “triple wave”","authors":"Chris Delcher ,&nbsp;Daniel R. Harris ,&nbsp;Nicholas Anthony ,&nbsp;William W. Stoops ,&nbsp;Katherine Thompson ,&nbsp;Dana Quesinberry","doi":"10.1016/j.pbb.2022.173495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Social determinants of health (SDOH) play a critical role in the risk of harmful drug use. Examining SDOH as a means of differentiating populations with multiple co-occurring substance use disorders (SUDs) is particularly salient in the era of prevalent opioid and stimulant use known as the “Third Wave”. This study uses </span>electronic medical records (EMRs) from a safety net hospital system from 14,032 patients in Kentucky from 2017 to 2019 in order to 1) define three types of SUD cohorts with shared/unique risk factors, 2) identify patients with unstable housing using novel methods for EMRs and 3) link patients to their residential neighborhood to obtain quantitative perspective on social vulnerability. We identified patients in three cohorts with statistically significant unique risk factors that included race, biological sex, insurance type, smoking status, and urban/rural residential location. Adjusting for these variables, we found a statistically significant, increasing risk gradient for patients experiencing unstable housing by cohort type: opioid-only (</span><em>n</em> = 7385, reference), stimulant-only (<em>n</em> = 4794, odds ratio (aOR) 1.86 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.66–2.09), and co-diagnosed (<em>n</em> = 1853, aOR = 2.75, 95 % CI: 2.39 to 3.16). At the neighborhood-level, we used 8 different measures of social vulnerability and found that, for the most part, increasing proportions of patients with stimulant use living in a census tract was associated with more social vulnerability. Our study identifies potentially modifiable factors that can be tailored by substance type and demonstrates robust use of EMRs to meet national goals of enhancing research on social determinants of health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19893,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 173495"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091305722001745","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Social determinants of health (SDOH) play a critical role in the risk of harmful drug use. Examining SDOH as a means of differentiating populations with multiple co-occurring substance use disorders (SUDs) is particularly salient in the era of prevalent opioid and stimulant use known as the “Third Wave”. This study uses electronic medical records (EMRs) from a safety net hospital system from 14,032 patients in Kentucky from 2017 to 2019 in order to 1) define three types of SUD cohorts with shared/unique risk factors, 2) identify patients with unstable housing using novel methods for EMRs and 3) link patients to their residential neighborhood to obtain quantitative perspective on social vulnerability. We identified patients in three cohorts with statistically significant unique risk factors that included race, biological sex, insurance type, smoking status, and urban/rural residential location. Adjusting for these variables, we found a statistically significant, increasing risk gradient for patients experiencing unstable housing by cohort type: opioid-only (n = 7385, reference), stimulant-only (n = 4794, odds ratio (aOR) 1.86 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.66–2.09), and co-diagnosed (n = 1853, aOR = 2.75, 95 % CI: 2.39 to 3.16). At the neighborhood-level, we used 8 different measures of social vulnerability and found that, for the most part, increasing proportions of patients with stimulant use living in a census tract was associated with more social vulnerability. Our study identifies potentially modifiable factors that can be tailored by substance type and demonstrates robust use of EMRs to meet national goals of enhancing research on social determinants of health.

从肯塔基州“三重浪潮”期间获得的电子医疗记录来看,物质使用障碍和健康的社会决定因素
健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)在有害药物使用风险中发挥着关键作用。在被称为“第三次浪潮”的阿片类药物和兴奋剂使用盛行的时代,将SDOH作为区分多种共同发生的物质使用障碍(sud)人群的一种手段进行检查尤为重要。本研究使用来自2017年至2019年肯塔基州安全网医院系统的14,032名患者的电子医疗记录(emr),以便1)定义具有共享/独特风险因素的三种类型的SUD队列,2)使用emr的新方法识别住房不稳定的患者,3)将患者与其居住社区联系起来,以获得社会脆弱性的定量视角。我们在三个队列中确定了具有统计学意义的独特危险因素的患者,这些因素包括种族、生物性别、保险类型、吸烟状况和城市/农村居住地点。对这些变量进行调整后,我们发现,不同队列类型的不稳定住房患者的风险梯度增加具有统计学意义:仅阿片类药物(n = 7385,参考)、仅兴奋剂(n = 4794,优势比(aOR) 1.86 95%置信区间(CI): 1.66-2.09)和合并诊断(n = 1853, aOR = 2.75, 95% CI: 2.39 - 3.16)。在社区层面,我们使用了8种不同的社会脆弱性测量方法,发现在大多数情况下,居住在人口普查区的兴奋剂使用患者比例的增加与社会脆弱性的增加有关。我们的研究确定了可以根据物质类型量身定制的潜在可修改因素,并展示了电子病历的有力使用,以实现加强健康社会决定因素研究的国家目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior publishes original reports in the areas of pharmacology and biochemistry in which the primary emphasis and theoretical context are behavioral. Contributions may involve clinical, preclinical, or basic research. Purely biochemical or toxicology studies will not be published. Papers describing the behavioral effects of novel drugs in models of psychiatric, neurological and cognitive disorders, and central pain must include a positive control unless the paper is on a disease where such a drug is not available yet. Papers focusing on physiological processes (e.g., peripheral pain mechanisms, body temperature regulation, seizure activity) are not accepted as we would like to retain the focus of Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior on behavior and its interaction with the biochemistry and neurochemistry of the central nervous system. Papers describing the effects of plant materials are generally not considered, unless the active ingredients are studied, the extraction method is well described, the doses tested are known, and clear and definite experimental evidence on the mechanism of action of the active ingredients is provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信