Randomised controlled study of two counselling models at the Swedish alcohol helpline: Effectiveness and sustainability outcomes at 12-month follow-up.

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Thi-Thuy-Dung Nguyen, Eleonor Säfsten, Filip Andersson, Maria Rosaria Galanti
{"title":"Randomised controlled study of two counselling models at the Swedish alcohol helpline: Effectiveness and sustainability outcomes at 12-month follow-up.","authors":"Thi-Thuy-Dung Nguyen,&nbsp;Eleonor Säfsten,&nbsp;Filip Andersson,&nbsp;Maria Rosaria Galanti","doi":"10.1177/14550725211007823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> This two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial explored the effectiveness of a brief counselling model compared with the usual multi-session counselling at an alcohol telephone helpline. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 320 callers who contacted the Swedish Alcohol Helpline (SAH) because of hazardous or harmful alcohol use were randomised to either brief structured intervention (self-help booklet plus one proactive call) or usual care (multi-session telephone counselling). The primary outcome was a downward shift in risk level at 12-month follow-up compared with baseline, based on self-reports. Sustained risk level reduction throughout the whole follow-up was also assessed as secondary outcome. <b>Results:</b> Both interventions were significantly associated with a shift to a lower level of risky alcohol use (75% among participants in the brief structured intervention, and 70% in the usual care group) after 12 months. There was no difference between the two interventions in the proportions changing alcohol use or sustaining risk level reduction. <b>Conclusion:</b> In the context of telephone helplines, minimal and extended interventions appear to be equally effective in promoting long-term change in alcohol use.</p>","PeriodicalId":46180,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs","volume":"39 2","pages":"163-174"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/14550725211007823","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14550725211007823","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: This two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial explored the effectiveness of a brief counselling model compared with the usual multi-session counselling at an alcohol telephone helpline. Methods: A total of 320 callers who contacted the Swedish Alcohol Helpline (SAH) because of hazardous or harmful alcohol use were randomised to either brief structured intervention (self-help booklet plus one proactive call) or usual care (multi-session telephone counselling). The primary outcome was a downward shift in risk level at 12-month follow-up compared with baseline, based on self-reports. Sustained risk level reduction throughout the whole follow-up was also assessed as secondary outcome. Results: Both interventions were significantly associated with a shift to a lower level of risky alcohol use (75% among participants in the brief structured intervention, and 70% in the usual care group) after 12 months. There was no difference between the two interventions in the proportions changing alcohol use or sustaining risk level reduction. Conclusion: In the context of telephone helplines, minimal and extended interventions appear to be equally effective in promoting long-term change in alcohol use.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

瑞典酒精求助热线两种咨询模式的随机对照研究:12个月随访的有效性和可持续性结果
目的:这项双臂平行随机对照试验探讨了一个简短的咨询模式与通常的酒精求助电话多时段咨询的有效性。方法:共有320名因危险或有害使用酒精而联系瑞典酒精求助热线(SAH)的呼救者被随机分配到简短的结构化干预(自助手册加一个主动电话)或常规护理(多时段电话咨询)。主要结果是在12个月的随访中,与基线相比,基于自我报告的风险水平下降。在整个随访过程中持续的风险水平降低也被评估为次要结果。结果:12个月后,两种干预措施都与转向较低水平的危险酒精使用显著相关(在简短结构化干预组中为75%,在常规护理组中为70%)。在改变酒精使用或维持风险水平降低的比例方面,两种干预措施之间没有差异。结论:在电话求助热线的背景下,在促进长期改变酒精使用方面,最小干预和延长干预似乎同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
36
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信