{"title":"High spin Fe(III)-doped nanostructures as T<sub>1</sub> MR imaging probes.","authors":"Mauro Botta, Carlos F G C Geraldes, Lorenzo Tei","doi":"10.1002/wnan.1858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) T<sub>1</sub> contrast agents based on Fe(III) as an alternative to Gd-based compounds have been under intense scrutiny in the last 6-8 years and a number of nanostructures have been designed and proposed for in vivo diagnostic and theranostic applications. Excluding the large family of superparamagnetic iron oxides widely used as T<sub>2</sub> -MR imaging agents that will not be covered by this review, a considerable number and type of nanoparticles (NPs) have been employed, ranging from amphiphilic polymer-based NPs, NPs containing polyphenolic binding units such as melanin-like or polycatechols, mixed metals such as Fe/Gd or Fe/Au NPs and perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions. Iron(III) exhibits several favorable magnetic properties, high biocompatibility and improved toxicity profile that place it as the paramagnetic ion of choice for the next generation of nanosized MRI and theranostic contrast agents. An analysis of the examples reported in the last decade will show the opportunities for relaxivity and MR-contrast enhancement optimization that could bring Fe(III)-doped NPs to really compete with Gd(III)-based nanosystems. This article is categorized under: Diagnostic Tools > In Vivo Nanodiagnostics and Imaging Diagnostic Tools > Diagnostic Nanodevices Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":23697,"journal":{"name":"Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology","volume":"15 2","pages":"e1858"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1858","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) T1 contrast agents based on Fe(III) as an alternative to Gd-based compounds have been under intense scrutiny in the last 6-8 years and a number of nanostructures have been designed and proposed for in vivo diagnostic and theranostic applications. Excluding the large family of superparamagnetic iron oxides widely used as T2 -MR imaging agents that will not be covered by this review, a considerable number and type of nanoparticles (NPs) have been employed, ranging from amphiphilic polymer-based NPs, NPs containing polyphenolic binding units such as melanin-like or polycatechols, mixed metals such as Fe/Gd or Fe/Au NPs and perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions. Iron(III) exhibits several favorable magnetic properties, high biocompatibility and improved toxicity profile that place it as the paramagnetic ion of choice for the next generation of nanosized MRI and theranostic contrast agents. An analysis of the examples reported in the last decade will show the opportunities for relaxivity and MR-contrast enhancement optimization that could bring Fe(III)-doped NPs to really compete with Gd(III)-based nanosystems. This article is categorized under: Diagnostic Tools > In Vivo Nanodiagnostics and Imaging Diagnostic Tools > Diagnostic Nanodevices Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease.
期刊介绍:
Nanotechnology stands as one of the pivotal scientific domains of the twenty-first century, recognized universally for its transformative potential. Within the biomedical realm, nanotechnology finds crucial applications in nanobiotechnology and nanomedicine, highlighted as one of seven emerging research areas under the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. The advancement of this field hinges upon collaborative efforts across diverse disciplines, including clinicians, biomedical engineers, materials scientists, applied physicists, and toxicologists.
Recognizing the imperative for a high-caliber interdisciplinary review platform, WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology emerges to fulfill this critical need. Our topical coverage spans a wide spectrum, encompassing areas such as toxicology and regulatory issues, implantable materials and surgical technologies, diagnostic tools, nanotechnology approaches to biology, therapeutic approaches and drug discovery, and biology-inspired nanomaterials. Join us in exploring the frontiers of nanotechnology and its profound impact on biomedical research and healthcare.